The appointment of federal regulatory commissioners: A case study of the CRTC

Abstract. Members of federal administrative tribunals are selected and appointed in ways which are little known by most people within or close to government and which are even more obscure to the general public. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), one of the most influential of these government agencies, is taken in this essay as a model through which to examine this selection and appointment process. An attempt is made to shed light on the criteria applied to candidates in the process of staffing this commission, as well as on the path such candidacies must follow. With appropriate adaptations to other regulated sectors of the economy, the procedures outlined here may be said to be mirrored in the process of choosing commissioners for other important federal administrative tribunals. From the time when a name is entered on the list of candidates kept by the appropriate minister until the day the cabinet approves the appointment of the minister's nominee, several departments of the government and various bodies involved in the political process have their say in the outcome of the candidacy. This essay shows that the procedure is to a great extent discretionary, but that the exercise of such discretion is sufficiently enshrined in custom to prevent arbitrary abuse. Sommaire. Les membres des tribunaux administratifs fédéraux sont choisis et nommés selon un processus peu connu de l'ensemble du secteur public et parapublic et pratiquement ignoré du grand public. Dans cet article, le Conseil de la Radiodiffusion et des Télécommunications canadiennes (CRTC), l'un des plus importants organismes gouvernementaux, a été choisi afin de permettre l'examen de ce processus de sélection et de nomination. L'auteur tente de mettre en lumière les critères auxquels doivent satisfaire les candidats à un poste dans ce conseil ainsi que l'acheminement bureaucratique que doivent ouivre ces candidatures. Moyennant des adaptations nécessaires aux autres secteurs réglementés de l'économie, les procédés exposés dans cet article reflétent la manière dont sont choisis les commissaires des autres importants tribunaux administratifs fédéraux. Du jour où un nom est inscrit sur la liste des candidats que maintient un certain ministre jusqu'au jour où le Conseil des ministres approuve la nomination de la personne qui a été recommandée par le ministre en question, plusieurs ministères ainsi qu'un nombre de corps politiques ont fait connaître leur Commission. opinion au sujet de la candidature. Cet article démontre que le procédé décrit est en grande partie discrétionnaire mais que l'exercice dune telle discrétion est suffisamment ancré dans l'usage pour que soit évité tout abus arbitraire.     

Subsidies for New Technologies and Knowledge Spillovers from Learning by Doing

This study empirically examines a prominent justification for public subsidies of emerging technologies: that stimulating demand for them provides opportunities for learning by doing. Even if firms learn from their experience, subsidies are still second best to pricing negative externalities if firms can appropriate the benefits of learning. I construct a panel of electricity output from wind power projects, for a case involving $1 billion in public funds, to assess whether firms’ performance benefited from the experience of other firms. I find evidence of learning by doing and knowledge spillovers. However, knowledge gained from experience shows both diminishing returns and depreciating effectiveness.     

Evaluating academic technology transfer performance by how well access to knowledge is facilitated––defining an access metric

Why should research institutions engage in technology transfer? Some say it is about the money. Others say it is about public service and benefit. In the end, we measure what we value. If we only measure money, we confound the non-profit mission of the research institution. If we measure economic impact, the non-profit technology transfer office is often expected to become the economic developer, confusing real estate and business development with technology transfer, often without additional funding. These mission strains lead to overwhelm, fatigue, service shortcomings, and unhappy customers across all classes of stakeholders. This article suggests a return to center for academic technology transfer offices (TTOs) by focusing on a most important question for drivers of our present global knowledge economy––how well does a TTO facilitate access to knowledge protected by intellectual property of its faculty and institution? This article proposes that academic technology transfer performance should be evaluated by how well a TTO avails access to knowledge. Given that performance measures are also referred to as “metrics,” we call this preferred outcomes orientation an access metric.     

Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective

Recent research has questioned both the rigor and theoretical development of public administration research. The proposed solutions have generally endorsed a more academically oriented research agenda. Authors have discussed practitioner needs, but the focus has been on the appropriateness of different research methods rather than the types of knowledge needed. We seek to contribute to this ongoing debate by comparing the knowledge needs identified by members of the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) with 15 years of research in Public Administration Review . We found much published research matching the needs of ICMA members, but it focused on a relatively narrow range of topics. We recommend incorporating a concern for relevance into efforts to improve public administration research. This will help to ensure that we build a knowledge base that makes a substantial contribution to practice.