排序方式: 共有32条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
Family Drug Treatment Courts are a specialized calendar or docket that operates within the juvenile dependency court. These courts provide the setting for a collaborative effort by the court and all the participants in the child protection system to come together in a non‐adversarial setting to determine the individual treatment needs of substance‐abusing parents whose children are under the jurisdiction of the dependency court. This article is intended to give judges and others a judicial perspective on FDTCs, and to offer some assistance for those who are operating or who are considering creating one. 相似文献
4.
5.
LEONARD J. HIPPCHEN 《国际比较与应用刑事审判杂志》2013,37(1):107-117
It is contended here that criminologists should be making conscious and more direct efforts to contribute toward solutions to the increasing problems of global disorder. This paper discusses the problem of social injustice in relation to social disorder, outlines the beginnings of a theoretical model for social justice, and suggests empirical studies and needed methodology to further development of the field of world criminology. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
LEONARD W. LEVY 《Political science quarterly》1999,114(1):79-101
9.
JUDGE LEONARD P. EDWARDS 《Juvenile & family court journal》2004,55(1):1-24
Court proceedings and court records are traditionally open to the public. The courts are public institutions, and openness serves a number of important purposes including protection of the free discussion of governmental affairs and the enhancement of the quality and integrity of the fact finding process. But court proceedings also address family matters including adoptions, juvenile delinquency, child protection, and domestic relations cases. These types of cases often involve personal issues, and many family members would prefer that they remain private. In most states, many of these proceedings have been closed to the public. Strong policy reasons support both openness of family court proceedings and privacy considerations for family members, particularly children. This article addresses confidentiality in the context of juvenile and family court proceedings. It takes the position that the tension between these conflicting policies can be reduced if most family court proceedings are presumptively open, but judges are given the authority to place conditions on the information that can be revealed by observers outside the courtroom. Additionally, the article asserts that if the courts and the media take steps to change their practices and their relationship with one another, both the public interest and the confidentiality interest of the parties can be better served. 相似文献
10.