Sa-Skya Pandita’s Buddhist Argument For Linguistic Study

Journal of Indian Philosophy -     

“三个代表”重要思想是指导我国政党制度进一步完善的总纲

政党制度是我国的一项基本政治制度。不断完善这一制度 ,既意义深远 ,又非常实际、紧迫。“三个代表”重要思想的提出 ,是党几十年实践经验的总结 ,是第三代领导集体一系列理论成果的集中体现 ,更是指导我们进一步完善我国政党制度的总纲。一、不可更易的执政准绳完善的本意是周到、妥当 ,也就是适合。完善政党制度 ,首先需要解决的是政党制度的确立基础和发展依据。各国政党制度尽管千差万别 ,各有特点 ,但其能不能生存和发展 ,都要由能不能与国情适合 ,以及适合的程度如何来决定。所以 ,与国情的适合是政党制度存在的前提和基础 ,也是政党…     

当前宏观经济形势与政策分析

在党的十六大精神和“三个代表”重要思想的指引下,今年上半年我国经济发展虽然受到非典影响,但总体发展仍然呈上升势头。从发展势头可以判断我国经济已逐步摆脱低迷,开始了新一轮的增长。一、十三届四中全会以来我国宏观经济发展的回顾1989年后,为了治理连续五年的通货膨胀,中央在宏观调控上推出双紧方针,即紧缩的财政政策和紧缩的货币政策。通过三年的治理整顿,使通货膨胀得     

解析分立程序中公司高管的责任

盖公司分立,系将被分立公司主要或者全部的营业或资产,移转给承受公司继受,以此作为换取承受公司发行新股之对价,惟当承受公司之股份尚不具备在股票市场流通之客观价值下,对被分立公司股东的权益也将因公司资产的移出而稀释;尤有甚者,公司分立制度的运用,大都是规模庞大的企业,其经公司分立后,自实务运作结果观之,当换股比例不适当时,股东所受的损害更属重大。按是否采用公司分立,公司高管仍握有绝对的主动提案权,相对于公司利害关系人股东,仅居于被动的对公司分立之议案,行使是否同意的权利而已,且即使公司分立必须经由意思决定机关之决议…     

DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures

The DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG) was convened at the 21st congress of the International Society for Forensic Genetics held between 13 and 17 September in the Azores, Portugal. The purpose of the group was to agree on guidelines to encourage best practice that can be universally applied to assist with mixture interpretation. In addition the commission was tasked to provide guidance on low copy number (LCN) reporting. Our discussions have highlighted a significant need for continuing education and research into this area. We have attempted to present a consensus from experts but to be practical we do not claim to have conveyed a clear vision in every respect in this difficult subject. For this reason, we propose to allow a period of time for feedback and reflection by the scientific community. Then the DNA commission will meet again to consider further recommendations.     

The sentencing reform act of 1984: A bold approach to the unwarranted sentencing disparity problem

Conclusion In 1984, after years of study and thorough debate, a bipartisan majority of the Congress enacted perhaps the most far-reaching reform of the federal criminal justice system in the history of the United States. The Sentencing Reform Act and the federal sentencing guidelines are now beginning to produce data indicating that the objectives of avoiding unwarranted disparity and invidious discrimination are being achieved.After an uncertain beginning, the guidelines are gaining acceptance by courts and criminal justice practitioners. As one appellate court observed in admonishing lower courts that the guidelines must be respected:We have embarked on a new course. Only time will tell whether the use of the guidelines will result in an improvement over the old system. But unless we follow the spirit and written directions of the guidelines, we will never know if they have been given a fair test. They at least deserve that.Indeed, the bold new approach to sentencing that is being followed today in federal courthouses throughout the United States deserves an opportunity to succeed, given its many beneficial features and the lofty goals toward which the reforms are directed. While ample work remains for the United States Sentencing Commission to monitor and improve the guidelines, indications at this still early date are that the experiment is succeeding.An earlier version of this paper was presented at the fifth conference of the Society for the Reform of Criminal Law, Parliament House, Edinburgh, Scotland, August 5–9, 1990. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the United States Sentencing Commission.B.A., Davidson College 1964; J.D., University of South Carolina School of Law 1967.B.A., Ohio State University 1974; M.S., Arizona State University 1980; M.A., University of California, Santa Barbara, 1983.B.S., Clemson University 1971; M.S., Clemson University 1975; J.D., University of South Carolina School of Law 1978.