大学生荣辱观存在的问题及成因和对策

当前,大学生荣辱观主要存在六个方面的问题:一是价值取向扭曲,道德水准降低;二是自我主义膨胀,协作愿望匮乏;三是勤俭意识丧失,享乐欲望高涨;四是诚信理念缺位,公德观念薄弱;五是民族精神淡化,理想信念模糊;六是网络伦理失范,思想防线崩溃.导致大学生荣辱观出现问题的主要原因是:市场经济体制带来的"风险"、不良社会风气对大学生的消极影响、高校思想政治教育机制不健全、家庭教育的错位与缺位.高校应采取抓"主渠道"教育、抓"传统文化"教育、抓"理想信念"教育、抓"网络道德"教育、抓"实践环节"教育等对策来解决大学生荣辱观方面存在的问题.     

对国际形势和中国外交的一些看法与思考

一、国际金融危机影响深远 国际金融危机爆发已过去两年多了，但其影响还在发酵，余波还在扩大。这不仅是一场经济危机和金融危机，更是一场深刻的政治危机、思想危机、体制危机和秩序危机，是资本主义社会政治、经济矛盾长期积累必然导致的结果。     

Continuity,change, and priorities: The quality and use of regulatory analysis across US administrations

This paper compares the quality and use of regulatory analysis accompanying economically significant regulations proposed by US executive branch agencies in 2008, 2009, and 2010. We find that the quality of regulatory analysis is generally low, but varies widely. Budget regulations, which define how the federal government will spend money or collect revenues, have much lower‐quality analysis than other regulations. The Bush administration's “midnight” regulations finalized between Election Day and Inauguration Day, along with other regulations left for the Obama administration to finalize, tended to have lower‐quality analysis. Most differences between the Bush and Obama administrations depend on agencies' policy preferences. More conservative agencies tended to produce better analysis in the Obama administration, and more liberal agencies tended to do so in the Bush administration. This suggests that agencies more central to an administration's policy priorities do not have to produce as good an analysis to get their regulations promulgated.     

Limits of knowing or the consequences of difficult-access problems for multi-method research and public policy

How can scientists acquire an adequate level of knowledge on phenomena whose actors actively conceal their activities? Social phenomena such as terrorism, sects, corruption, Mafia organizations, drug dealers, or government intelligence agencies actively guard their secrecy, conceal their activities, decide who is allowed (not) to know, and have no interest in being observed or understood by others. The article discusses the consequences of researching difficult-access problems for doing multi-method research. In an ideal?Ctypical approach, we distinguish between social problems that can be easily accessed and those that are difficult to access or non-accessible. To distinguish the two, we define characteristics that eventually lead to the conclusion that scientific inquiry that follows the conventional paradigm of professionalism, transparency, and replicable research reaches its limits when confronted with the active resistance of phenomena that do not like to be observed, understood, or critically approached. From this flows, the necessity to think about interdisciplinary, collaborative, and investigative modes of research that come with various prices.     

论行政资助的概念、主体和目的

作为给付行政的一种,行政资助作为国家介入市场的一种干预方式,不与平等相矛盾,系以助成为目的,由包括行政机关、社会组织在内的各种资助主体给予私法主体以各种消极或积极的利益,从而合理地、间接地达到提升公共利益的效果。资助主体的社会性将愈来愈显著。