Drug Prevention and the DARE Programme in Britain

An increasing interest in drug prevention has led to the growth in various programmes, most of which have been imported from the United States. The programmes receiving the most acclaim are the so-called resistance training programmes, of which Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) is the most widely used whether in America or elsewhere. It has also been surrounded by controversy. Resistance training programmes are given to schoolchildren, the aim of which is to teach them skills to resist pressure to take drugs. DARE has recently been introduced in Britain in Nottinghamshire; another similar programme, Chemical Abuse Resolution Lies in Education (Project Charlie), operates in Hackney, London. The aim of this paper is to review the data on the effectiveness of these programmes. The conclusion is that drug resistance programmes have had a mixed response in the US, but that Project Charlie has had reasonable success in London and that DARE in Nottinghamshire needs a long-term evaluation to determine its effectiveness. Such an evaluation could have an impact on drugs prevention policy over the next decade.     

Intelligence culture and intelligence failure in Britain and the United States

This article argues for the value of a theory of ‘intelligence culture’ in understanding not only how national intelligence systems work but also how intelligence failures occur in those systems. A model of national intelligence cultures in the governments of the United Kingdom and United States of America is developed combining existing work on organisational culture in the two countries with the author's comparative analysis of different conceptions of intelligence culture in the two systems. This model is used to develop a failure mode analysis of the two systems, which is then tentatively assessed against representative examples from the two countries, culminating in application of the model to the failure of both intelligence systems to correctly estimate Iraqi weapons of mass destruction capabilities prior to March 2003.     

Gender Neutrality,Rape and Trial Talk

This article examines the notion of gender neutrality in rape, its meaning and why rape definitions that include females and males as potential victims of rape have become influential in those jurisdictions that have engaged in significant levels of rape law reform over the last four decades. In so doing, several of Annabelle Mooney’s criticisms of gender neutral rape laws, published in an earlier article, will be critically examined. The second part of this article draws on themes that have been identified in the linguistic analysis of rape trials involving female complainants and applies those themes to two cases of rape and sexual assault involving male complainants. Finally, this article examines whether the tactics used by defence lawyers during cross-examination can be said to be uniquely ‘gendered’ or whether similar tactics exist in cases of male rape and sexual assault. Explanations for possible similarities in treatment are also examined.     

Gender and Negotiation in the Small: Are Women (Perceived to Be) More Cooperative than Men?

We surveyed research by experimental economists that examines gender differences in negotiation in the context of two simple, two-player games. Our purpose is to uncover empirical regularities in the results that might be useful to teachers or practitioners of negotiation. In the dictator game, one player unilaterally determines the division of a fixed amount of money. In the ultimatum game, one player offers a division and the other must accept or reject that offer; if rejected, both players receive a zero payoff. The results have shown that, on balance, women tend to be more egalitarian than men, to expect and ask for less in the negotiation. Women also seem to be more responsive to the context of a negotiation and are less likely to fail to reach an agreement than men. These differences are small, however, in comparison with differences in expectations about what women and men will do. We conclude that stereotyping is alive and well in negotiations and that this can help or hinder negotiation outcomes, depending on the context.     

基于似然率方法的语音证据评价

法庭话者识别技术引入我国已有二十多年,目前该技术已经广泛应用于各类刑事和民事案件中。纵观世界各国的法庭证据评价体系,除了DNA证据以外,其他证据检验鉴定结论的表述通常有三种:同一认定、否定排除和倾向性意见。简单肯定和否定的结论存在很大的弊端,即过高估计了证据的力度,因而有时可能会造成错案。鉴于此,国外一些学者提出在鉴定结论的表述和价值评判上引入基于贝叶斯理论的"似然率"方法。本文结合目前的法庭话者鉴别方法,重点介绍基于贝叶斯理论下的"似然率"理论体系,并阐明该方法的优越性、局限性以及一些亟待解决的问题。     

How to compare regulatory regimes

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

It is the policy of this Journal to only publish material thathas not been published previously. However, an exception hasbeen made with this article as the work from which it has beendrawn has only recently published. This article is taken fromPhilip Wood's Regulation of International Finance, one of aseries of nine works by Philip Wood on the law of practice ofInternational Finance, published by Sweet & Maxwell in 2007.Philip Wood is a member of the Editorial Board of Capital MarketsLaw Journal. Many readers of Capital Markets Law Journal aroundthe world will not have had the chance to read this very topicalarticle which is of exceptional quality and Capital MarketsLaw Journal is very pleased to make it available to the widercapital markets community.                 TheEditors

Key points

• This article examines the criteria which might usefullybe . . . [Full Text of this Article]