全文获取类型
收费全文 | 122篇 |
免费 | 5篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 18篇 |
工人农民 | 3篇 |
世界政治 | 10篇 |
外交国际关系 | 6篇 |
法律 | 55篇 |
中国政治 | 1篇 |
政治理论 | 34篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 1篇 |
2022年 | 5篇 |
2021年 | 2篇 |
2020年 | 8篇 |
2019年 | 11篇 |
2018年 | 5篇 |
2017年 | 12篇 |
2016年 | 14篇 |
2015年 | 4篇 |
2014年 | 6篇 |
2013年 | 8篇 |
2012年 | 2篇 |
2011年 | 5篇 |
2010年 | 6篇 |
2009年 | 9篇 |
2008年 | 7篇 |
2007年 | 6篇 |
2006年 | 4篇 |
2005年 | 1篇 |
2004年 | 1篇 |
2003年 | 3篇 |
2002年 | 2篇 |
2000年 | 4篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有127条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
31.
Philipp Pattberg 《Third world quarterly》2013,34(4):579-593
Abstract Private governance beyond the state is emerging as a prominent debate in International Relations, focusing on the activities of private non-state actors and the influences of private rules and standards. However, the conceptual framework of governance has until recently been employed predominantly with reference to the oecd world. Despite this restricted view, a growing number of processes, organisations and institutions are beginning to affect developing countries and new institutional settings open up avenues of influence for actors from the South. In the context of a lively debate about global governance and the transformation of world politics, this article asks: what influences does private governance have on developing countries, their societies and their economies? What influence do southern actors have in and through private governance arrangements? I argue that we can assess the specific impacts of private governance, as well as potential avenues of influence for actors from the South, with regard to three functional pathways: governance through regulation, governance through learning and discourse, and governance through integration. Focusing in particular on private governance in the global forest arena, I argue that, while southern actors have not benefited so much economically from private certification schemes, they have been partially empowered through cognitive and integrative processes of governance. 相似文献
32.
Philipp Gro?kopf 《Natur und Recht》2009,79(6):764-765
Das deutsche “Gesetz über das Inverkehrbringen, die Rücknahme und die umweltvertr?gliche
Entsorgung von Elektro- und Elektronikger?ten” (ElektroG) ist eines der auf europ?ischen
Vorgaben beruhenden Rechtsinstrumente zur Vermeidung und Entsorgung von Abf?llen. In letzter Zeit
sind hierzu eine Reihe von h?hergerichtlichen Urteilen ergangen, so dass bisher bestehende Unsicherheiten
über die Reichweite der Registrierungspflicht beseitigt, sowie mehr Klarheit bei der Gruppenfinanzierungsverantwortlichkeit
geschaffen wurde. 相似文献
33.
34.
Kenneth W. Abbott Philipp Genschel Duncan Snidal Bernhard Zangl 《Regulation & Governance》2021,15(Z1):S83-S101
Regulators and other governors rely on intermediaries to set and implement policies and to regulate targets. Existing literatures focus heavily on intermediaries of a single type – Opportunists, motivated solely by self-interest. But intermediaries can also be motivated by different types of loyalty: to leaders (Vassals), to policies (Zealots), or to institutions (Mandarins). While all three types of loyalists are resistant to the traditional problems of opportunism (slacking and capture), each brings pathologies of its own. We explain the behavioral logic of each type of loyalty and analyze the risks and rewards of different intermediary loyalties – both for governors and for the public interest. We illustrate our claims with examples drawn from many different realms of regulation and governance. 相似文献
35.
36.
Netherlands International Law Review - 相似文献
37.
38.
39.
Public Choice - Despite extensive econometric testing, the research literature has been unable to draw firm conclusions regarding the effect of economic globalization on government spending. This... 相似文献
40.
Eleni Dellas Philipp Pattberg Michele Betsill 《International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics》2011,11(1):85-98
In the face of global environmental change, a key question for the social sciences is how to organize the co-evolution of
societies and their natural environment. In this context, a new long-term research program, the Earth System Governance Project,
proposes several key issues to be examined: architecture, agency, adaptiveness, accountability, and allocation and access.
The contributions to this special issue have focused on the analytical problem of agency. For example, they have examined
newly emerging or understudied agents of global environmental governance, or offered a fresh assessment of agency in the context
of existing governance mechanisms such as the Clean Development Mechanism. This concluding article outlines several insights
provided by the contributions to this special issue regarding four key questions underlying the study of agency in global
environmental governance. First, they call attention to the ingredients or processes that characterize agency in the first
place and thus distinguish actors from agents. Secondly, the authors highlight the differences among agents and how they interact
with each other. Thirdly, they point toward variation in the ways that agents may acquire authority. Finally, the contributions
to this special issue suggest that there may be several approaches to evaluating agency, with different consequences. Thus,
taken together, the contributions to this special issue provide a starting point for broadening our understanding of agency
in earth system governance. 相似文献