云南回族聚居区社会治安综合治理典型社区调查——个旧市沙甸区社会治安综合治理的成效与启示

对云南回族聚居区的社会治安综合治理,离不开对该民族的地理分布、历史文化、现实发展等因素作综合考察,本文选取近年来云南回族聚居区社会治安综合治理成效显著的个旧市沙甸区作为调查地点,通过对这一典型民族社区社会治安治理发展状况的分析,以期对民族地区基层派出所的公安工作有所启示.     

试论构建有效的公共政策执行机制

再好的公共政策也需要有效的执行才能实现公共政策的目标。通过构建科学的利益平衡机制、民主参与机制、沟通协调机制、监督控制机制、权力配置机制、政治社会化机制将有助于公共政策的有效执行 ,从而实现公共利益     

家庭与青少年犯罪

青少年违法犯罪,是当今各国面临的严重社会问题。这一问题产生的原因是多方面的,其中家庭的负面影响是导致青少年违法犯罪的直接和重要原因。影响青少年健康成长的家庭负面影响,主要包括不良的家庭环境和不当的家庭教育两大方面。要预防和减少青少年犯罪,必须首先从家庭做起。要强化家庭的教育职能,提高家长的素质,营造良好的家庭环境,更新教育观念,讲究教育方法,做到德智并举。     

对故意传播艾滋病的刑事立法刍议

保障艾滋病病毒感染者和艾滋病病人的合法权利,使其得到应有的治疗,并规定他们应承担的避免将艾滋病毒传染给他人,包括亲人的义务。政府必须加快制定HIV感染者病人的行政和刑事管理法规,对“传播艾滋病罪”作出规定。     

试析文化全球化的现状与前景

当前,文化全球化在生活方式、风俗习惯、制度文化、科技教育、共同观念等方面都有了充分的表现,其深度和广度不断扩展,但也存在全球各文化力量严重失衡、全球交融限于外围、组织化程度不高等局限。同时,国际上存在的文化霸权主义、民族文化中心主义、宗教极端主义等,对文化全球化的进一步发展形成了制约。展望文化全球化的未来发展,以美国价值观实现全球文化的一元化不符合人类发展的共同利益,全球各文化的多元互补应是合理的选择。     

Notes on South Asia in Crisis

Abstract

Louis Dumont has argued persuasively that the concept of caste is not simply a form of social stratification, but a way of looking at society as a whole. Dumont argues that the “Western mind” sees society as the relationship between individuals and the mass, but that the “Indian mind” sees relationships between groups (castes) and social unity. This holistic concept of Indian society is essentially religious, for it is based on beliefs and values which reflect a sacred order, undergird religious institutions, and are the subjects of religious texts. At the heart of these beliefs and values are the Hindu concepts of purity/pollution, and the karmic cycle of birth and rebirth. Both of these concepts are intimately related to the notion of Untouchability; and without them, the caste system would lose its religious legitimacy. The question, then, is whether the Untouchables accept this logic, or whether it is forced upon them.     

The Ties that Bind and Blind: Embeddedness and Radicalisation of Youth in One Islamist Organisation in Pakistan

This article explains the factors that contributed to the socialisation of youth into a radical ideology in one nationally powerful Islamist organisation in Pakistan. It argues that young individuals who join Islamist organisations do not necessarily hold pre-existing extremist views that dispose them towards such organisations. Instead, the radicalisation of personal beliefs and worldview may in fact also occur after joining such an organisation. Findings indicate that young members’ gradual orientation to an Islamist ideology resulted from the interplay of a number of factors. First, their close and significant friendships increasingly became concentrated inside the organisation. Second, participation in various organisational meetings brought a personally meaningful improvement in their skills and self-esteem. Third, the organisation bestowed power and influence on its members, both in psychological and actual terms.     

Beyond the Real and the Paper Deal: The Quest for Contextual Coherence in Contractual Interpretation

Contract lawyers are often divided between two schools of thought: formalism and contextualism. In the realm of contractual interpretation, this division illuminates various debates surrounding the modern contextual approach. Ultimately, however, the divide between the ‘real and the paper deal’ does not fully reflect the relevant fault lines. The real contest is between rival interpretations attempting to make the most coherent sense of the available text and context surrounding the document. In characterising the true nature of the exercise, I draw upon theories of coherence to articulate a framework of ‘contextual coherence’ that involves concepts of competing narratives, the rational motivations of the parties, and the need for a holistic assessment of the best hypothesis, in accordance with the English courts’ ‘iterative approach’ to interpretation. I demonstrate that this framework enables us to explain and evaluate recent cases such as the UK Supreme Court decision of Arnold v Britton.     

刑事诉权初探

现代诉权是宪法性权利,刑事诉权也不例外。刑事诉权的概念不能简单借鉴其他诉权的概念,它应等同于自诉权与公诉权之和,是指刑事纠纷的当事人因权益受侵害,依法请求国家专门机关通过诉讼方式依正当程序解决该刑事纠纷和附带民事诉讼纠纷,并最终由裁判机关依法做出裁决的宪法性基本权利。从最终意义上讲,刑事纠纷的最终解决机关应当是法院,但在审前程序中,又不应当仅仅限于法院。刑事诉权具有主体多样性、内部关系复杂性、阶段性、其他诉权的后盾与保障等特征。对于当事人诉权主体而言,刑事诉权是基本人权在刑事诉讼中的具体化。当事人适格及诉的利益是其必备要素。     

我国刑事证据制度之新发展——基于修改后《刑事诉讼法》之分析

结合我国现行刑事诉讼法的第二次修改,文章全面阐述了我国刑事证据概念、种类的发展与完善;刑事证据规则的各种类型及其构建样态;非法证据排除规则的有关规定,即非法言词证据的界定、非法证据排除的诉讼阶段、非法证据排除的范围;非法证据的排除程序,即非法证据排除动议的提起主体、证据收集合法性的证明主体、非法证据的排除主体;同时,指出了刑事证据制度在刑事诉讼法第二次修改中存在的不足。