Explaining Responsiveness in Collaboration: Administrator and Citizen Role Perceptions

Between 2003 and 2006, researchers facilitated a collaborative learning process with representatives of Los Angeles neighborhood councils and officials from city agencies. In two cases, each involving a large city agency, the quality of responsiveness on the part of agency officials to participating citizens was substantially different. This study considers the reasons why agency officials differed in their responsiveness. Using an inductive qualitative and quantitative content analysis across three sources of data, the study develops theory pertaining to bureaucratic responsiveness to citizens in collaborative processes. Specifically, the case findings are generalized to theory through seven propositions for future study. The study's key finding is that administrator and citizen perceptions of their own and the other party's roles may influence the quality of responsive behavior in collaborative activity. The propositions identify subfactors or contingencies that may allow administrators to be more responsive to citizens in collaborative processes.     

United States‐Indian defense cooperation

Abstract

This article examines the changing nature of U.S.‐Indian defense relations during the past decade. Specifically, it covers the motivations, manner, and manifestations of the qualitative and quantitative expansion of military cooperation. Particular attention is paid to the policy and perceptual changes that facilitated defense cooperation and the mechanisms developed to implement the mutually agreed upon goal. Finally, the potential remaining obstacles to close U.S.‐Indian defense ties are noted.     

The great lakes crisis: An American view

An examination of Taiwan's development from an agrarian economy only 50 years ago to a leading high‐tech economy.     

Socially responsible Criminology: Quality relevant research with targeted,effective dissemination

This address argues that some members of the criminology community must take upon themselves the responsibility of communicating the knowledge developed by the field to practitioners and decision makers. It is reasoned that only with such targeted dissemination will the full potential benefits from our work be realized.