Immigration and Crime in the New Destinations, 2000–2007: A Test of the Disorganizing Effect of Migration

Objectives

Drawing from a social disorganization perspective, this research addresses the effect of immigration on crime within new destinations—places that have experienced significant recent growth in immigration over the last two decades.

Methods

Fixed effects regression analyses are run on a sample of n = 1252 places, including 194 new destinations, for the change in crime from 2000 to the 2005–2007 period. Data are drawn from the 2000 Decennial Census, 2005–2007 American Community Survey, and the Uniform Crime Reports. Places included in the sample had a minimum population of 20,000 as of the 2005-07 ACS. New destinations are defined as places where the foreign-born have increased by 150 % or more since 1990 and with a minimum foreign-born population of 1000 in 2007.

Results

Results indicate new destinations experienced greater declines in crime, relative to the rest of the sample. Moreover, new destinations with greater increases in foreign-born experienced greater declines in their rates of crime. Additional predictors of change in crime include change in socioeconomic disadvantage, the adult-child ratio, and population size.

Conclusions

Results fail to support a disorganization view of the effect of immigration on crime in new destinations and are more in line with the emerging community resource perspective. Limitations and suggestions for future directions are discussed.

     

At the frontiers of scientific advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators

This paper aims to unearth the factors that influence scientists in becoming and choosing to become publicly funded principal investigators (PIs). PIs are the linchpins of knowledge transformation and bridging triple helix actors, particularly academia-industry. At a micro level, PIs are at the nexus of engaging and interacting with other triple helix actors. No study to date has specifically focused on the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded PIs. For scientists taking on the role of a PI represents an important landmark in their research career. Set in an Irish research system we found two main categories of influencing factors—push and pull. Pull factors are where the PI has more choice in choosing to become a PI, where as push factors is where the PI has less choice in choosing to become a PI. Pull factors we identified were control, career ambition and advancement, personal drive and ambition. Pull factors we identified were project dependencies and institutional pressures.     

The Structure of Political Competition: Dimensions of Candidate and Group Evaluation Revisited

In this paper, we take a fresh look at the structure of sociopolitical conflict through confirmatory factor analyses of survey data gathered in Florida during the presidential campaign of 1996. Our analysis shows both stability and change in the electorate. In line with prior research, a single bipolar partisan dimension underlies the mass public's evaluations of political leaders, though national figures fit more comfortably on this continuum than do those at the state level. Citizens' evaluations of key sociopolitical groups reflect orthogonal cultural disputes, class divisions, and conflicts relating to issues of social control. While all three of these dimensions impinge to some degree on voters' conceptions of party and ideology, our findings point to the leading role that cultural issues now play in shaping ideological images and identities.     

L'information administrative au Québec: faits et interprétations

Sommaire. L'information administrative. dans nos sociétés. sodre de failles diverses. Une recherche, faite pour le compte du Ministère des Communications du Québec, a voulu éclairer ces failles en vue de les corriger. La principale composante de la recherche a consisté en 78 entrevues de groupe conduites auprès de hauts-fonctionnaires, de fonctionnaires de contact, et de clients privilégés de différentes entités administratives. De plus, 17 experts de différentes disciplines se réunirent pendant deux jours avec des fonctionnaires du Ministère des Communications et d'autres ministères pour tenter d'interpréter et de situer dans des contextes plus larges les problèmes de l'information administrative. Après avoir défini l'information administrative d'après un schéma de la communication empruntéà Roman Jakobson, l'article fait état des principales constatations qui ont été faites lors de la recherche. Ensuite sont présentées les diverses interprétations proposées par les experts: interprétations psychologiques, interprétations en termes de techniques de la communication, interprétations micro-économiques, et interprétations en termes de pouvoir. Les forces et les faiblesses de ces interprétations sont évaluées, après quoi est esquissée une analyse structurale, où l'insistance est mise sur la capacité qu'ont les acteurs d'imposer les contacts par où passe l'information administrative. Il est montré en conclusion comment cette analyse structurale permet d'intégrer les interprétations proposées par les experts, et comment elle pourrait être améliorée dans des recherches subséquentes. Abstract. Administrative information, in our societies, suffers from various shortcomings. A research project undertaken on behalf of the Quebec Department of Communications has tried to focus on these weaknesses in order to eliminate them. The main element of the research was 78 group interviews with senior officials, ‘contact’ civil servants, and privileged clients of various administrative entities. Furthermore, 17 experts in various disciplines met for two days with officials of the Department of Communications and other departments in an attempt to interpret and place in broader contexts the problems of administrative information. Administrative information having been defined according to a communication grid borrowed from Roman Jakobson, this article states the various facts established by the research. Then, the various interpretations offered by the experts are presented: psychological interpretations, interpretations in terms of communication techniques, micro-economic interpretations, and interpretations in terms of power. Strengths and weaknesses of these interpretations are evaluated, and then a structural analysis is attempted; it focuses on the actors' ability to impose the contacts channelling administrative information. In conclusion it is shown how this structural analysis allows an integration of the interpretations proposed by the experts and how it could be improved with further research.     

Where to Begin?

If what goes on in human societies are viewed as "institutionalfacts"rather than "brutefacts," then basic issues are raised withregard to the meaning of federalism. Institutional facts areconstituted by reference to rules and rule-ordered arrangements.Such arrangements turn upon design concepts and their placein the constitution of order in human societies. Constitutingsocieties through patterns of covenantal relationships impliesthat federal societies cannot be understood by placing primaryreliance on forms of government. The question "where to begin?"raises basic ontological and epistemological problems bearingon the place of language and culture in the constitution ofcovenanting societies.     

The brokering role of technology transfer offices within entrepreneurial ecosystems: an investigation of macro–meso–micro factors

The Journal of Technology Transfer - Previous studies have identified the importance of entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystems, however, few have considered in an integrated multi-level way, the...     

Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison

Since the 1960s, there have been calls for forensic voice comparison to be empirically validated under casework conditions. Since around 2000, there have been an increasing number of researchers and practitioners who conduct forensic-voice-comparison research and casework within the likelihood-ratio framework. In recent years, this community of researchers and practitioners has made substantial progress toward validation under casework conditions becoming a standard part of practice: Procedures for conducting validation have been developed, along with graphics and metrics for representing the results, and an increasing number of papers are being published that include empirical validation of forensic-voice-comparison systems under conditions reflecting casework conditions. An outstanding question, however, is: In the context of a case, given the results of an empirical validation of a forensic-voice-comparison system, how can one decide whether the system is good enough for its output to be used in court? This paper provides a statement of consensus developed in response to this question. Contributors included individuals who had knowledge and experience of validating forensic-voice-comparison systems in research and/or casework contexts, and individuals who had actually presented validation results to courts. They also included individuals who could bring a legal perspective on these matters, and individuals with knowledge and experience of validation in forensic science more broadly. We provide recommendations on what practitioners should do when conducting evaluations and validations, and what they should present to the court. Although our focus is explicitly on forensic voice comparison, we hope that this contribution will be of interest to an audience concerned with validation in forensic science more broadly. Although not written specifically for a legal audience, we hope that this contribution will still be of interest to lawyers.     

Balancing regulatory controls and incentives: toward smarter and more transparent oversight in long-term care

Government oversight of long-term care involves inspections of patients' records, limited observations of patients and care practices, reviews of policies and procedures, and distribution of publicly available information. Although many providers bemoan the stifling consequences of excessive regulation, oversight in this area remains a highly legitimate endeavor for the public, though the public has limited trust in the existing regulatory regime. This distrust stems from many sources, not least of which includes considerable variation, both within and across states, in the way government oversight occurs. Reforming the current regulatory structure requires that we regulate "smarter" and more consistently. This means improving and maximizing use of the data already being collected, but it also means explicitly rationalizing the regulator's responsibility to review performance and apply sanctions when necessary. Oversight should more closely resemble consultancy, with regulators sharing information with providers about how to improve quality. Ideally, there needs to be an iterative process in which state inspectors identify performance problems and the nation's quality improvement organizations then help providers design quality improvement interventions to ameliorate the problems identified. The benefits of a revised regulatory approach are especially apparent in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, where more effective oversight would have identified nursing home residents at risk for low-quality care before the disaster occurred while better identifying those in need of evacuation or assistance afterward.