CHINA’S DIPLOMACY IN TRANSITION

正The new Chinese leadership aims to create a favorable international environment for the country's developmentChina’s diplomacy in 2013 was eye-catch ing due to the leadership change in the country and the reinvigoration of reform The spirit of reform and a world vision,which China’s new leadership inherits from their pre decessors,are the soul of Chinese diplomacy today.Today’s world The current situation is quite different from when China’s reform and opening up started in the late 1970s.China’s national strength has grown exponentially since then.As a result,the     

REJECTING THE ‘G2’

China’s rise should not be accompanied by hegemonyIs China a world power second only to the United States?On September 12,when delivering a speech at the Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen,former Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing gave an humorous answer     

Obstructive all the way? British policy towards German unification 1989–90

British policy towards German unification has been judged to be at best reluctant, at worst obstructive. This article seeks to revise that perception, using documents from the Federal Chancellor's Office and the author's interviews with British and German diplomats and politicians. It distinguishes between the rhetoric of the British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The latter played a leading role in the Two Plus Four talks that resolved the external issues involved in German unification, and made a particular contribution to devising the formula for the termination of Four Power Rights over a unified Germany.     

死刑适用基本标准之统一——中国死刑发展一种可行视角

当今中国死刑严格限制或废除之路由于与民意发生极大抵触似乎已然陷入了瓶颈状态,而中国《刑法》分则和司法实践对死刑适用基本标准之长期悖逆恰为我们避开民意这一雷区,从立法技术和司法适用自身探寻现阶段死刑严格限制之方法,以便在无震荡或最小震荡情况下达到严格限制死刑之目的,提供了一种可行的视角。     

China: A responsible great power

If China can maintain the trend of its economic development, by the middle of the twenty-first century China will be among the great powers in the world. Whether China can become a responsible great power or not will depend on both internal and external factors. During recent years, China has been making big progress in integrating itself into international economic and political mechanisms. This paper argues that the more closely China integrates itself into international economic and political mechanisms, the more willing it will be to play a responsible role in the international community. It also argues that there are some conditions necessary to make China a responsible great power. In particular, China needs to be confident about the international security environment and international mechanisms; other countries should help China to participate in international mechanisms; the strategic balance in the Asia‐Pacific region should be established and maintained; and the Taiwan issue should be dealt with properly.     

论图书馆心理学在图书馆业务工作中的应用

图书馆心理学是一门交叉学科,运用读者学、图书馆学、心理学、社会学、管理学等诸多理论来研究文献交流过程中的心理现象及规律。分析研究读者心理及馆员心理,有助于图书馆科学地总结为读者服务的经验,提高服务质量和效率。在图书馆的参考咨询、采购、分编、流通阅览等业务工作部门,充分利用图书馆心理学,充分利用不同人的不同性格气质来分配安排工作,有助于做到人尽其才。     

浅析课程远程辅导与面授技术

现代远程教育飞速发展,其中课程远程辅导与面授技术的研究和应用在远程教育中已显得越来越重要.通过加强面授导学和网络导学,课程辅导教师应担当起组织者、指导者、开发者等多重角色,学生应加强自主与协作学习,采取师生交互行为策略有效应用等措施促进课程远程辅导与面授技术有效整合,从而提高远程教育的绩效,促进其实现可持续发展.     

战略竞争背景下美国对华贸易威慑分析

从威慑视角对中美贸易交锋进行分析发现,美国对华贸易战的本质是一种力图在逐步升级的方略指导下利用贸易手段对华传递出危险信号,让中国认识到任何与美方意愿相悖的行为都将得不偿失,进而迫使中方将自身行为"规范"在符合美方利益框架内的威慑行为。与此同时,为了确保对华贸易威慑的成本不影响特朗普总统连任,以及避免让对华贸易威慑的实际结果与"让美国再次伟大"的初衷背道而驰,特朗普政府在对华贸易威慑的过程中又始终与中方保持必要的接触,以避免威慑失控。美国将贸易纳入对华威慑"工具箱"的原因在于,相较于其他威慑手段,贸易在当前战略竞争背景下的大国博弈中更能发挥作用。美国对华发动贸易威慑的实力基础,在于其以科技、市场、金融及规则为支撑的贸易霸权。虽然贸易战在客观上给中国带来了一定的负面影响,但从总体上看,美国的贸易威慑并未取得预期效果,这关键在于中方审时度势的反向威慑。从长远来看,贸易战作为美国对华威慑的新手段,必将伴随中美战略竞争的整个过程。     

我国电子警务的问题研究

电子警务是公安信息化建设的高级发展阶段,也是公安信息化的重要领域之一。与以往的发展阶段不同,实现电子警务将是对传统警务方式和结构的全面改造过程。进入21世纪以来,我国的电子警务事业得以快速发展,但是在推进发展的过程中出现了一些亟待解决的问题。通过对电子警务进行分析,结合电子警务现阶段的实际情况,指出有碍于电子警务施行和发展的一些相关问题,并提出切实可行的改进措施。     

中文BBS论坛中涉日议题的网络民族主义呈现

互联网BBS论坛为民族主义问题的开放讨论提供了全新而自由的平台。基于特殊事件的民族主义分析框架,是否适用于网络常态舆论中与民族国家相关问题的探讨,是一个值得检验的命题。本研究发现,网络常态舆论中的涉日议题在不同论坛具有不同类型偏好;涉日议题并非均为负面话题,也不能普遍性地引发具有民族主义倾向的讨论;该类议题所触发语言暴力的程度低于其他常规性议题;不同论坛间用户在部分议题类别上呈现出较为明显的态度差异。