The Korean experience in FDI and Sino-Korean relations

The possibility of regional cooperation in the Yellow Sea Rim (YSR) area has been discussed since the early 1980s. In recent years, Korean outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) has increased rapidly and it will be growing much further. In the new phase of the global economy and the post-cold war political environment, Korean firms consider the socialist countries, especially China, to be attractive new partners for trade and investment projects. Foreign investment contributed to economic growth in developing countries. In the early stage of industrialization in the 1970s, the share of foreign firms amounted to about one-tenth of the total manufacturing employment in Korea. Similarly, outbound Korean FDI could also play an important role in the industrialization of the LDCs in Southeast Asia and China. A case study of a Korean multinational corporation reveals that the direct employment effect of Korea’s FDI is extensive in terms of money invested. In spite of the complementarity in economic structure and the phase of development between Korea and China, the prospect of Korea’s outbound FDI is not all clear. However, one can safely assume that the unit scale of FDI projects will increase. Unlike in the past, the large Korean corporations are now preparing more than a few fair-sized projects in China. The positive impact of those FDI will be significant. The YSR cooperation, if successful, could create efficient economic cooperation based on complementarity between Korea and China. The Korean outbound FDI would pave a road to such regional cooperation. This article is the revised version of a paper prepared for the International Conference on Regional Development in the Yellow Sea Rimlands, held February 18–21, 1991. The conference was cosponsored by the Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, the State Science and Technology Commission of China, and the East-West Center of Honolulu, Hawaii.     

STRATEGIC RE-EVALUATION

正After nearly 20 years in the shadows,Taliban forces once again took control of Kabul,capital of Afghanistan,on August 16.The rapid Taliban takeover and the withdrawal of U.S.troops from the country denoted the end of the Afghan War first launched by the George W.Bush administration in 2001.Furthermore,it indicated the failure of U.S.policy in the Greater Middle East region,leaving the local geopolitical structure facing a new round of profound adjustments.     

公民社会责任价值论析

人是作为社会责任的主体而存在的.公民的社会责任价值即为能够直接满足人的生存和发展或满足实现目的需要的价值,内含着主体性价值、道德价值、教育价值和法律价值等价值形态.公民社会责任诸价值之间是相互联系、相辅相成的关系.为了实现公民的这种社会责任,维护社会的公平和正义,人们应充分认识社会责任价值体现,做到自身价值和社会价值的统一,目的价值与手段价值的统一.     

优化空间结构 助推黔中城市群发展

文章利用2000-2009年统计数据对黔中城市群经济发展水平进行分析,采用首位度等指标对黔中城市群等级规模结构进行探讨。研究发现,黔中经济区初步具备城市群发育的基础。但是,黔中城市群存在总体的城市数量偏少、大城市缺位、中小城市数量不足、黔中城市群的城市规模等级结构不合理等问题。对于大城市不足的黔中地区而言,比较现实的城镇化发展路径,可能是一方面增强特大城市的辐射力;另一方面重点改善城市群内中小城市的基础设施条件和投资环境,改善城市间交通运输条件,帮助它们发展成为较大城市;从而逐步形成一个良性的城市群结构。     

宗教信仰对资本主义经济的影响

马克斯·韦伯在其著作《新教伦理与资本主义精神》中谈到了宗教信仰对社会经济的巨大影响,试图从民族性格、文化取向上论证精神品格对经济层面的作用。他以独特的观察视角揭示了一种新颖的宗教观,展现了作者的人文关怀。乍看起来这与马克思＂经济基础决定上层建筑＂的分析思路截然不同,二者宗教观照亦大相径庭。但细究其质,韦伯的方法论与马克思的思想不无关联,在很多论证中秉承了马克思主义哲学的精髓。     

论大学生学习权司法救济的空间拓展

大学生学习权具有自由权属性与社会权属性。从应然的角度讲,具备独立法律人格的大学生具有选择学习内容、学习方法以及要求司法救济的权利。大学生的学习权利属于大学自治权属范围,就是依据学术共同体的自律作为营造大学法制秩序,保护大学生学习权的拥有、行使与受益。但是,由于大学内部利益预设的多元化并存,单纯的大学自治无法有效保护大学生学习权益。所以,有必要拓展大学生学习权司法救济的空间,让司法的阳光照进大学校园。     

行政诉讼重作判决具体适用之探析

作为保障行政纠纷在行政诉讼程序中得到实质性解决的判决形式之一,重作判决的适用必须以原告提出重作请求为前提,须附加在撤销判决之后,被诉具体行政行为针对的行政管理问题需要重新处理,且被告对需要重新处理的事项具有法定管辖权。法院在重作判决中,应确定重作的期限,对羁束性行政行为的判决,可附加必要的指示。同时,立法应明确重作判决的效力,明确重作判决的适用要求及对重作行为进行监督与救济的保障性措施。     

One Belt One Road,New Diplomacy and Public Diplomacy

正President Xi Jinping put forward the term "Silk Road Economic Belt" on September 7th,2013 in Kazakhstan when he proposed in his speech "to forge closer economic ties,deepen cooperation and expand development space in the Eurasian region,we should take an innovative approach and jointly     

《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》两部解释的差异及剖析

我国新《人体损伤程度鉴定标准》于2014年1月1日正式施行,现有的《人体损伤程度鉴定标准释义》及《人体损伤程度鉴定标准适用指南》两部解释均在指导、适用新标准的实施细节中作了详细规定,但因某些条款的规定存在差异,导致不同法医在办理案件时出现结论相异的现象。