Forensic investigation of OOXML format documents

MS Office documents could be illegally copied by offenders, and forensic investigators still face great difficulty in investigating and tracking the source of these illegal copies. This paper mainly proposes a forensic method based on the unique value of the revision identifier (RI) to determine the source of suspicious electronic documents. This method applies to electronic documents which use Office Open XML (OOXML) format, such as MS Office 2007, Mac Office 2008 and MS Office 2010. According to the uniqueness of the RI extracted from documents, forensic investigators can determine whether the suspicious document and another document are from the same source. Experiments demonstrate that, for a copy of an electronic document, even if all the original characters are deleted or formatted by attackers, forensic examiners can determine that the copy and the original document are from the same source through detecting the RI values. Additionally, the same holds true if attackers just copy some characters from the original document to a newly created document. As long as there is one character left whose original format has not been cleared, forensic examiners can determine that the two documents are from the same source using the same method. This paper also presents methods for OOXML format files to detect the time information and creator information, which can be used to determine who the real copyright holder is when a copyright dispute occurs.     

建设工程领域拖欠农民工工资责任主体分析

近年来拖欠农民工工资问题愈演愈烈,不仅使农民工辛苦的血汗钱化为泡影,生活得不到保障,而且严重扰乱建筑市场的秩序,严重违反了公平原则,社会影响恶劣,亟需解决。但在我国现行的法制体系下,农民工只能向与其有直接劳动关系的单位或组织主张支付工资的请求,而不能向与其有间接联系的发包方、工程总承包方主张支付工资请求权,不利于保护农民工的利益。这一切源自于合同相对性的限制,合同相对性就表现在主体的相对性、内容的相对性以及最重要的是责任的相对性,但是我国不乏有突破这一原则的立法例。将这些突破归结到一点,可以发现突破点就在于满足实现社会实质正义的需要,将法律的天平倾向于保护社会弱势群体,以形式上的不平等实现实质的正义,将拖欠农民工工资的责任落实到实处,将发包方和工程总承包方纳入到责任体系,以切实解决我国这一关乎民生的问题。     

民族认同与国家认同的整合模式研究

随着当今社会的快速发展,各个民族的利益诉求不断增加,民族问题不断涌现,导致认同危机的出现,这些严重损害了民族的团结,国家的安定.构建民族认同与国家认同的整合模式,是任何一个多民族国家发展所必须面对的一个重大可题.     

Can markets be expected to prevent themselves from self‐destruction?

Even if competitive markets have shown themselves to be the most efficient organizational form for creating economic efficiency, the question of how they can avoid destructive influence from agents with opportunistic motives remains unresolved. Different institutional approaches have argued that to be efficient, markets need to be embedded in a set of formal and informal institutions. Because such institutions will in the long run make all market agents better off, they are labeled efficient institutions. Contrary to what is argued in neoclassical economics, it is unlikely that such institutions will be created endogenously by market agents because the institutions are to be understood as genuine public goods. Moreover, if such institutions have been established, we should expect market agents to face a collective action problem when sustaining them, leading to the destruction of the institutions. The conclusion is that if left to themselves, markets should be understood as inherently self‐destructive.     

儒家的“大同观”与现实的“尊严论”

＂大同观＂是中华文化永续性的主线,＂尊严论＂是构建和谐社会的基石。当中华文化精华的承续与社会主义科学发展观的创新有机结合之时,我们将不断接近中华民族的伟大复兴目标。     

司法公正与司法权的国家本位

司法公正是司法活动的本质要求,是法院和其他司法机关所追求的根本目的.司法权的国家本位是一种国家完全主导司法活动的"司法状态".司法权的国家本位对司法公正的影响是深重的.它使"无讼是求"成为主流的司法文化,也使得司法活动不重程序,司法活动和司法制度过分强调国家和社会"秩序".要真正实现司法公正,必须适当调整司法权的国家独占,让社会和公民在司法活动中发挥更重要的作用.     

公共监督是最管用的“防腐墙”——天津市推进“公共服务化”监督的启示

监督是反腐倡廉的强效手段,公共监督是最管用的"防腐墙",是化解人民内部矛盾、缓解党群干群冲突最实用的"防火墙".要发挥监督的最大效力,必须适应建设和谐社会和完善市场经济的新形势,创新监督方式,为所有合法的权力性、权利性监督主体提供各得其所、各就各位、各尽所能的监督服务.天津"监督服务化,服务公共化"的监督模式带来诸多有益启示为公共监督提供公共服务,用公共监督改善公共服务.     

和谐社会建设语境中的"愤青""恶搞"现象评析

本文从激化社会矛盾、影响社会心态、消解主流价值以及干扰言论自由等四个方面具体分析了"愤青"与"恶搞"给和谐社会建设带来的负面影响,提出构建社会主义和谐社会必须重视和照顾青年的利益诉求,在此基础上探讨了加强和改进青年思想政治教育,推动和谐社会建设的对策与途径.     

公共行政组织发展意义的理性视角

作为行政管理的主体,政府组织发展是公共行政发展的核心议题.行政发展是公共行政管理追求的终极目标,也是行政组织理论研究和管理实践的最终指向.政府组织发展必须通过适应与选择活动的持续高效率才能完成,追求二者的"融合统一"便成为理解行政组织发展意义的重要切入点.本文通过发展理论的简要回顾来诠释组织发展蕴育的精神,依据行政生态模式透视组织适应与选择"融合统一"的理路,以建设性矛盾对待方法探寻行政组织和谐有序发展的内在意义.     

信息网络传播权与发行权的冲突与协调

在我国现行民事、刑事和行政立法中均存在将网络传播行为定义为发行行为的规定,从而使得传统发行权与现代信息网络传播权在适用范围上出现了冲突。通过比较法考察得知,冲突形成的原因在于我国立法对网络传播行为规制模式的混乱。协调这一冲突有两种方案一是沿用现有发行权的定义,删除信息网络传播权;二是保留信息网络传播权,对发行权的定义作出修改。