Y-chromosome STR haplotypes in Somalis

A total of 201 males from Somalia were typed for the Y-chromosome STRs DYS19, DYS385a/b, DYS389-I, DYS389-II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438 and DYS439 with the PowerPlex Y kit (Promega). A total of 96 different haplotypes were observed and the haplotype diversity was 0.9715. The number of unique haplotypes was 71 while the most common haplotype was observed 24 times.     

Y-chromosome STR haplotypes in Danes

A total of 185 unrelated Danish males were typed for the Y-chromosome STRs DYS19, DYS385a/b, DYS389-I, DYS389-II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438 and DYS439 using the kits PowerPlex Y (Promega), ReliaGene Y-Plex 6 and ReliaGene Y-Plex 5 (Reliagene Technologies). A total of 163 different haplotypes were observed and among these, 144 haplotypes were unique. The gene diversity was 0.9985. In DYS392, a variant allele migrating as a 10.2 allele was observed. Sequencing of the allele showed a deletion upstream the repeated area.     

Managing the Welfare State: Lessons from Gustav Möller*

The administrative problems of the present Welfare State have come into focus in recent research. The basic question being raised is whether an elected government can control the bureaucracies that handle the social programmes, i.e., whether the intentions of the parliamentary majority really can be translated into action when they reach the point of administrative implementation. The central subject of this study is the legendary architect of the Swedish Welfare State, Gustav Möller, who was Minister of Social Affairs 1924-26 and 1932-51. It is argued that many of the problems highlighted in present theories of public administration were already apparent to Möller. As the minister responsible for the administrative construction of the Swedish Welfare State, he developed several strategies to cope with the problems of bureaucracy. Having lost the battle over the Social Democratic party leadership in 1946, Gustav Möller left the government in 1951. Subsequently many of his original anti-bureaucratic administrative strategies were reversed.     

中西警察学研究的区别与趋同

中国人在引进西方警察科学时不仅改进了我国的警务实践,更深化了警察学的理论研究,创造了警察学。随着我国警察学研究的进一步深化和发展,越来越多的警察学研究者提出创建独立的警察学大学科。但是,中国警察学毕竟不同于西方的警察学。因此,对中西方警察学的研究予以比较,借鉴西方警察学研究的优点,回避其缺陷,探索出我国警察学建设的发展方向就显得极其必要。     

河北省参与"西部计划"大学生志愿者情况调查分析

对2003年河北省服务西部大学生志愿者的调查表明,他们参与"西部计划"的动机主要为"国家需要"、"自我锻炼",98%的志愿者表示对未来1～2年的服务"有信心",多数志愿者表示服务期满后会考虑继续留在西部.同时,调查也发现服务期满后的就业问题是这些志愿者最担忧的问题.     

法治警务框架下行政即时强制的规范和救济

行政即时强制是公安机关和其他有权机关在执法过程中经常运用的一种极为特殊的行政强制手段。由于它的特殊性和高自我裁量性,在理论上和实践中都极为容易造成对公民人权的损害。法治警务框架的构建和“立警为公,执政为民”的提出必然要求对即时强制予以规范和救济。     

对挪用公款罪中"归个人使用"的质疑

我国法学界对挪用公款罪中"归个人使用"的争论由来已久.2002年4月全国人大常委会作出的立法解释虽然较为科学地界定了"公款使用者"的范围,增强了司法实践可操作性,但仍有不足之处,也产生了一些新的问题.无论从司法实践还是立法发展来看,"归个人使用"都不应成为挪用公款的必备要件.按照普遍定罪列举不构罪的特殊技术,尽快对挪用公款罪修订完善,以确保及时有效地打击该类犯罪.     

“张国华先生学术思想暨21世纪中国法学展望研讨会”综述

<正> 张国华先生是我国著名的法学家,曾为中国法律思想史的研究工作和法学教育作出了卓越的贡献。如今,他离开我们已经三载有余,为了更好的继承先生的学术成果、发扬先生的治学风范,由北京大学法律学系《中外法学》编辑部北京大学法律学系法律史教研室、中国法律史学会中国法律思想分会联合召开的“张国华先生学术思想暨21世纪中国法学展望研讨会”于1999年5月28日在北京大学举行。来自全国各地的60余位相关学科领域的著名学者参加了会议。北京大学法学院院长吴志攀教授、原北京大学党委书记王学珍、北京大学党委副书记赵存生、原中国政法大学校长陈光中教授、中国法律史学会会长韩延龙教授等到会并讲话,会上并宣读了全国政协副主席罗豪才,中国人民大学法学院院长曾宪义教授,中山大学刘恒焕教授