The More You Say the Less It Means: Overreporting and Attenuated Criterion Validity in a Forensic Disability Sample

A recent publication in Psychological Bulletin by McGrath et al. (Psychological Bulletin 136:450–470, 2010) challenged the necessity of response bias indicators in applied psychological assessment on the grounds that there is insufficient empirical support that shows that they are able to moderate the prediction of substantive measures. The current study challenges their conclusions by examining the effects of response bias in a sample of 2,275 disability litigants. We utilized the validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath and Tellegen, 2008) in order to establish a group of litigants who did not exhibit evidence of overreporting and compared them to a group of overreporting litigants. The overreporting group scored significantly higher on every Restructured Clinical Scale. Moreover, we compared the criterion validity between various substantive scales on the MMPI-2-RF and extratest measures [e.g., Beck Depression Inventory-II (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996)] and found evidence of significantly attenuated criterion validity in the overreporting group. Implications of the study in light of the review by McGrath and colleagues are discussed.     

LabCorp v. Metabolite Laboratories: The Supreme Court listens, but declines to speak.

In the United States, a longstanding legal rule exists against patenting natural phenomena. The Supreme Court recently had an opportunity to help define the boundaries and clarify the implications of this "natural phenomenon doctrine" in Laboratory Corporation of America v. Metabolite Labs., dismissed as improvidently granted. This article argues that the natural phenomenon doctrine renders both the patent claim at issue in LabCorp, and the patents that directly or indirectly claim biological correlations between genotypes and medical phenotypes, invalid or unenforceable under U.S. patent law.     

Federalism: Distance and Devolution

Is the current federal system in Australia still relevant? Have the historical forces which made federation a necessary step in Australia's journey toward nationhood largely disappeared? Australian federalism has united six disparate states into one nation and established national infrastructure to enhance our position domestically and internationally. The geographic tyranny of distance that divided the colonies has been overcome through improved transport, telecommunications and information technology. This article explores the historical basis of Australian federalism and asks whether federalism remains relevant for meeting the challenges facing Australia in the twenty‐first century.     

Patronage politics, donor reforms, and regime consolidation in Uganda

Using the state and its resources has constituted a vital formof consolidating power for Africa’s rulers. However, donor-sponsoredreforms have threatened to curtail the opportunities of Africanleaders to maintain their regimes in power. Donor reforms introducedunder structural adjustment programmes have sought to reducethe size and scope of government as well as to cut state spendingand thereby curb the possibilities of state patronage. Reformshave also attempted to contain corruption and improve stategovernance. In Uganda, however, the relationship between donorsand the government has reproduced patronage government. Thedonors have hailed Uganda as a major case of economic successin Africa. They have provided it with large amounts of financialassistance to support the implementation of reforms. High levelsof foreign aid have provided the government with public resourcesto sustain the patronage basis of the regime. Moreover, in acontext where wide discretionary authority was conferred ongoverning elites in the implementation of reforms, public resourcescould be used in unaccountable and non-transparent ways to helpthe government maintain its political dominance. The donorshave begun to realize belatedly that they have been proppingup a corrupt government in Uganda.     

Introduction 15th annual conference of the european association of law and economics, utrecht, the netherlands, september 1998

This issue of the International Review of Law and Economics contains a selection of papers presented at the 15^th Annual Conference of the European Association of Law and Economics (EALE). It was the first time that the annual conference of the EALE was held in the Netherlands. It took place at Utrecht, in September 1998.Approximately 40 papers were presented at the conference. Many of these papers were submitted to this issue of the International Review of Law and Economics, and we were obliged to face the difficult task of selection. In this task we were helped by anonymous referees, who deserve much credit for their delicate task. The issue opens with the text of the invited lecture by Chief Judge Richard Posner on “Employment Discrimination: Age Discrimination and Sexual Harassment.” After this lecture, seven refereed papers are published. They cover a wide range of topics and include theoretical and empirical approaches.The first two articles are empirical studies. In their article “The Dynamics of Pretrial Negotiation in France: Is there a Deadline Effect in the French Legal System?,” Bruno Deffains and Myriam Doriat provide empirical evidence on pretrial negotiation in France with the primary goal being to determine whether there is a deadline effect. Theoretical and experimental studies generally show that in pretrial litigation most claims are settled just before the negotiation deadline, i.e., at the door of the court. Using data on civil law conflicts in France, the authors demonstrate that although the out-of-court settlement rate is relatively low, a deadline effect exists in the French legal system. The article complements the theoretical and experimental literature in the field of pretrial negotiation and provides additional insights into the functioning of the legal system.The article “Modeling Crime and the Law Enforcement System” by Frank van Tulder and Abraham van der Torre presents a macroeconomic model of the Dutch criminal justice system. The empirical estimations show that demographic, social, and economic factors and the results of the law enforcement system influence the number of crimes. It is found that a rise in the clear-up rate reduces the crime rate, whereas the average term of imprisonment has a negative impact on violence. A growth in the number of young men, divorced persons, unemployed, drug addicts, and motor vehicles—each per capita—and a rise in income inequalities have a boosting effect on one or more types of crime.The third article by Michael Faure and Paul Fenn is concerned with the costs and benefits of making liability for accidents retroactive, given the availability of liability insurance. The authors distinguish between the injurer’s perceived risk that the standard of care applied by the courts will differ from his chosen level of care, where this perceived risk is based on precedent or current practice, and the genuine uncertainty that the standard of care may change in the future as a result of unknown developments in the technology of care. While the injurer’s probability distribution over liability may be the same in each of these cases, he may be far less confident about the reliability of the probability distribution as a guide to choice in the latter case. In principle, the risk of liability arising from an unknown standard of care could be transferred to a liability insurer through the purchase of occurrence coverage. However, in addition to the usual source of difficulty for insurance markets as a result of information asymmetry, insurers also may have distaste for ambiguity. The authors show that this could in some circumstances lead to market failure in the provision of occurrence policies. These welfare losses from inefficient risk sharing as a consequence of retroactivity must, therefore, be set against the potential welfare gains from improved incentives for injurers to seek out information on care technology, as well as the concerns over distributive justice.In their article “Unitary States and Peripheral Regions: A Model of Heterogeneous Spatial Clubs” Jean-Michel Josselin and Alain Marciano develop an analytical framework for understanding the limits of constitutional unity. Their microeconomic model of unitary states deals with two kinds of heterogeneity. First, preference distance or physical distance account for decreasing net benefits from expansion. Second, heterogeneity may involve a discontinuity in the spatial pattern of preferences: “Peripheral behaviors” threaten unity. The authors integrate such behaviors into the model and draw some lessons as to the nature of an optimal constitutional area, discussing in particular the status of peripheral regions.The fifth article by Benito Arrunada, entitled “The Provision of Non-Audit Services by Auditors: Let the Market Evolve and Decide,” searches for and defines efficient regulation of the provision of non-audit services by auditors to their audit clients. From an examination of the particular problems posed by these services, it is concluded that they reduce total costs, increase technical competence, and stimulate more intense competition. Furthermore, they do not necessarily damage auditor independence or the quality of non-audit services. This assessment leads to recommending that legislative policy should aim at facilitating the development and use of the safeguards provided by the free action of market forces. Particular emphasis is placed on the role played by fee income diversification and the enhancement, through disclosure rules, of market incentives to diversify. A rule of mandatory disclosure of client diversification is examined to facilitate the task of the market with regard to achieving the optimal degree of auditor independence.In the next article, Antony Dnes applies the economic analysis of law to examine recent proposals in England and Wales for the reform of the law affecting financial settlement following divorce. Two specific measures have been proposed to reduce judicial discretion: a mathematical formula (such as a rebuttable presumption to divide equally the whole pool of assets during divorce) to be applied in the absence of agreement between the parties, or the enforcement of prenuptial agreements. The author concludes that these measures should be welfare improving but would need to be forward looking and applied to marriages, rather than divorces.The last article by Niva Elkin-Koren and Eli Salzberger provides a look at the changing world of law with the emergence of cyberspace from the perspective of the economic approach to law. The authors argue that the Chicago paradigm cannot be of much help to analyze law in and of cyberspace. While cyberspace reduces the traditional causes of monopolies, it introduces new types of monopolies that are the consequence of control over technologies rather than of price and demand curves. Second, the strict correlation between markets and states does not exist in cyberspace. The authors equally point at the weaknesses of transaction cost analysis. The Coaseian analysis assumes a given state of technology and overlooks the correlation and reciprocity between technological developments and legal rules. The authors consider neoinstitutional law and economics as the most suitable framework for examining the changing world of cyberspace, but they suggest some refinements. Cyberspace invites a reassessment of the borders between markets and hierarchies and poses special challenges to the paradigmatic assumption of rational behavior.     

Animal-related fatalities--part I: characteristic autopsy findings and variable causes of death associated with blunt and sharp trauma

Animals may be responsible for an array of potentially lethal injuries. Blunt force injuries characteristically involve larger animals such as cattle or horses that may kick, crush, or trample a victim causing head and facial injuries. Farm workers in particular are at high risk of lethal injuries involving the head and torso. Significant blunt trauma may be found in vehicle occupants after collisions with large animals such as camels or moose. Rarely, zookeepers may be crushed by particularly massive animals such as elephants. Sharp force injuries usually involve carnivore bites, most often from dogs with a "hole and tear" pattern of wounding. Injuries from animals such as alligators and sharks may have a significant component of crushing. Incised wounds may result in death from exsanguination and air embolism. On occasion, blunt or sharp trauma from animal activity may be confused with postmortem damage or with inflicted injury from an assault.