评估兴边富民行动的实施效果:以内蒙古边境旗市为例的时间序列分析

在兴边富民行动开展10周年之际,评估兴边富民行动的实施效果具有重大的理论和现实意义。本文利用内蒙古边境旗市统计数据定量分析了兴边富民行动的实施效果。回归结果表明,总体而言内蒙古兴边富民行动实施效果并不令人满意,尽管第二产业获得加速发展,公路建设成效显著,也促进了边境地区的商品贸易,但基本上没有实现加速当地经济发展、加快改善农牧民生活水平的目的,而且卫生事业发展相对落后。     

延安时期我党廉政制度有效执行的经验及启示

制度的生命力在于执行。延安时期我党廉政制度的有效执行主要得益于法规制定中因势而易、系统配套,落实过程中领导带头、惩处严格,执行过程中改善环境、推行民主,执行机制上注重监督、大胆改革。这些历史经验启示我们,在廉政制度执行中法规是依据,过程是关键,环境是保障,机制是根本,只有从这四个方面着手才能切实提高执行力。     

《满洲评论》中的“满青联”与“协和会”

关于满洲青年联盟（简称＂满青联＂）是否是＂协和会＂前身的问题,学术界尚未有明确定论。从时期上而言,有倾向于＂协和会＂前身为自治指导部的说法。本文从《满洲评论》对＂满青联＂与＂协和会＂两机构的报道为线索,追踪两者之间的潜在联系。认为从组织形式与殖民教化功能上而言,基本上可以认定＂满青联＂与＂协和会＂的先行后续关系。     

18世纪中越边境贸易中的入越华商

中越边境贸易在18世纪达到一个高峰,早期以越人来商为主的情况发生变化,华商入越成为主流。入越华商主要由广西、云南边境地区的本土边民和其他外省商人构成,他们在中越贸易的过程中,逐渐当地化。华商的贸易活动对中越两国的经济社会发展均产生了深刻影响。     

略评苏联解体原因研究中的几种观点

雄踞世界70余年的苏联于20世纪末剧变、解体,成为中国学术界对苏-俄研究的一个新热点。现时我国学术界对苏联解体原因的研究没有突破研究方法、思路上的传统定式,因此用新理念、新方法探讨苏联剧变的研究成果十分少见,致使现今苏联解体原因研究相对滞后。     

我国工会制度的困境与出路——关于工会法实施情况的调查报告

随着社会主义市场经济的快速发展,各种社会关系也在发生深刻变化,突出表现在劳动关系的日益复杂和紧张.作为调整劳动关系,尤其是调整集体劳动关系的工会制度,已不能完全适应时代的发展.针对其存在的问题,找出完善的办法,是建立和谐劳动关系的必由之路.     

黄克功杀人案与陕甘宁边区的司法公正

黄克功杀人案发生在陕甘宁边区成立后不久。边区司法机关仅用六天时间,便完成了从案件的侦破、起诉到审理、判决和执行的所有程序,为陕甘宁边区的司法公正,从效率、民主与人权保护等方面,确立了标准。在缺乏明确的实体法及程序法规范的情况下,边区高等法院通过对此案的审理,创设了人民群众民主参与刑事案件的陪审制度和公审制度、边区高等法院对重大刑事案件一审终审的诉讼程序制度、法律适用主体的平等原则等重要制度,体现了边区在特定历史条件和战争环境下实现司法公正的独特方式,对革命法制的发展产生了巨大而深远的影响。     

Y chromosome STR haplotypes and allele frequencies in Illinois Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic males

POPULATION: Population: Illinois Caucasian ( n =117), Illinois African American ( n =218), and Illinois Hispanic ( n =68).     

Casting Aside Clanking Medieval Chains: Prerogative,Statute and Article 50 after the EU Referendum

This article confronts the controversies surrounding Article 50 by analysing the relationship between statute and prerogative in the UK. The piece focuses on domestic constitutional issues and suggests a new way of classifying the relationship between statute and prerogative into two types falling under ‘the abeyance principle’ or ‘the frustration principle’. The abeyance principle means that where statute and prerogative overlap, the prerogative goes into abeyance. The frustration principle means that where statute and prerogative give rise to potential inconsistencies, but do not overlap, the prerogative cannot be used inconsistently with the intention of parliament as expressed in the relevant legislation. It then argues that Article 50 has the status of primary or ‘primary‐equivalent’ legislation which could justify applying the abeyance principle. This would mean that the trigger power would be exercised on statutory authority rather than through prerogative powers. If the courts are unable thus to construe the relevant legislation it argues EU law requires the courts to bridge the gap. Alternatively, if the abeyance principle is not applicable, it argues the frustration principle could apply but the circumstances in this litigation fall outside it. In the further alternative, EU law could require the frustration principle itself to be set aside in this case.     

Ideological Neutrality in the Workplace

This note assesses the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV and Bougnaoui v Micropole SA, the first cases dealing with religious discrimination under the Equal Treatment Directive 2000/43. Both cases concerned Muslim women wishing to express their religious beliefs by wearing an Islamic headscarf while working in a private undertaking. The Court held that the employees’ dismissal could not be justified by reference to clients’ prejudices against the headscarf. However, dismissal could be justified if pursued on the basis of a corporate policy of ideological neutrality which prohibited all visible religious, political and philosophical symbols. This note criticises the latter part of the Court's decision for, inter alia, placing too much weight on an employer's freedom to run its business in spite of the grave effects this has on employees’ fundamental right to manifest their beliefs at work.