《法国民法典》中的婚姻家庭法之剖析

《法国民法典》是法国大革命的成果之一,但它并没有彻底割断历史,而是在革命的基础上对历史和传统的继承和妥协,尤其是在婚姻家庭法领域表现得十分突出,完全丧失了财产法领域以及债法领域中随处可见的自由、平等的革命精神。从传统的影响、启蒙思想家的影响和拿破仑个人的影响三方面剖析了其产生的原因。     

改善家族企业内部控制和内部管理的措施

本文通过对家族企业内部控制与公司治理弱化,经营控制权过于集中所导致问题的剖析,阐述了如何完善我国民营企业公司治理结构和内部控制制度、提高企业运作效率和会计信息质量等措施。     

谈中国《人口与计划生育法》的里程碑意义

实施人口生育法是人类社会发展到一定历史时期的必然选择。虽然 ,目前还没有出现统一的完整意义上的成熟的人口法 ,但是以调整人口关系某一侧面的单一的人口法规却已经被陆续制定出来。我国人口与计划生育法的颁布 ,标志着人类社会正在经历一次认识自身生命更替的新的社会变革 ,是人口生育行为规范的一次历史性转折。各级政府部门和广大人民群众要适应这一深刻的社会变革对自身提出的相应要求     

Maltreatment and Family Dysfunction in Childhood and the Subsequent Adjustment of Children and Adults

The adjustment problems associated with sexual abuse, physical abuse, psychological maltreatment, neglect, and witnessing family violence during childhood were examined in three studies. Study 1 demonstrated significant overlap between maltreatment types in parent reports (N = 50) of maltreatment experiences of their child aged 5–12 years. Parental sexual punitiveness, traditionality, family adaptability and family cohesion significantly predicted scores on 4 maltreatment scales and children's externalizing behavior problems. Level of maltreatment predicted internalizing, externalizing, and sexual behavior problems. In Study 2, significant overlap was found between adults' retrospective reports (N = 138) of all 5 types of maltreating behaviors. Parental sexual punitiveness, traditionality, family adaptability, and family cohesion during childhood predicted the level of maltreatment and current psychopathology. Although child maltreatment scores predicted psychopathology, childhood family variables were better predictors of adjustment. Study 3 demonstrated that child maltreatment scores predicted positive aspects of adult adaptive functioning (N = 95).     

唐代奴仆告主现象考论

唐代传世文献关于告主奴仆具体身份之描述扑朔迷离,且多有彰显奴仆＂家人＂身份之旨趣。告主家奴、家僮、役人、从人等称谓互通的特殊现象,是唐代家庭结构深刻变化与贱民地位相对提高的真实反映,而这种变化在法律制度层面之重要表达路径,即为奴仆容隐其主原则的确立。     

REEVALUATING WHERE WE STAND: A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF AMERICA'S FAMILY JUSTICE SYSTEMS

The call for court reform remains critical in the face of the growing complexity of burgeoning family law cases nationwide. Many states have restructured their court systems using the unified family court model, resolving legal, personal, emotional, and social disputes with the aim of improving the well‐being of families and children. Other states utilize the traditional approach, resulting in cases being handled in a fragmented, time‐consuming and expensive manner. In this article, Professor Barbara A. Babb presents the results of her nationwide survey regarding how each state handles family law matters. The survey is a follow‐up to her comprehensive 1998 survey and her 2002 survey update. The results of the recent analysis reveal that a total of thirty‐eight states now have either statewide family courts, family courts in selected areas of the state, or pilot or planned family courts, representing seventy‐five percent of states. The number of states without a specialized or separate system to handle family law matters has decreased from seventeen states in 1998 to thirteen in 2006. These changes are significant when one considers the complexities involved in court reform. The need for court reform remains an urgent one, as family law cases occupy a significant percentage of court dockets across the country. Families and children deserve a court system where justice is effective and efficient and where their legal, personal, emotional, and social needs are resolved in a therapeutic and holistic manner.     

生态位视角下我国家族企业治理探讨

借助生态学中的生态位理论分析我国家族企业治理问题,是一个全新的研究视角.生态位对我国家族企业治理具有重要影响,在生态位理论的基础上,通过对家族企业治理中的生态位约束进行分析,可以发现和提出改善我国家族企业治理的新思路.     

家庭的民事主体地位

家庭是一种独立的社会组织,为了自身的生存和履行其社会职能,家庭在客观上具有作为民事主体的必要性,事实上也已经是民事法律行为的实施者。家庭具有独立的意志和财产,在法理上具备作为民事主体的一般条件,现行的国内外法律也在一定程度上承认了家庭的民事主体地位。     

熵理论与家族企业管理改革

本文与一般企业管理论文相区别的一点是研究的范式不同,通过将热力学系统中的熵理论引入,从熵与负熵的角度去思考企业的管理原理,进而对有中国特色的家族企业管理进行了定性分析。     

IF A THREAT OF VIOLENCE IS PRESENTED,WHEN DOES THE LAW REQUIRE FAMILY MEDIATORS TO BREACH CONFIDENTIALITY?

For a family mediator to protect his client, a third party, and/or himself from unlawfully disclosing a client's admission, the family mediator should use the principles set forth in Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California when a threat of violence is presented by one of his clients, since many states have adopted these principles through case law and statute to protect third parties from acts of violence. The two most significant factors in determining whether to breach confidentiality are the identifiability of the victim and the likelihood of the potential physical harm. If a jurisdiction has not explicitly done so via statute, the family mediator should nonetheless follow these principles since they are likely to be adopted by that jurisdiction through case law, because the probability of a court's finding a special relationship between a family mediator and a client is relatively high.