中日韩技术创新能力的比较研究

从技术创新投入、技术创新产出、技术创新基础、技术创新效率方面对中日韩三国在2000年至2011年的技术创新能力进行了定量分析比较。研究发现日本的技术创新能力呈现出下降趋势，韩国的技术创新基础提高显著并且技术创新效率较高。我国的技术创新能力大幅度提高，技术创新投入和产出较高，但是技术创新基础还需要进一步提高。为中国的技术创新的持续性发展提供了一些政策性建议。     

在情理性传统中实现理性化使命——论中国传统价值观的现代化转型

西方文化以"理性"精神为主导,其率先步入现代化也与这种理性精神的普遍贯彻密不可分。相比之下,中国文化则以"情理"精神尤其是儒家的"血亲情理"为主导。由于两者之间的深度差异和张力冲突,中国社会如何在情理性的文化传统中完成理性化的历史使命,如何在肯定西方理性精神的现代意义的同时发挥中国情理精神的前现代-后现代意义,我们有必要通过"后儒家"的构想,探讨一条把中国传统的情理价值观加以现代化,以达成两种精神内在统一的可行途径。     

中国—东盟会计协调与欧盟会计协调比较研究

近年来,随着中国与东盟贸易、投资的不断增长,中国与东盟的会计协调显得越来越重要,但目前中国—东盟会计协调的进度明显滞后于双方经贸关系的发展。欧盟从20世纪60年代起就致力于会计协调工作,并取得了显著的成效。本文通过总结和比较中国—东盟会计协调与欧盟会计协调的历程,分析两者会计协调的差异,并提出欧盟的成功经验对实现中国—东盟会计协调的启示。     

对外开放与经济增长:中国与印度的比较——后冷战以来绩效与分析框架

本文以对外开放之经济增长效应为主线,从三个视角切入对后冷战以来中国和印度经济进行了比较,以期提出一个比较研究框架。三个视野分别为经济增长绩效视角、对外开放视角,以及开放之增长效应机理视角。分析显示,两国经济在后冷战以来都经历了快速增长,虽然印度经济增速慢于中国,但其稳定性更高,人均国民收入与中国的差距要小于名义经济总量(GDP)的差距。在对外开放方面,中国外贸与引进外资绩效明显,而印度在服务业出口和服务业利用外资方面则略胜于中国。在开放与增长联系及效应机理方面,虽然可以利用主流经济学提出的模型,但具体到中国和印度,应根据各自特点进行具体化修改。     

医疗损害鉴定研究：江苏模式与北京模式比较——基于《侵权责任法》的视角分析

《侵权责任法》实施后我国并没有形成统一的医疗损害鉴定制度。江苏和北京高级法院分别对医疗损害鉴定的具体内容及部分具体鉴定制度进行了明确规定。二者最大的区别在于对医学会鉴定和法医鉴定这两种鉴定模式的优先选择不同。江苏模式优先选择医学会组织的医疗损害鉴定。能够从专业的角度保障医疗损害鉴定工作的完成．但建议加大力度完善医疗损害鉴定的监督机制及省属范围内的异地鉴定制度。北京模式则相对倾向医疗损害司法鉴定。建议完善医疗损害鉴定人的准入制度及医疗损害司法鉴定程序并构建医疗损害司法鉴定专家库。医疗损害司法鉴定制度构建过程中,建议遵循医疗损害鉴定统一性、专业性、标准化及监督的原则。     

A Tale of Two Debtors: Responding to the Shock of Over‐Indebtedness in France and England – a Story from the Trente Piteuses

England and France have developed distinct treatment systems to address the shock of a substantial increase in over‐indebted individuals since the mid‐1980s. In France, Over‐Indebtedness Commissions, with the Bank of France playing a central role in their management, now dominate the system. A more fragmented system of private and public providers of remedies developed in England, with innovation driven by private actors modifying existing commercial procedures and increased access to bankruptcy relief a side‐effect of government promotion of entrepreneurialism. This article explains the differences between these countries in terms of the influence of interest groups, including state actors, and ideologies. Historical contingency also plays a role. The distinct responses were not hard‐wired to legal origins and the article argues that analysis of the interaction of interest groups, state actors and ideology in shaping institutions, which in turn structure future change, provides a productive approach for future comparative research in this area.     

Die Ausgaben der Schweizer Kantone ‐ Eine Fuzzy Set QCA

The paper investigates the factors influencing the 26 Swiss Cantons' government expenditures. While the question has been subject to various statistical analyses, the present study has an alternative focus by adopting a configurative perspective. We take the findings of the 2002‐study by Vatter and Freitag, as our point of departure and re‐analyse their significant variables with regard to their combined impact using updated data from 2000 to 2006 and employing Fuzzy Set QCA. The results underline the important effect of monetary transfers from the federation thus corroborating the Flypaper Effect thesis from Economic Theory.     

权利冲突的解决——由一则案例引发的对公权力与私权利冲突的思考

权利必然以利益为前提,当法律规定的权利边界具有模糊性的情形下,为了减少和消除公权力与私权利的社会利益冲突,在进行利益的权衡和价值的选择时,应努力使法律所确认的个人权利的内容和社会整体利益的需要相一致。     

Transnationalisation, Orientalism and Crime

The paper begins with the question: how applicable are European and North American criminological theories to the situation in Asia? It takes a transnational and comparative perspective in relating contemporary and historical trends in crime, crime definition and crime control in a variety of Asian countries that comprise the so-called Confucian sphere. It provides a criminological critique of the ‘Asian values debate’ and, through an analysis of trends in crime, crime definition and crime control in China and Japan, of organised crime across the region, as well as selected examples of state-organised crime, seeks to provide a perspective on the developing criminological discourses of ‘the Orient’. The paper argues that, although cultural aspects are important and interesting in understanding the crime situation in the region, ultimately it is changes in politics and governance, economy and society that are most efficacious in explaining current criminological trends and developments.     

比较法视野下自裁管辖权原则的理论探讨

自裁管辖权原则是被世界各国仲裁立法与实践普遍接受的仲裁原则,但存在不同的理解与应用。本文通过比较研究,在厘清自裁管辖权原则基本涵义的基础上,对该原则的本质属性进行剖析,探讨了仲裁庭对仲裁管辖权具有终局决定权的合理性。