对高校图书馆勤工助学管理工作的思考——以浙江警察学院图书馆勤工助学为例

近年来,随着社会的进步以及高校图书馆的发展建设,大学生对图书馆勘工助学的热情高涨。文章结合我校图书馆开展勤工助学活动的作用,分析了勤工助学过程中存在的一些问题,并提出了相应的对策及思考,以进一步提高勘工助学工作的效益。     

囚在富士康——富士康准军事化工厂体制调查报告

富士康准军事化的工厂管理体制其本质是劳动的严重异化,本文以马克思主义的劳动价值观为理论视角,根据第一手实证资料调查研究了富士康的生产管理体制,发现它与马克思对早期资本主义原始积累的观察是一致的,其绝对剩余价值的生产同样是通过延长劳动时间、克扣工人工资以及制造各种形态的血汗劳动来实现的。富士康工人感觉工厂像监狱,其原因在于富士康着力打造了一个以绝对服从和惩罚性的制度为特征的法家式兵营社会。     

扭住核心战斗力关节 推进公安信息化建设

加强公安机关核心战斗力建设,既是公安现实斗争及其系统建设的重要目标与方法取向,也是在新的起点上扎实推进公安信息化建设的重要立论根据与实践基础。要把握核心战斗力实质推进公安信息化建设,要突破核心战斗力关节统筹公安信息化建设,要扭住核心战斗力机制优化公安信息化建设。     

社会应急能力建设与志愿服务法制发展——应急志愿服务是社会力量参与突发事件应对工作的重大课题

透过巨灾应对工作经验可以看出政府应急与社会应急的不同角色和分工;志愿者在"5.12"地震救援和灾后重建中发挥着不可忽视的重要作用;我国的社会应急能力建设与志愿服务法制发展面临着一系列亟待研究解决的课题,专题调查获得的研究结论证明了相关问题的普遍性和严重性;鉴于此,从志愿服务法制、社会动员法制和公共应急法制的发展方向以及我国实际出发,应思考加强社会应急能力建设和完善应急志愿服务立法的若干对策。     

晚近国际投资争端解决实践之评判:“全球治理”理论的引入

晚近国际投资争端的性质已由以往的政治性争端转变为现行的管理性争端,相应地,国际投资争端的传统外交保护解决方式也已为国际仲裁方式所取代,而且国际投资争端仲裁实践出现了明显的偏袒外国投资者,损害东道国权益之倾向。就此,已难以用传统的南北矛盾理论框定,而现有的商事仲裁理论和国内公法理论则存在着不同程度的缺失,需要引入一种视野更为宽广的全球治理理论予以弥补。     

地方政府与企业环境治理合作关系的形成——以太湖流域水污染防治为例

政府对企业环境行为的监管一直面临着三个挑战:由于信息不对称带来的交易成本过高,企业的环境成本与收益不确定,监管方成为被监管方的"俘虏"。在环境危机的压力下,地方政府采取了运动式的环境治理方式,企业面临着不确定的环境管制。地方政府与企业之间往往形成了"同谋"和"零和"关系。在目前中国环境管理制度框架下,地方政府与企业之间能否形成合作关系?本文以太湖流域水污染防治为案例,探索可能的路径和政策选择。     

论科层制管理体制及其对侦查的影响

因适应社会分工而出现的各种正式组织被统称为科层制。科层制管理体制的特点是：具有明确的职权等级、具有稳定的规章制度、采取的是卷宗管理制度。科层制管理体制与侦查活动具有一致性和矛盾性的相互关系。科层制管理体制对侦查的影响是：第一,科层管理体制有助于实现侦查行为的整体逻辑理性;第二,科层管理体制中的执行层和决策层之间可能出现紧张关系;第三,科层管理体制可能形成僵化和形式主义,降低侦查工作的灵活性和快速反应性。     

Strategy and Selection in International Relations

It is widely recognized that many of the samples we use for statistical analysis in international politics are the result of some selection process. Not surprisingly, selection models are becoming increasingly popular. At the same time, the role of strategic interaction has begun to play a more important role in statistical analyses. However, it has not been clear how statistical strategic models and selection models relate to each other, or what the effects are of employing one when the other is the more appropriate model. In this article, I 1) clarify why international relations scholars cannot shield themselves from selection bias simply by assuming their results are limited to a given sample; 2) show how recent statistical strategic models relate to traditional selection models and generalize the two sets of models by deriving a correlated strategic model; and 3) examine the effects of misspecifying either correlated errors or strategic interaction. My results indicate that failure to model the strategic interaction produces worse specification error than failure to account for correlated disturbances. In fact, traditional bivariate probit models appear to be superior only when states are almost completely uncertain about each others' preferences.     

Conflict dynamics and agonistic dialogue on historical violence: a case from Indonesia

This article contends that the type of high-level political consensus needed to reach a peace agreement is often insufficient for rebuilding and transforming wider social relations. Consensus-focused processes tend to suppress divergent views and experiences of conflict, particularly among grassroots conflict actors, and risk deepening social divides by homogenising diverse memories of past violence, with potentially dangerous consequences. In response to these concerns this article advances an understanding of agonistic dialogue and explores an example of such dialogue in communal conflict in Indonesia. Building on an understanding of effective dialogue as sustained, intensive and relational, this article also underscores the need for effective dialogue to have politico-institutional support and to be locally driven and owned by actors who are legitimate and trusted in the eyes of conflict protagonists.     

Expectations from Administrative Reforms: An Attempt to Implement the Balanced Scorecard in a Public Sector Organization

The aim of this case study is to explore what actors in a Swedish municipality expect from a new administrative reform (i.e., an attempt to implement the Balanced Scorecard). The findings show that the expectations on changes are highest among the politicians, moderate among the administrators, and lowest among the operative employees. The differences can be explained by the way the reform is anticipated to favor or disfavor the actors, who in turn are influenced by the actors' past experiences. Most of the expressed expectations concern expectations of the outcome of the administrative reform, but some concern expectations on the reform itself.