历代王朝治瑶赋役政策的社会历史分析

历代王朝治理瑶民的赋役政策基本上是一脉相承的 ,大致为一种减免赋役负担的优惠政策 ,且随着时间的推移逐步走向系统与完备 ,但其中也杂有曲折和反复。这种演变正是民族关系发展的晴雨表和外在表现 ,其背后有着深刻的社会历史根源。概括起来 ,其发生与演变是以下四个方面的因素共同作用的结果 :其一 ,王朝的处境 ;其二、瑶民的处境 ;其三、双边往来 ,其四、政治博弈。反观历史上的治瑶赋役制度等经济政策 ,可以为我国更好地实施民族区域自治提供有益的借鉴。     

第二波改革的起跑线——印尼苏西洛总统2010年国情咨文评析

印尼总统苏西洛2010年年度国情咨文颇具新意.咨文不仅回顾和总结了过去一年印尼发展中的得失,还梳理了印尼进入民主转型时期以来的成就和问题,明确提出印尼已进入第二波改革的新阶段.咨文强调为确保第二波改革的成功,印尼应加速发展,建立起富强、民主、公正三大支柱.咨文还提出印尼要实行"全方位外交",拓展更加广阔的外交空间.     

美韩同盟再定义与韩国的战略选择:进程与争论

本文系统总结了自2002年底以来美韩同盟再定义的磋商过程,以及双方在驻韩美军基地调整、同盟内部军事安全角色分工、同盟的未来战略构想等三大焦点问题上所取得的实质性进展,认为通过区域扩展和内涵扩展的路径选择,美韩同盟再定义已基本实现利益平衡与威胁平衡的双重目标。通过对美韩全球性战略同盟关系的定位与确认,韩国也由此结束了数年来激烈的外交方向辩论,再度确立了中近期亲美的结盟外交路线,然而有关韩国对外战略的争论不会就此终结。     

Taking Cantonal Variations of Integration Policy Seriously — or How to Validate International Concepts at the Subnational Comparative Level

Abstract: Subnational varieties of immigrant integration policy, which are particularly salient in federal states, remain largely neglected by migration studies. Following Lijphart, who long demanded to verify international research at the subnational level, this study aims at capturing subnational policy variations using the example of Swiss cantons. In line with international approaches, cantonal integration policies are conceptualized and measured in terms of immigrants’ ease or difficulty of access to civic, political, socio‐structural, as well as cultural and religious rights and obligations. The transfer of an international concept to the subnational level facilitates a validation of the former, which constitutes a second neglected research field. Finally, a look at the empirical evidence allows testing the construct validity of our measurement: in line with theoretical assumptions, our data reveal a clear linguistic divide, an institutionalised “Röschtigraben”, with German speaking cantons exhibiting overall more restrictive policies than Latin cantons.     

中国—东盟区域经济一体化趋势下的税收竞争与中国的政策选择

中国—东盟自由贸易区(CAFTA)的全面启动为"10+1"组合带来了大量的实惠,但不可否认的是,关税减免承诺无法抵消在国家利益驱使下的中国与东盟各成员国之间的税收竞争。CAFTA框架下,面对东盟国家日益激烈的税收竞争,中国应当采取何种措施积极参与其中,在充分保证国家经济利益的同时又避免卷入有害税收竞争的漩涡,值得我们深入研究。     

The Patients’ Rights Directive (2011/24/EU) – Providing (some) rights to EU residents seeking healthcare in other Member States

This article presents the main elements of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, commonly known as the Patient’s Rights Directive. It is the latest EU initiative with regard to European Health Care and the Single Market. The main elements of the Directive contain provisions related to the prior authorisation of health care in another Member State, the reimbursement of such health care and the removal of unjustified obstacles to achieving these aims.These provisions largely reflect the recent case law of the European Court of the Justice (ECJ). Amongst these are provisions involving the use of personal data. Such provisions will engage data protection issues and will have to be carried out according to the data protection directives. Alongside this primary aim of codifying ECJ case law the Patient’s Rights Directive also introduces novel initiatives aimed at fostering cross border cooperation between various elements of national healthcare systems.Part 1 of this contribution will describe the legal basis and the aims of the PRD, Part 2 will describe the principle obligations placed on the Member States with regard to reimbursement, Parts 3 and 4 will describe other informational and procedural requirements placed upon the Member States of Treatment and Affiliation. Finally Part 5 will outline some of the novel initiatives that have been included in the PRD.The increases in the frequency of cross border-treatment that this directive attempts to facilitate are likely to see a concurrent increase in cross-border patient information flows. Such data flows will be subject to the Union’s provisions on Data Protection. It remains uncertain whether the EU’s Data Protection regime will act as inhibitor to cross-border medical treatment or rather represent a gold standard that allows patients to engage in such activities with peace of mind. The Patient’s Rights Directive will form part of the EU’s future e-Health strategy which envisages a large increase in the fluidity of patient data. A discussion of this directive is therefore merited in this journal.     

公共政策仿真方法:原理、应用与前景

从方法论的视角讨论了公共政策仿真的ABM方法原理、应用和前景。学界就社会科学研究应该遵循的方法论问题一直存在着不同取向的争论,在就此形成的认识论连续统的框架下,社会仿真的诸多概念模型也都有各自在"通则论-个体论"的连续统中的位置,而目前公共政策仿真的ABM方法无疑在这样的连续统中占据着重要地位。公共政策过程的复杂性制约了传统研究方法的效果,而基于场景分析的公共政策系统分析和基于机制的政策主体行为分析使公共政策仿真的ABM方法突破了传统研究方法的窠臼,通过科学的建模技术以及严谨的检验环节,结合政策结果的3D场景呈现和群决策平台,为公共政策领域开创了独具科学性和人本性的激动人心的应用前景。     

后危机时代跨国公司对华投资行为变化与我国外资政策调整

受全球金融危机的影响,跨国公司对华投资行为发生了很大的变化,它们大多采取缩减资本支出、控制生产成本和撤资裁员等应对之策.这些变化对我国的外资政策构成巨大的挑战,为抵御金融危机带来的不利影响,我国政府提出了一揽子振兴经济的政策措施,而外资政策是其中重要的组成部分.在后危机时代,我国政府需要重新思考与定位外资政策的走向,以便在未来更好地应对跨国公司对华投资的新变化.     

专利侵权行为犯罪化的边缘性审视

专利领域由刑法规制的犯罪目前只有假冒他人专利罪,更为常见的侵犯专利权人独占实施权的行为一直被置于民事救济和行政救济的保护下,专利侵权行为犯罪化的问题值得探讨。以犯罪圈的划定、被害人的权益保护和刑事政策的指导为视角来进行专利侵权犯罪化的边缘性审视,应限制性地设置侵犯专利罪,将情节严重的专利侵权行为纳入刑法的规制。     

工具、治理、客观实存——政策网络的三个维度

政策网络首先是客观实在,其次是理论分析的工具,再次是作为一种价值判断,才应是公共治理的新模式。因此,政策网络含有三个维度：作为政策运行的客观实在,关系型社会的现实使中国的决策过程存在于＂人格化结构＂非常明显的复杂政策关系网中;作为理论分析的典型范式,考虑个体间博弈、制度规约,建立包括制度、结构、个体博弈要素的政策网络概念模型;作为公共治理的理想状态,协商民主机制的建立健全与公民社会充分发展是其走向现实的必要条件。