国外科技法制对我国科技立法的启示

随着科学技术在经济发展中的地位不断提高,科技立法成为各国重要任务之一。美国、法国、日本等国外科技法制,在管理法制化、科技评估制度、科技人员管理机制、科技税收优惠制度等方面,对我国科技立法的完善均有借鉴作用。     

诉讼证明标准构造新论

在案件事实认定中,证明标准起着直接衡量全案证据链条复合证明力能否合理合法地推导出案件事实的重要作用。其结构基本都是由＂质＂与＂量＂两部分要素组成,我国诉讼法对证明标准的规定缺乏体系性和完整性,有必要借鉴国外成功经验加以完善。     

心脏肌钙蛋白T、I与心肌损伤及其法医学应用前景

心脏肌钙蛋白T、I具有很高的心脏特异性,敏感性高,能检测多种不同的心肌损伤,区别心肌损伤和骨骼肌损伤,并能用作心肌损害的危险程度分级和判断预后的指标,在临床上得到了广泛的应用。在法医学上也有一定的应用前景。     

Embutramide,a Component of Tanax®(T‐61) as a New Drug of Abuse?

Tanax^®(T‐61) is a euthanasia solution commonly used in veterinary medicine in Europe. It consists of three active components: embutramide, mebezonium iodide, and tetracaine hydrochloride. Human consumption of Tanax^®(T‐61) is usually associated with suicide attempts. In our 15‐year‐long practice, embutramide was detected only three times but within a short period. First, it was found in the urine of a 42‐year‐old veterinarian, and the other two observations were made in a 16‐year‐old young man. Urine samples were analyzed using Shimadzu Prominence TOX.I.S.II. HPLC–DAD system with online SPE extraction system. Both of the two patients denied any intention to die. These cases show that this veterinary drug may also be considered as potential drugs of abuse.     

OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS BY VICTIMS OF CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE TO MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: A CONFRONTATION CLAUSE ANALYSIS

Acknowledging the rapid growth of child sexual abuse in the United States, this Note advocates for the recognition of a limited exception to the blanket-hearsay ban on out-of-court statements made by unavailable declarants set out by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. Washington . In order to protect a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation right, Crawford requires that hearsay evidence that is "testimonial" in nature be deemed inadmissible if the witness is unavailable and the defendant does not have a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness against him. However, Crawford noted that, where nontestimonial hearsay is at issue, cross-examination may not be necessary. Accordingly, where a child sexual abuse victim makes statements during a structured or semi-structured forensic interview to a member of a multidisciplinary team, these statements should be deemed nontestimonial and thus admitted into evidence, without requiring cross-examination of the child. Allowing for this exception to the general hearsay ban in Crawford is not only consistent with current precedent, but it is also warranted to promote public policy and to curb the negative impact such abuse has on society.     

百令胶囊对早期糖尿病肾病患者细胞免疫功能的影响

目的:探讨百令胶囊治疗早期糖尿病肾病(diabetic nephropathy, DN)的作用机制.方法:将60例早期DN患者随机分为百令胶囊组和福辛普利组各30例,治疗3个月.在治疗前后用流式细胞仪检测T细胞亚群,用放射免疫法检测白介素-2(interleukin-2, IL-2)水平.结果: 治疗前福辛普利组和百令胶囊组患者血清IL-2水平、CD4+细胞百分率和CD4+/CD8+比值显著低于正常对照组(P＜0.01),CD8+细胞百分率显著高于正常对照组(P＜0.01).与治疗前比较,福辛普利组和百令胶囊组患者血清IL-2水平、CD4+细胞百分率显著升高(P＜0.01).百令胶囊组患者血清IL-2水平、CD4+细胞百分率显著高于福辛普利组(P＜0.01).结论:调节T淋巴细胞亚群和IL-2水平可能是百令胶囊治疗早期DN的重要机制之一.     

利用步法特征进行人身识别的研究

众所周知,穿鞋足迹的情况分析在刑事案件现场勘察检验中占有相当的比重和地位,而对步法特征的分析又是重中之重。不管是同一人的步幅特征还是步态特征,都具有一定的稳定性,而不同人的步幅特征和步态特征是存在差异的。我们通过对一定数量的穿鞋油墨捺印足迹进行研究,用概率论及数理统计的知识对实验数据进行处理:通过T实验法检验实验对象的各个相应指标的标准差之间的近似,证明了同一人步法特征的稳定表现;通过U实验法检验不同实验对象之间各个相应指标的差异,从而论证了不同人在步法特征表现方面的差异。     

当前甘南藏区社会稳定问题研究——以国内安全保卫工作为视角

3.14事件后,甘南藏区社会的不稳定因素日趋增多,反分裂斗争更加尖锐复杂。当前,影响甘南藏区社会稳定的主要因素既有达赖集团及其分裂势力的分裂活动、复杂的民族宗教关系、宗教渗透等已被国内安全保卫部门所关注的传统因素,又有经济问题、人口流动、生态环境恶化、自然灾害等非传统领域的因素,并且各个因素之间相互影响、相互转化。甘南藏区的国内安全保卫工作应与宗教管理等部门的工作有机结合起来,加强针对该地区的专项社情调查研究,建立有效的预防控制机制。     

原发性高血压中医证型与血管紧张素原 M235T基因多态性相关性

目的 探讨原发性高血压(essential hypertension,EH)不同中医证型与血管紧张素原(angiotensinogen,AGT)M235T基因多态性的相关性.方法 选择EH患者120例,辨证分型分别为肝火亢盛型、阴虚阳亢型、阴阳两虚型、痰湿壅盛型,并选取正常人30例作为对照组,采用聚合酶链反应(poly...     

Civil Rights and Social Welfare: Some Thoughts on the Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall

This article draws on T H Marshall's celebrated classification of civil, political and social rights to examine the use of the courts by individuals seeking to establish rights to particular forms or models of welfare service provision. It argues that tensions between the collective and individual aspects of social rights, the relationship of social rights to inequality, and the difficulty of quantifying (and therefore enforcing) legitimate expectations, all make the use of litigation to establish social rights intensely problematic. Drawing on the recent UK Supreme Court case of R (on the Application of McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, it goes on to suggest that it is unhelpful to think of social rights in terms of human rights: instead, we would do better to adopt Marshall's emphasis on the citizenship basis of social rights and on the social and political context within which they necessarily exist.