蒙古国知识产权制度分析

在世界已经进入知识经济时代的背景下,对中蒙两国在著作权法、商标法及地理标志、专利法上的具体规定进行详细的比较分析,总结了蒙古国知识产权制度的特点,并提出在中蒙两国国际贸易中我国应该采取的对策。     

中蒙关系发展中的大国因素探微

中蒙关系的发展不是一帆风顺的,但睦邻友好始终是两国关系发展的主流。由于蒙古处于特殊地理位置,其外交关系发展不可避免地受到美、俄、日等世界主要大国的影响,并进而影响中蒙关系的发展。     

中、俄、蒙三国的油气合作

中国处于石油资源相对贫乏的东亚西太平洋区域,总体石油资源不足;俄罗斯东西伯利亚和远东地区的石油和天然气储量丰富,蒙古石油矿藏集中在中蒙两国边界地区,这为中、俄、蒙的油气合作提供了可能,并且从蒙古直接穿过进入中国的中俄石油管道是最近、最安全的线路。从未来发展的趋势看,中国可积极利用俄蒙的资源投资与合作,参与输气、输油管道的建设,拓宽和夯实中俄油气合作的经济基础。     

中蒙国际贸易依存度比较分析

蒙古国计划经济时期与转型时期的对外贸易依存度都较高,但计划经济时期对外贸易依存度保护相对稳定,转型时期的对外贸易依存度周期性波动特征明显;中国已经成为蒙古国最为重要的贸易顺差来源国,双边进出口贸易的相互依赖程度存在不断提高的趋势,波动性较强,面临不平衡性和波动性双重风险;通过双边或者多边贸易协定可以稳定双边贸易关系并控制贸易风险。     

蒙古国“多支点”外交政策及其对我周边安全环境的影响

前苏联解体后,蒙古国基于自身实际构建的“多支点”全方位外交政策,已经对我北部战略安全环境产生了一定影响,分析蒙古国外交政策的动因、走向及其趋向,制订符合我国国家利益的应对措施,已经成为当前国家战略的一项重要课题。     

蒙古国政治转型与新政府的走向

蒙古国政治与经济转型同步,这对处于民主改革进程中的国家具有借鉴意义。蒙古国政治与经济的发展对于东北亚区域经济合作的发展无疑具有重要影响。     

内蒙古产品地理标志保护的现状、特征及其发展思路

内蒙古地理标志保护工作起步较晚,但发展迅速。截止2010年12月31日,内蒙古地区通过国家农业部、国家质检总局和国家商标局三种认证途径共取得了35件地理标志注册。内蒙古地区在地理标志保护工作中存在着如下不足：保护模式单一,人文因素产品不受重视,区域发展不平衡。保护品种不全面．涵盖范围过窄,国际市场没有得到应有的开拓。针对以上问题,内蒙古地区地理标志保护工作应从以下几个方面着手：积极实施整体发展战略,实现地理标志控制主体的科学化,建立地理标志保护的考评和奖励制度。与绿色食品的发展思路相结合。     

Institutional exclusion as a destabilizing factor: the mass unrest of 1 July 2008 in Mongolia

The paper discusses the 1 July 2008 mass protest in Mongolia. This event has no precedent in Mongolian history and represents a challenge for the social sciences as neither scholars nor political leaders predicted or even admitted its eventuality. Several forms of exclusion – economic, social and institutional – are considered as its potential source. It is argued that the theory of institutional exclusion allows making better sense of the situation. Institutional exclusion means the alienation of ordinary people from government and their inability to rely on the law and official procedures when being engaged in everyday activities. Two sources of primary data inform the analysis: a series of structured interviews with the protesters (N?=?20) and a collection of visual records made during the unrest (N?=?244). The data were processed using methods of both qualitative and quantitative content analysis.     

Ephemeral ‘communities’: spatiality and politics in rangeland interventions in Mongolia

In recent years, the number of community-based natural resource management projects for rangeland conservation and development has grown rapidly in Mongolia. Such projects seek to develop social capital through the formation of herder groups and pasture user groups, in order to enable the coordination of complex, collective tasks needed for sustainability. Through analysis of social networks, interviews and ethnographic data from two places where such projects have been implemented, Bayanjargalan, Dundgovi, and Tariat, Arkhangai, the paper demonstrates that the spatiality of pastoral social relations is much more extensive than assumed by these projects. Furthermore, rather than being neutral technical interventions, such projects are embedded in and proliferate politics. They often bolster the informal power of wealthy herders who gain more access to pasture, while at the same time leading to tensions between different levels of government and becoming objects of struggle between Mongolia’s two dominant political parties. For all of these reasons, these efforts have tended not to build trust, and the ‘communities’ they create, in the form of herder groups and pasture user groups, have tended to be ephemeral.