Patriarchy,Abortion, and the Criminal System: Policing Female Bodies

This paper argues for a broader consideration of the issue of abortion—one that stresses the centrality of the denial of reproductive rights in the patriarchal policing of women’s bodies and their sexuality. Globally, the estimates of abortion-related deaths in 2014 ranged from 22,500 to 44,000, and countless women are injured or left infertile by seeking illegal abortions. We briefly review international trends regarding abortion politics and then analyze closely women’s access to abortion in two countries: the United States and Bangladesh. Representing two very different contexts of the developed and the developing world, respectively, we contend that abortion services are being constrained by misogynistic politics that deny women control over their bodies. Finally, the paper reviews recent international efforts to establish abortion rights as part of a broader landscape of human rights. Notably, while there are some efforts in the global north to recriminalize both contraception and abortion, these practices have been characterized by a recent United Nation’s report as the deliberate denial of medically available and necessary services and hence a form of “torture.”     

刑罚的人道性与审判时自然流产妇女的死刑适用

本文从刑罚人道主义出发 ,认为对审判时自然流产的妇女也以“怀孕的妇女”看待 ,不能适用死刑 ,是我国刑法的进步。     

PUBLIC OPINION REACTION TO REPEATED EVENTS: Citizen Response to Multiple Supreme Court Abortion Decisions

While numerous works explores how single events or political actions affect public opinion, almost no research explores how this effect evolves with repeated actions. The Conditional Response Model holds that while elite actors can influence and polarize the public when they first act on an issue, subsequent action will not have this same effect. We challenge this model based on its depiction of psychological models of attitude formation and change. Instead of focusing on the number of times an actor has addressed an issue, we argue that the state of public opinion is the key to determining how the public will react to multiple elite actions over a long timeframe. We examine how the public reacted to multiple Supreme Court decisions on abortion. Our results suggest that the Conditional Response Model does a poor job of depicting public opinion and that actors are not limited in their influence by the number of previous actions on an issue.     

避孕方法知情选择与人工流产的关系

自开展避孕节育方法的知情选择工作以来,基层干部所面临的一个主要问题就是知情选择是否会影响到人工流产的发生,这个问题限制了部分地区避孕节育方法知情选择工作的开展,直接影响到妇女权利的获得与实现。通过研究发现,在知情选择的起步阶段,人工流产率会有所上升,但通过改善服务质量、促进群众知情之后,人工流产率开始降低。     

Euthanasia in the new born： doubts and interrogations

The debates on euthanasia are quite common nowadays, but few refer to euthanasia in newborns. But the day-to-day medical activities pose a lot of questions about the medical treatments of premature or newborn infants （with severe malformations which were not detected during pregnancy）. What is the criminal liability of the doctor in case of omission of treatment in newborns with severe birth defects？ The work will focus on an analysis of crimes of abortion, the omission of medical treatment and murder and injuries. At last I will try to identify the main trends to find a solution to the different situations-such as injury of the fetus in utero, the omission of treatment of newborns with severe malformations and the omission of basic health care of infants with minor malformations.     

中药序贯疗法联合克龄蒙治疗人工流产术致月经过少疗效观察

目的 观察中药序贯疗法联合克龄蒙治疗人工流产术后月经过少的临床疗效。方法 将60例人工流产术致月经过少患者随机分成对照组和治疗组,每组30例,治疗组给予中药序贯用药联合克龄蒙口服,对照组仅给予克龄蒙口服,疗程均为3个月经周期。观察两组患者治疗前后月经量和卵泡早期性激素［促卵泡激素（follicle stimulating hormone,FSH）、黄体生成素（luteotropic hormone,LH）、雌二醇（estradiol,E2）水平。结果 治疗组临床疗效明显优于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗组患者月经量增加程度明显高于对照组（P<0.05）;两组患者治疗后血清FSH水平较治疗前均明显下降（P<0.05）、E2水平均明显上升（P<0.05）,两组患者治疗前后FSH、E2差值比较,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 中药序贯疗法联合克龄蒙治疗能显著增加人工流产术致月经过少患者的月经量。     

人工流产:权利抑或义务——女性主义视角下中美堕胎法比较研究

美国法上妇女堕胎权是宪法上保护的权利,但各州政府有权对此进行规范、限制甚至在一定条件下禁止。中国法上妇女享有充分的堕胎权,仅禁止选择性别的人工流产,但在计划生育国策下,有时人工流产成为义务,妇女的生殖健康也被漠视甚至受到侵害。以妇女为中心,保障妇女的堕胎自主决定权与生殖健康是女性主义对人工流产的法律进路。     

Constitutional limitations of the privacy framework advanced in Eisenstadt v. Baird and Roe v. Wade

This paper examines the role of framing in advancing a progressive sexual and reproductive rights agenda. U.S. Supreme Court decisions including Griswold v. Connecticu and Eisenstadt v. Baird helped establish legal precedent invoking a ＂privacy framework＂ for subsequent cases including Roe v. Wade （as well as Doe v. Bolton and, more recently, Lawrence v. Texas）. This paper highlights the limitations of the privacy framework while exploring more potentially efficacious frames.     

价值体系中的堕胎规制——生命权与自我决定权、国家利益的宪法考量

堕胎的规制模式大致可分为国家放任模式、国家许可模式和有限制的国家放任模式。这些模式的背后都有着自身的一些独特考量,模式的选取与其社会传统、对胎儿是否为人、宪法权利是否具有积极性、国家是否负有某种保护义务等诸多因素的认知密切相关。目前我国基本上是放任孕妇堕胎。然而,宪法却要求国家履行其对生命的保护义务。鉴于法律应该在社会现实和价值诉求之间寻求合理的互动和对话,我国应该在保护胎儿的生命、孕妇的自我决定权以及国家利益之间进行更为适当的权衡,对我国所施行的堕胎规制模式做出适当的调整。