公司特别清算制度探析

公司特别清算是指公司在进行普通清算的过程中出现障碍,或者公司负债有超过资产的嫌疑,在法院直接干预和债权人参与下进行的清算。构建我国公司特别清算制度应合理界定特别清算程序的适用对象和开始原因,采用以法院为主导的立法模式,加强对债权人利益的保护。     

人民调解协议的合同效力

上世纪末,人民调解制度对于社会纠纷的解决起到了重要的作用。但进入新世纪后,调解率较之诉讼率迅速下降,这与人们的诉讼意识增强有很大关系,同时与调解协议的性质和效力不明有更主要的关系。本文对调解协议的合同效力构成及在审判过程中如何看待调解协议的合同效力等问题进行了阐述。     

论《纽约公约》与仲裁协议的法律适用——兼评中国加入《纽约公约》二十年的实践

《纽约公约》第2条关于仲裁协议书面形式的规定构成了统一实体规则,该规则应优先于国内法加以适用。对涉及仲裁协议实质有效性的问题,各缔约国法院在“裁决后诉讼”中应按照《公约》第5条第1款（甲）项的统一冲突规范确定准据法;在“裁决前诉讼”中应类推适用《公约》第5条第1款（甲）项的统一冲突规范。对“双无仲裁协议”,则由缔约国自行确定其实质有效性的准据法。我国法院在涉外仲裁协议法律适用方面应更好地执行《公约》的规定。     

《中华人民共和国反垄断法》析评

The Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China has provided to prohibit monopoly agreements and abuse of dominant market position, control concentration of business operators and fight against administrative monopoly. The transformation of China’s economic system is incomplete, and the Anti-Monopoly Law has many flaws. At the initial stage of enforcing the Anti-Monopoly Law, severe challenges will occur in legislative purposes, enforcement authorities, fighting against administrative monopoly and handling of the relationship between anti-monopoly enforcement and industry supervision. Thus, the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Law is only the first step in the legislation on anti-monopoly. Wang Xiaoye held a bachelor’s degree of philosophy from Inner Mongolian Normal University (1981), LL.M. from Renmin University of China (1984) and Doctor Juris magna cum laude from the University Hamburg (1993). Since 1984, she works at the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). From 1988 to 1993, she studied in Germany based on Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Private Law. As visiting scholar she spent a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Intellectual Property and Competition Law, and a year at Max-Planck Institute for Comparative Social Law in Munich. In 2004, she was invited to the US by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. In 2005, she was invited to the European Union Visitors Program, and awarded a Fulbright Scholarship to spend a year at the Chicago-Kent College of Law. Prof. Wang works in the areas of economic law, international economic law, and focuses on competition law. Her publications include: Monopoly and Competition in the Chinese Economy — A conception for merger control in China in view of the American and German practices (J C B Mohr, 1993); Monopoly Problem in the Merger of Enterprises (Law Press, 1996); On Competition Law (China’s Legal Publishing House, 1999); Competition Law of European Community (China’s Legal Publishing House, 2001); Economic Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2005); Competition Law (Social Sciences Academic Press, 2007). She also has over 200 papers published in Chinese, German and English languages. Prof. Wang has served as vice president of National Association for Economic Law of China, the head of the Consultant Committee for WTO Trade and Competition Policy of the Ministry of Commerce, and member of the Expert Advisory Board for Anti-Monopoly Legislation of the State Council and the National People’s Congress. In her honor, she once lectured on competition law for the Standing Committee of the Ninth and Tenth People’s Congress. In international academic activities, she is a founding member of Academic Society for Competition Law (ASCOLA) and of the Asian Competition Forum, and member of International Advisory Board of the CUTS C-CIER. She lectured on Chinese law at ABA, IBA, IPBA, ACF, Harvard University, Columbia University, Washington University (St. Louis), New York University, KFTC, Chatham House, LIDC, IDRC and other institutions.     

交易制度改革语境下协议转让功能及其构造

协议转让是以意思自治为本质之资本市场重要证券交易制度,其具有制度生成功能、完善公司治理功能、社会资源整合和配置优化功能、全球化和市场化背景下的经济品质提升和制度发展促进功能.由于我国证券法制的局限和国家政策因素影响,协议转让规则体系存在很大局限性,制度供给不足,违反了平等性要求,法律规定不足和市场机制缺陷交织.这都制约着协议转让功能的发挥.未来要以金融市场化为基础,贯彻利益平衡原则和效率原则,建立符合中国国情和国际法治要求的协议转让制度.     

纠纷解决过程的法社会学分析——读《纠纷的解决与审判制度》

以合意为正当性依据的准审判过程在现实运作中是一个决定性因素和合意性因素、状况性因素和规范性因素相互混合作用的过程;审判过程虽然是以中立性的决定方式解决纠纷,但是同样避免不了外部压力对其的影响和制约;准审判过程中的交涉性的合意机制能够为建构新的审判模式提供有益因素.     

Multi-Rater Agreement Using the Adapted Fracture Healing Scale (AFHS) for the Assessment of Tubular Bones on Conventional Radiographs: Preliminary Study*

Better understanding of the timing of fracture healing may help in cases of interpersonal violence but also of personal identification. The intra- and inter-rater agreement for the adapted fracture healing scale (AFHS) assessing the post-traumatic time interval on radiographs were tested. This is a preliminary study, providing essential information on method reliability for upcoming studies using the AFHS. Five raters (two radiologists, a forensic pathologist, an orthopedist, and an anthropologist) were presented with a test in three parts consisting of 85 radiographs (from 30 adults) of fractures of tubular bones in different stages of healing purposefully selected from more than 1500 radiographs. The raters were firstly asked to assess 15 features describing fracture healing as present, absent, or not assessable. Thereafter, the raters were asked to choose from the AFHS a single-stage best representing the observed healing pattern. The intra- and inter-rater agreement were assessed using single-rating, absolute agreement, two-way mixed-effects intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficients. The intra-rater ICC of radiologist 1 ranged from 0.80 to 0.94. The radiologists’ inter-rater ICC ranged from 0.68 to 0.74, while it ranged from −0.01 to 0.90 for the other raters. The good to excellent ICC among the radiologists and forensic anthropologist provides good foundation for the use of the AFHS in forensic cases of trauma dating. The poor to good results for the other physicians indicate that using the AFHS requires training in skeletal anatomy and radiology.     

遗赠扶养协议性质探析——我国继承法及其司法解释相关法条评析

从大多数遗赠扶养协议纠纷的判例来看,受扶养人的利益得到更多保护,其原因在于继承法侧重保护被继承人.但是,遗赠扶养协议之"协议性"也给合同法的适用提供可能,适用平等保护当事人的合同法会得出不同的结论.调和法律之间的冲突进而解决实践中的纠纷,需要以遗赠扶养协议的制度价值和社会需求为基础,明确遗赠扶养协议的合同属性,公平分配当事人之间的权利义务.     

德国在集体合同中或企业协议中有关解除雇佣关系保护的法律规定

德国劳动法对于雇员权利进行保护的核心内容,是要保护“劳动关系存续”。在解除雇佣关系时,德国在集体合同和企业协议中如何实行对雇员的劳动权利进行法律保护?这在德国的《解除雇佣关系保护法》以及《集体合同法》和《企业组织法》中作了相应规定,这些规定又几经修改,这对我国的劳动立法可以提供一些借鉴。     

国际间网络仲裁裁决的承认与执行

网络仲裁的产生和运用使得传统仲裁的局限性得到了解决,但随之产生了很多新的问题,本文主要探讨了在网络仲裁裁决的承认与执行这个关键环节上,如何确定网络仲裁裁决的有效性及其国籍,这个问题的解决直接关系到一个裁决能否得到被申请国的承认和执行;对于相应的问题,我国如何结合我国国情,借鉴国际上的先进做法完善现行法律,