Predicting the Use of Different Conflict Tactics Among Arab Siblings in Israel: A Study Based On Social Learning Theory

The article presents a study conducted among 832 Arab adolescents from Israel, in an attempt to predict their use of different tactics (i.e., reasoning, verbal abuse, and physical violence) to resolve conflicts with siblings from the perspective of social learning theory. Different forms of the CT Scales were utilized to elicit information on Arab adolescents' exposure to and experience with different conflict tactics in their families of origin, as well as on their use of such tactics with siblings. Results indicate that the more they witnessed reasoning in their families of origin, the greater the likelihood that they would use the same tactic to resolve conflicts with their siblings. At the same time, the more they witnessed or experienced verbal abuse and physical violence, the greater their use of verbal and physical violence against their siblings. A detailed discussion of different patterns of violence in Arab families as reported by the adolescents is presented, and several implications of the study are addressed.     

法律权利的演化和生长空间——控制论视角下权利冲突的结构功能

在控制论视角之下,权利冲突实质是对归属不明确的行为可能性空间支配权的争夺.经过以法院为中心的控制系统的调节,权利冲突可以在法制大系统中为权利的演化和生长提供空间.立法不协调或不明确所导致的权利冲突可以促进权利界分的演化;而权利空间再发现导致的权利冲突则使权利空间的实质增加或新权利的产生成为可能.     

《治安管理处罚法》与《刑法》的衔接与冲突

论文分析了我国《治安管理处罚法》与《刑法》的衔接与冲突的具体情形,特别强调了冲突的三种类型和具体条款,并从执法部门的角度提出了相应的解决策略。     

夫妻生育权冲突的法律救济

在婚姻关系中,夫妻双方的生育权处于对立统一的关系。夫妻双方均享有平等的生育权,夫妻生育权利的行使和实现有赖于夫妻双方的协力与配合,应当通过协商方式加以解决。其中,妻子一方享有生育的天然优势,完全有权实行意思自治。法律在保护女性生育权的同时,对男性生育权也应予以肯定和保护。当夫妻之间发生生育权冲突时,应由当事人协商或第三人调解解决;在双方无法达成合意的情况下,离婚便成为解决夫妻生育权冲突的合理途径。     

民事强制执行中生存权与债权的冲突与平衡

在法律规范的层面,民事强制执行程序存在着平衡生存权与债权关系的三层结构.这种正反合的制衡关系,既能够保障被执行人及其所扶养家属的基本生存权,同时又不对债权的实现构成不正当的妨害.但是,由于我国民事诉讼法在立法技术上存在缺陷,而司法解释又受到强势利益集团的影响,导致实践中对生存权与债权之间的关系在认识上有所偏差.为了改变这一状况,应当强化对生存权的保护,同时界定"生活所需的房屋"的范围,并建立相关的配套措施.     

试析高校青年人才隐性流动的群体冲突及其控制

随着市场经济的发展,高校中越来越多的青年教师和科研人员参与了本职工作以外的兼职工作,以满足自身物质需求和精神需求,这一问题的日益突出,成为高校管理工作的一大难题。本文就高校青年人才隐性流动带来的群体冲突及其成因进行分析,阐述了人才流动中产生的资源流动,分析这一流动的利与弊,提倡以“宜疏不宜堵”的态度和原则对之进行科学管理。     

对俄罗斯国际私法立法的评介及借鉴

前苏联解体后,俄罗斯根据对外民事交往的形势和需求,构建了新的国际私法体系。与前苏联相比,俄罗斯国际私法在立法形式上并没有重大突破,但在立法内容上,调整范围大为拓宽、意思自治原则应用的领域也更为广阔、最密切联系原则成为准据法确定的基本原则、诸多冲突规范均有实质性的改变。俄罗斯新的国际私法立法,对与其立法背景大体相同或相似的当前中国国际私法立法具有重要的借鉴意义。     

婚姻与生育的冲突初探

在我国传统中,生育子女是婚姻的目的,婚姻则为生育子女的手段,但是,随着社会和科技的发展,人们对婚姻价值的重新定位以及节育技术的逐渐完善,婚姻与生育的统一渐渐被打破,两者的冲突不可避免,而与之相适应的立法却略显滞后,有待进一步完善。     

Constitutional courts as arbiters of post-conflict territorial self-government: Bosnia and Macedonia

Constitutional and supreme courts frequently end up examining the political and legal questions at the heart of peace agreements and post-conflict constitutions. Where a peace agreement has included territorial self-government (TSG) provisions courts are often endowed with the capacity to adjudicate disputes between state and sub-state levels of government. The effectiveness of courts in fulfilling this role as not been comprehensively examined. This article fills this important gap examining whether the results of existing research on the role of constitutional and supreme courts in resolving disputes in traditional federalism also apply in these particular circumstances. It finds that where TSG is used as a conflict management mechanism judicial review can have centralizing tendencies if this occurs it can largely be attributed to the processes used to select though the devolutionary multinational nature of the states is also relevant.     

Framing Contests and Policy Conflicts over Gas Pipelines

This paper compares and contrasts high‐conflict policy debates over the siting of three natural gas pipeline projects at different decision stages of the siting process. This paper draws on over 600 newspaper articles spanning 3 years, analyzed through Discourse Network Analysis. Drawing from the Advocacy Coalition Framework and Policy Conflict framework, this paper finds that actor framing of opposing policy beliefs involves more indirect than direct confrontations, with statements in the media waxing and waning over time. Opponents of the pipelines more often explicitly argue against pipelines, while also using a broad range of conceptual arguments, whereas proponents more often couch their arguments around the economic benefits of pipelines and use fewer conceptual frames overall. We also find evidence that opposing coalitions use similar framing across different decision contexts. This paper concludes with a commentary on the status and contributions of this paper to the study of policy conflicts and next steps in advancing similar research agendas.