概括故意研究

概括故意是指行为人对于认识的具体内容并不明确，但明知自己的行为会发生危害社会的结果，而希望或者放任结果发生的心理态度。根据行为人认识的具体内容的不同，概括故意可以分为对行为认识不明确的概括故意、对行为对象认识不明确的概括故意以及对危害结果认识不明确的概括故意三种。对于概括故意的犯罪，应该考察行为人的客观行为及其结果，在概括故意的范围内按照主客观统一的原则予以认定。     

法律发展与法律知识化

法律发展首先必须面对合法化与价值诉求问题，而这一切又无不与作为基础的法律主体的知识立场密切相关。如何谋求“法律知识化”、话语合法化以及法律主体的价值立场的有效运作，是法律文明、有效发展的必要途径，也是法律发展话语摒弃规则主义弊端制约而建构自我所不可回避的挑战。从西方国家的经验看，现代法治的确立与以理性化为核心的法律知识化过程密不可分，法律知识化由知识对法律的关系提升、扩展为一种法律观，再由一种法律观落实为一种价值观、方法论，并由此引导法律主体追求和建设一种新的法律文明。更为重要的是，“法律知识化”使法治成为近代法律发展的本质性，把知识化原则导入法律发展领域，从而实现了法律发展的革命性变革。     

Between Interculturalism and Ethnocentrism: Local Government and the Indigenous Movement in Otavalo‐Ecuador

To what extent might an indigenous mayor govern beyond ethnically defined grievances, without being labelled traitor by the indigenous organisation? This article deals with the challenges faced by the Ecuadorian indigenous movement when it attains power in local government. The issue will be explored through the case of Mario Conejo, who in 2000 became the first indigenous mayor of Otavalo representing the indigenous political movement Pachakutik. Although ethnically based tensions in the local indigenous movement were evident throughout the period, 2006 saw Conejo leave Pachakutik and create a new political movement. This rupture can be traced, I argue, to an intercultural dilemma and the difficulties of ethnically defined political movements.     

Building informal knowledge‐sharing relationships between policy makers and academics: Insights from a PM&C engagement project

This article outlines an innovative project to encourage knowledge sharing and engagement between academics and a policy team within the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). The project was designed to enhance policy advice by drawing on a group of academics outside the policy ranks to act as a sounding board, to question, and provide differing perspectives within the policy process of crafting advice to government. External expertise and particularly academic research has the potential to improve evidence‐based policy but often fails to be specific or timely for those at the “pointy end” of policy decision making. An informal knowledge sharing framework has the potential to improve the exchange of information through confidential and targeted conversations between researchers and public servants as one way of overcoming these barriers.     

中西文明互鉴中的三种知识汇通模式

明末清初耶稣会士来华所引发的知识汇通,是中西文明互鉴的客观需求和重要表现。中西文化交流过程中形成了三种知识汇通模式:“中学为本”“西学为本”和“中西学并举”。它们分别以“西学东源”“中学西源”和“中西学异源”学说为理论依据,在不同历史时期都曾发挥了主流作用。在中西文化交流频繁的当下,如何将中西知识实现恰如其分的对接,仍是一个十分现实的问题。明末清初以来形成的三种中西知识汇通模式或可提供一些借鉴。     

论民族地区传统知识的积极性保护机制

民族地区传统知识丰富,随着民族文化产业的兴起,急需采取积极性保护机制。积极性保护机制,是指建立类似TRIPS的传统知识保护机制,授予传统知识所有者知识产权,如专利或其他类似权利,保护的核心是授予独占权,其目的是在现有制度资源条件下尽量实现传统知识的资源权益。民族地区传统知识的积极性保护机制主要包括:地方专门法制度、传统知识数据库权、补偿性责任制度等三个层面。     

企业全球竞争力的路径选择

在以日益复杂化以及变化迅速为特征的新经济时代，经济全球化的竞争正迫使越来越多的企业进入一个更不稳定、更难控制的世界中运作。在只有不确定性是可以确定的知识经济时代，企业全球竞争力的提升和持续竞争优势源于善用知识的力量执着于持续创新的事业。     

古希腊哲学中的灵魂问题初探

在古希腊哲学中,从泰勒斯、毕达哥拉斯到赫拉克利特、德谟克利特,再到柏拉图和亚里士多德,都对灵魂问题进行了阐释,分别赋予灵魂概念以物质、精神、运动、认识论和主体性的意义,并以灵魂问题为切入点,在人类认识史上开启了哲学基本问题的研究,从而使灵魂问题成为古希腊哲学中一个重要的基本问题.     

中国劳动法学发展回顾——以社会法学会10年年会（2003-2012）综述为样本

以社会法学10年年会综述为样本,分析中国社会转型最为剧烈的10年中劳动法学的发展状况及其走向,以年会主题为中心线索,在理清脉络的基础上得出年会论题的生成逻辑及劳动法学知识积累、理论创新的路径.另比较教科书的内容体系,发现劳动法学的研究和学科发展缺少劳动法学方法论的指导.基此,要完善劳动法学方法对知识创造、理论创新和学科建设的贡献,同时还方法论在社会法中以应有地位,以知识和方法共塑劳动法话语.     

Bounding the Commons: Land Demarcation in Northeastern Nicaragua

In north-eastern Nicaragua, territorial titling of communal lands conflates particular notions of ethnicity with proprietary conceptions of space to generate new forms of conflict within and between indigenous and black communities, and with mestizo migrants. Notions of rights between competing groups, or within conflicting normative frameworks, become increasingly polemic during demarcation. While analysis of three land titling case studies demonstrates that results are socially contingent and place based, trends include: (a) power disparities; (b) tension between 'traditional' and 'modern' patterns of land tenure and resource rights; and (c) contradictions fed by international conservation agendas and neoliberal economic reforms. Combining critical actor-based analysis with practical policy critique our work illuminates how contestations over the bounding of communal territories contribute to social injustice.