Bottom-up peacekeeping in southern Kyrgyzstan: how local actors managed to prevent the spread of violence from Osh/Jalal-Abad to Aravan,June 2010

In the aftermath of the June 2010 violence in southern Kyrgyzstan, much scholarly attention has focused on its causes. However, observers have taken little notice of the fact that while such urban areas as Osh, Jalal-Abad, and Bazar-Korgon were caught up in violence, some towns in southern Kyrgyzstan that were close to the conflict sites and had considerable conflict potential had managed to avoid the violence. Thus, while the question, “What were the causes of the June 2010 violence?” is important, we have few answers to the question, “Why did the conflict break out in some places but not others with similar conflict potential?” Located in the theoretical literature on “the local turn” within peacekeeping studies, this article is based on extensive empirical fieldwork to explore the local and micro-level dimensions of peacekeeping. It seeks to understand why and how local leaders and residents in some places in southern Kyrgyzstan managed to prevent the deadly clashes associated with Osh, Jalal-Abad, and Bazar-Korgon. The main focus of the project is on Aravan, a town with a mixed ethnic population where residents managed to avert interethnic clashes during the June 2010 unrest. The answers to the question of why violence did not occur can yield important lessons for conflict management not only for southern Kyrgyzstan, but also for the entire Central Asian region.     

The Consequences of Battleground and “Spectator” State Residency for Political Participation

This study uses pooled NES and state-level turnout data from 1988 through 2004 to assess whether a participation gap is emerging in the United States between the residents of battleground and non-battleground states in presidential elections. The analysis finds that Electoral College (EC) participatory disparities are more likely to occur in voting and meeting attendance than in donating and political discussion. Moreover, it suggests that such disparities are more likely to occur when presidential elections are nationally competitive. The study also demonstrates that when participatory gaps do occur they are the result of a surge in participation among battleground state residents—not of citizen withdrawal in safe states, as many EC critics contend. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

“非虚构写作”在网络舆情事件中的情感动员功能与表达逻辑

社交媒体时代,舆论生态的“后真相时代”特征日益鲜明,情感与信念成为网络舆情事件的主要动力。“非虚构写作”作为将纪实报道与文学创作结合起来的写作手法,在网络舆情事件中发挥着强大的情感动员功能。通过将悲情叙事、身份标签、戏谑表达等传统的网络情感动员表达逻辑与“文史合一”、忧患意识等“非虚构写作”本土概念巧妙嫁接,“非虚构写作”引发了一系列重大网络舆情事件,呈现出社会学观察、原型叙事、文化冲突三种表达逻辑。“非虚构写作”在舆情表达、舆论监督、社会观察等方面发挥着积极作用。同时,带有深刻情感色彩的“非虚构写作”也蕴含着网络民粹主义、网络暴力、网络虚假信息等诸多风险因素。如何实现“非虚构写作”批判与建设、解构与建构、破与立等方面的平衡,这为互联网生态建设提出了新的内容和新的问题。     

Apartisans and the changing German electorate

The concept of party identification is central to our understanding of electoral behavior. This paper builds upon the functional logic of party identification and asks what occurs when more Germans manage the complexities of politics without needing to rely on habitual party cues—what we label as Apartisans. We track the distribution of party mobilization and cognitive mobilization within the German electorate from 1976 until 2009. Then, we demonstrate the importance of these mobilization patterns by documenting strong differences in electoral commitment, the content of political thinking, and electoral change. The results suggest a secular transformation in the characteristics of the public has led to a more differentiated and dealigned German electorate.     

国家和社会共同在场:公共卫生事件下社会动员机制研究

社会动员是一种通过利益机制或政策引导调动人们的参与积极性,从而调动社会资源和整合社会力量,进而实现特定目标的工作方法[1].在2003年抗击非典型肺炎疫情中,我国的社会动员发挥了强大力量,但是以行政命令为主要推动力发挥优势的同时,也导致了一定程度的社会秩序混乱以及管理机制失调.随着社会全方位的变化发展,2019年底至今...     

在统筹推进疫情防控和经济发展中展现“中国之治”的强大社会动员力

社会动员是因特定需要整合社会各方面资源要素以实现特定目标的集体行动过程。在抗击新冠肺炎疫情的斗争中,党的领导坚强有力、舆论宣传凝聚民心、基层基础坚实稳固、社会力量勠力同心,充分展现了全民战"疫"的中国规模、中国速度、中国力量,集中检视了"中国之治"的强大社会动员力。统筹推进疫情防控和经济社会发展,必须持续增强社会动员能力,加强动员主体建设,分类实施精准动员,合理运用动员方式,更好地凝聚全国人民众志成城、共克时艰的强大合力。     

关节松动结合醋热疗法治疗肩周炎80例

目的观察关节松动结合醋热疗法治疗肩周炎的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析160例肩周炎患者的临床资料,按性别、年龄、病程、治法相匹配的原则将其分为治疗组和对照组各80例。治疗组患者接受关节松动和醋热疗法,对照组患者接受关节松动和特定电滋波治疗仪理疗,10d为1个疗程,治疗1~3个疗程。采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价肩关节疼痛程度,采用美国Michaelfeese量表评价肩关节功能。结果与治疗前比较,治疗后两组VAS评分均显著降低(P0.05),肩关节功能评分均显著升高(P0.05);治疗组治疗后VAS评分下降值和肩关节功能评分升高值均显著大于对照组(P0.05)。两组临床疗效分布比较,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论关节松动结合醋热疗法可明显减轻肩周炎患者的疼痛症状,改善肩关节功能。     

社会动员的适度性问题探析

在一个国家中,适度的社会动员能充分调动起社会大众投身于社会各项建设事业的积极性、主动性与创造性。动员过度会影响到经济的持续发展和社会的稳定,其影响因素主要表现为工业化与城市化进程、经济增长、大众传媒的扩展、人为推动及社会流动等。社会动员不足同样不利于社会的发展,会使一个国家失去良好的发展机遇,甚至会导致发展失败。在实践中把握好社会动员的适度性是十分重要的。     

宗教运动与社会动员:木嘎拉祜族神话、历史记忆与族群身份认同

清中期以来,汉族移民不断进入云南中南部澜沧江两岸山区,在清政府推行的“改土归流”压力下,拉祜族以“佛教”为旗号的宗教运动,将整个社会的政治经济秩序和文化意义进行重构,逐渐形成了一个地方生活中的诠释框架,通过神话及仪式,使自己的族群身份认同及历史传统对现实的影响,在群体的历史记忆中表达出来。     

我国党风廉政建设中公众参与的政治动员模式：回顾与反思

动员公众参与党风廉政建设是我国在特定的历史条件下为获得公众对这一议题的认同和支持．引导公众积极参与而采取的一种模式。客观分析这种模式形成的背景，深入剖析这种模式的特征。认真总结其经验和教训。对当下如何引导公众参与党风廉政建设，完善公众参与制度，加强政府与公众在党风廉政建设中的互动与合作仍具有重要的意义。