论刑法解释中的利益相关性

刑法解释过程中始终存在着利益的影响。刑法解释主体,解释案的请求者,解释对象所代表的不同利益,解释结论具有不同的烙印。刑法解释中不同主体的利益取向不可避免地会出现机构之间的冲突,出现人权保障和法益维护等刑法不同机能的冲突。因而必须确保不同机能的平衡,促进刑法解释过程中的参与民主性。     

法律论证与裁判智慧

法律论证有效性需要依循特定语境,这决定了许多司法裁判实例中都体现出来某种直觉性反思。那么在面对普遍性原则与规范的对应时,发现例外情形表现为一种常态。例外指向的是一种关于规则与论证的可批判性与可反思性,应当给予法律人甚至当事人更多的创造力展现、创新性思维甚至直觉性反思的空间。正如关联原则要求的那样,裁判智慧的关键不仅在于裁决结论依循的原则的普遍性与抽象层次,还在于界分与借助不同原则与理念之间的关系。据此也应该确保规则对多种可能性的容纳。     

网络文化与青少年犯罪的相关性研究

网络文化对青少年的成长有着深刻的影响。网络文化特有的开放性、虚拟性、及时性和综合性等特点,给青少年的思想观念带来了相当大的冲击,造成很大的负面影响,为青少年犯罪心理的形成和发展提供了文化背景,一定程度上导致了青少年犯罪。为此,必须高度重视各种消极影响,积极采取对策,使负面影响降到尽可能低的程度,惟此才能使青少年在网络文化环境中健康成长。     

论权利与义务的相关性

权利与义务的相关性问题一直是我国法学界所忽略的问题。权利除有道德的与法律的之分外 ,还可分为社会权利、一般权利、绝对权利与相对权利等种类与形态 ,而与之相对应的义务也是多种多样的。另外 ,从权利自身的内部结构分析 ,除可分为三项权利之外 ,权利自身还包含特定的义务     

论行政法上禁止不当结合原则

禁止不当结合原则是指行政机关追求行政目的与其所采的手段间,必须有合理的联结关系。若欠缺此联结关系,该项行政行为即非合法。该原则为行政法上一般法律原则,必须具备合目的性、关联性、可接受性三大要素。本文旨在检讨实定法上不当结合之缺失,探求禁止不当结合原则的法理基础、法律要素及适用领域。     

"关联理论"视角下的翻译质量评估

关联理论的焦点是认知与交际,认为翻译是一种依据不同的文本语境追求译文最大趋同度的动态推理过程,并以此追求译文的灵活调变和辩证取舍,以及译语语篇与源语语篇之间、交际与意义之间最大程度的趋同。关联理论强调原交际者的目的和受体的期待在认知环境相关的方面与原文相似。关联理论是译文质量评价的理论根据,因为译文的最大关联就是追求译文优劣的趋同原则。     

Political Science Perspectives on Human Rights

This special issue of Human Rights Review is devoted to an exploration of the current human rights research agendas within the political science discipline. Research on human rights is truly an interdisciplinary quest in which various epistemologies can contribute to each other and form a larger dialogue concerning rights and wrongs. This special issue is devoted to an expansive understanding of the state of research on human rights in the political science discipline. One common theme throughout these contributions is the need for a more nuanced conceptualization of human rights, tools to promote these rights and as social scientists, methodologies employed to study these rights. A second theme is the policy relevance that can be derived from our empirical analysis. This volume demonstrates that the integration of theoretically and normatively rich concepts, empirical social science, and policy relevance do not have to be mutually exclusive when studying human rights.     

A New Era for Think Tanks in Public Policy? International Trends,Australian Realities

Although the powerful have always sought advice from the knowledgeable, it took the appeal of the policy sciences movement of the late 1940s and onward to build and consolidate a veritable industry of policy analysis and advice. ¹ One of the hallmarks of this development was the advent of institutes that were exclusively devoted to produce research‐based policy arguments and to inject these into the policy‐making process. These organisations were referred to as ‘think tanks’. Half a century later, the project of the policy sciences movement has been amply criticised, and has mutated into various philosophies of policy analysis, each harbouring distinct and often conflicting perspectives on the nature and role of (scientific) knowledge in the battle of arguments that is public policy‐making. The first wave of the policy sciences movement's privileging of science‐based policy has not disappeared. In fact it is currently experiencing a revival under the banner of ‘evidence‐based policy’. But it has to compete with other views of public policy‐making which deconstruct the authority claim of scientific knowledge, emphasising instead its contestability. Yet there are now more organisations that refer to themselves, or can be labelled, as ‘think tanks’ than ever before. Why? And what does it mean to be a ‘think tank’ in the post‐positivist era and in the increasingly boundary‐less, highly networked societies of today? This article first surveys recent developments in the world of think tanks as reported by the international literature on the subject, and then examines the implications for understanding the nature and role of Australian think tanks.     

失业保险何以覆盖非正规就业者 ：现状、困境与对策

在“就业优先”战略背景下,非正规就业者的失业保险权益缺损问题愈发凸显。从现有的法律 规范看,要将失业保险覆盖至非正规就业者,还存在社会性不足对失业保险制度适用范围的限制、多重劳动用 工关系下传统失业保险制度的规制阙如、保费负担与失业保险待遇给付资格和非正规就业者就业特点的错位等 方面的问题。研究建议：根据社会连带理论,失业保险制度应突破劳动关系束缚,发挥其社会性;失业保险适 用范围还应遵循保障需求性原则,分层纳入非正规就业者。在多重劳动用工关系中,非正规就业者不应重复参保, 但每一个用人单位都有为其缴纳失业保险费的义务,失业保险待遇也应基于全部缴费而定。对于保费负担与待 遇给付资格,则应符合非正规就业者的就业特点。     

马克斯·韦伯法律社会学中的方法论问题

作为其全部社会理论的一个组成部分,马克斯·韦伯的法律社会学是建立在一套较为系统的社会科学方法论基础之上的。正是根据这一方法论以及具体的理想类型方法,韦伯提出了法秩序的社会学概念,对法律制度进行了类型学分析,并对法律制度进行了比较研究。从根本上说,韦伯是站在外部观察者的立场上对法律制度进行探究的,但是他始终无法从根本上摆脱他所反对的价值判断。