伯克—萨维尼意义上的“历史主义”法学思想

伯克—萨维尼强调社会生活有机结构的重要性及它们部分的是＂非意图形成＂,特别是关于法起源于民族＂共同意识＂的理论,对德国和欧美的法学界影响深远。辨识伯克—萨维尼＂有机体＂说以及＂历史主义＂研究法学的思路和方法,讨论历史法学与古典自然法学的尖锐对立,有助于理解历史法学派的思想内核——大量社会现象有机地、非意图形成的理论,对立法活动的可能影响。即使利弊共存,与那些关注如何抵制经济领域创新狂热的经济学家一样,法学家尤其应当关注如何抵制立法领域的创新狂热。     

On the Viability of the Concept of Staatswissenschaften

Staatswissenschaften is said to mean that there are certain specific fields of scholarly inquiry and higher education that relate primarily to the state, which is defined widely as structured human living-together. It is outlined why this is a concept viable for the future, particularly—but not only—in and for Europe.     

我国公有公共设施致害赔偿问题研究——以行政公产为视角

公有公共设施是行政公产的重要组成部分，在大陆法系国家一般由国家赔偿法对其致害的情况进行调整。我国并未将公有公共设施致害纳入国家赔偿的范围，只是将其中一部分作为民事侵权案件来处理，这样做致使大部分公有公共设施致害赔偿案件无法可依，也不符合对受害人权益的保护和我国公共行政的发展。考虑到公有公共设施的行政公产属性，需要将公有公共设施的致害纳入国家赔偿法范围。     

选举权的性质解析

Suffrage is not a right “recognized” by the Constitution but “created” by people through the Constitution, which is a right of the closest relationship with the people’s sovereignty. It is both a right and a power, where the attribute of right is manifested in that it can be waived with the nature of interest and will, and the attribute of power is manifested in that it can determine the interest and destiny of candidates. However, no attribute is complete. Suffrage is an individual right rather than a collective right, with indirect relationship with the state power but direct relationship with the “holders” of state power, creating them and in turn influencing the state power.     

关于法定优先购买权的几个问题

本文对优先购买权的基本问题进行了分析和论证。首先区分了优先购买权行使的常态和异态,以此对优先购买权的涵义进行了界定;其次将优先购买权定性为形成权,进而指出经过公示的优先购买权具有排斥后来的与该项权利内容相同的权利变动的效力;最后对出卖人与第三人订立的买卖合同的效力进行了评判。     

言内语境影响下的《毛传》直训训释词分析

《毛传》直训是随文释义的训释材料,因此在语境影响下,《毛传》直训体现为多种训释类型。其中言内语境激活同义单位之间的区别义素,《毛传》从语法属性、语义搭配等角度对同义聚合体进行辨异选择,结果便形成《毛传》直训训释词的多重设置这一现象。     

Regionalising the state: political topography of regulatory regionalism

In recent years new modes of regional governance such as peer review, policy networks, and multi-level governance, have emerged not only in the European Union but in other regions such as the Asia Pacific. This article explains the rise of these new modes of governance in terms of the framework of regulatory regionalism. It suggests that these new modes of governance constitute distinctive forms of regionalised governance within the state. Hence emerging practices of regional governance are not above the national state, but instantiated within it. Just as much as the national territorial state was consolidated over the nineteenth and much of the twentieth century, the twenty-first century is likely to see the consolidation of new forms and practices of regional governance in which the ‘regional’ becomes incorporated within the political space of the state.     

事态犯罪的共犯理论研究

关于事态犯罪的研究已经形成若干成果。但关于其共犯形态的专门性研究尚属少见,为了实现司法实践中对事态犯罪具体案件的正确认定,本文着力探讨了事态犯罪共犯的相关理论,重点论述了事态犯罪的间接正犯、身份犯问题,事态犯罪的共同故意和犯罪目的问题,以及共犯行为方式的不同结合等几个问题。     

无罪推定与刑事诉讼中的"国家权力哲学"

贝卡里亚在社会契约论基础上第一次提出了无罪推定原则,其主旨在于反对封建刑事诉讼制度中对被告人的刑讯———这一合法暴行。随着人类社会民主、法治进程的发展,无罪推定的内涵在不断拓展。无罪推定原则为我们提供了研究刑事诉讼制度的宝贵路径,即应如何把握刑事诉讼中国家权力与公民权利的结构性关系。现代刑事诉讼中国家权力应遵循的“哲学”是:国家权力的谦抑性、以权力制约权力、以权利制约权力及国家机关对权利主体的诉讼关照。无罪推定的宪法化与国际化趋势,进一步说明了这一原则在现代刑事诉讼中不可动摇的核心地位。     

人民法院对收养行为的审查权探析

收养必须符合收养成立的实质要件,并同时履行收养法定程序,才能产生法律效力。我国收养法规定收养以向县级以上人民政府民政部门办理登记为形式要件,没有规定人民法院对收养行为的审查权,这与我国港、澳、台地区收养制度存在冲突,与世界主要发达国家对收养的国家监督主义色彩日渐浓厚的趋势不相吻合。立法上有必要明确赋予人民法院对收养行为的审查权,取消收养登记机关宣告收养无效的权力。