高校体育教师素质对大学生参与体育活动的影响

文章采用文献资料法、问卷调查法、数理统计法等对高校体育教师素质对大学生参与体育活动的影响进行分析总结,得出:高校体育教师的专业知识、专业能力、态度和价值观等素质对大学生参与体育活动的积极性有很大的影响,必须加强高校体育教师素质培养,提升高校体育教师各方面的能力,从而促进大学生参与体育活动的积极性。     

《民法典》诚实信用原则对不当商标申请行为的规制

诚实信用原则是民法的基本原则,同样贯穿于商标申请、使用等行为的各个方面,民事主体无论是申请注册商标还是商标使用都需严格遵守诚实信用原则。国家知识产权局商标局以《商标法》第10条第1款第8项的"其他不良影响"对系列"火神山""雷神山""李文亮"商标的注册申请进行"管控"。但"不良影响"具有严格的适用条件,而非商标申请行为可能会产生消极、负面影响。运用"不良影响"对不当商标申请行为进行管控不符合商标法的立法本意,以违反了诚实信用原则进行规制更加合适。     

论社会宪政

社会宪政既不同于传统的国家宪政,也不同于所谓的＂新宪政＂论,它是以规范和调控社会公权力为核心的宪政形式。国家公共领域和社会公共领域并存的公共领域二元化结构是社会宪政的社会学基础,社会公权力和人性尊严的密切相关是社会宪政的价值论基础,人性的善恶双重性是社会宪政的人性论基础,国家宪政对社会宪政的兼容性是社会宪政的政治学基础。在价值层面,社会宪政遵循民主、法治、人权的基本理念;在制度层面,社会宪政主要由社会民主制度、社会公权力制约制度和社会公权力保障人权制度构成。在全球＂社团革命＂浪潮冲击下,社会宪政是我国宪政建设的重要组成部分。     

刑事案件中陪审员对科学证据的期望-“CSI效应”神话的观念与现实

美国密歇根州沃什特瑙县抽样调查显示，陪审员对于提供给他们的科学证据抱有很高的期望；在所有强奸案件和依据间接证据定案的案件中，如果把科学证据作为被告人有罪的一个条件，陪审员对这种科学证据的要求很高；观看《犯罪现场调查》的陪审员与没有观看该电视剧的陪审员在这方面没有任何差别。韦恩县的研究结果表明，陪审员对于他们使用的技术越精通，他们对于控方在其案件中使用科学证据的期望就越高。在这两个地方的研究表明，陪审员对科学证据的期望和要求是大众文化广泛变革的结果，是大众媒体和诉讼参与人相信这种效应存在而培养起来的。     

能动司法问题研究

我国的"能动司法"具有服务性、主动性、高效性的特点,与英美法系和大陆法系的"司法能动主义"涵义不同。在我国,"能动司法"与政治是不可分割的,但司法不能"政治化"。"能动司法"与"司法克制"是辩证统一的关系,是司法运作过程中的两个方面,共存于司法活动当中。在能动司法的过程中,要坚持法律效果与社会效果的统一。     

论青年志愿行为的社会引领效应

志愿服务是青年现代社会参与的有效方式,青年参与志愿服务不仅满足自身成长和发展的内在需求,而且能够有效地作用于全社会。青年通过志愿行动产生社会行为引领效应;青年倡导志愿精神产生社会价值引领效应;青年传播志愿文化产生社会风尚引领效应。青年在参与志愿服务中产生的“奉献、友爱、互助、进步”精神正成为全社会的普遍诉求,引领和推动着我国志愿服务事业的发展。     

The legal effect of EU Regulations

The EU institutions are increasingly addressing harmonisation by means of regulation rather than the traditional use of directives. This is particularly impacting areas such as data protection, financial services regulation and European standardisation in Information and Communications Technology. More broadly, using directly applicable regulations which may have horizontal and vertical direct effect rather than directives has important administrative and constitutional implications for their application in national law and impacts on Member States' discretion to implement supplementary legislation which falls within the remit of the regulation in question. This is of particular concern where governments implement policies which might be in contravention of these rules. This may be the case in relation to the UK government's public procurement policy which mandates royalty free standards rather than royalty bearing standards with the option for the licence holder to licence royalty free.     

我国大型资源型企业经济转型的发展效果评价——基于平煤神马集团的实证研究

对大型资源型企业经济转型发展的效果进行评价,对于发展循环经济,促进矿区实现可持续发展至关重要。在对几种典型的评价方法进行比较和改进的基础上,根据典型案例的具体情况,运用适应于对大型资源型企业经济转型发展进行综合评价的方法评价了其经济转型发展的效果,以期为同类企业经济转型发展的效果进行科学评价提供一个范例与思路的同时,也能为政府对大型资源型企业的经济转型发展进行科学考核提供可靠的依据以及为企业找出经济转型发展过程中存在的不足与偏失、改进今后的工作提供有益的参考。     

Are individuals' familiarity judgments diagnostic of prior contact?

The extensive eyewitness memory research literature has been restricted to memory for strangers. Although it is often assumed that eyewitnesses are more accurate identifying familiar than unfamiliar individuals, little is known about whether individuals' familiarity judgments are diagnostic of prior contact. Caucasian and Asian sophomores (N=139) in two small private high schools viewed yearbook pictures of (a) graduated students from their school who were seniors (fourth year) when participants were freshmen (first year) (familiar) and (b) unfamiliar individuals, and responded whether each was ‘familiar’. The design was completely crossed; familiar faces at each school served as unfamiliar faces at the other school. Based on d′ data, the cross-race effect resulted for familiarity judgments. Also, although individuals' familiarity judgments were diagnostic of prior contact, accuracy was low (mean hit rate=0.42; mean false alarm rate=0.23), rendering an eyewitness's report of having seen a perpetrator casually in the past of limited forensic value.     

Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection

Abstract

The impact of interview styles on lie detection was examined. Thirty-six truth tellers and liars (undergraduates) were interviewed in three different ways: The interview started with an information-gathering interview style (Phase 1), which then developed into an interrogation (Phase 2), and finally transformed back into an information-gathering interview style (Phase 3). On the basis of DePaulo and Kirkendol's Motivational Impairment Effect, which suggests that when people are highly motivated to get away with their lies they actually look like they are controlling their behavior, it was hypothesized that the most prominent differences between liars and truth tellers would emerge in Phase 3. The findings supported this hypothesis, and thus suggest that specific interview styles could facilitate lie detection.