性骚扰行为探讨

性骚扰是指向他人发出不受欢迎的性信息。性骚扰行为会损害受害人身体、精神健康 ,导致受害人情绪消极 ,降低受害人交际能力 ,影响受害人婚姻关系 ,造成受害人经济损失 ,影响受害人职业发展。性骚扰受害人应认识性骚扰者的心理状态 ,冷静处理性骚扰行为 ,向性骚扰者明确态度 ,并且积极寻求帮助 ,以规避性骚扰行为的侵害。     

Family Structure and Problem Behavior of Adolescents and Young Adults: A Growth-Curve Study

In the present longitudinal 3-wave study of 1274 adolescents and young adults, aged 12–24 at the 1st wave, it is examined whether youngsters from intact versus postdivorce families show long-term differences in internalizing and externalizing problems. Furthermore, possible differences in the development of this problem behavior between offspring from intact and postdivorce families are examined, i.e., possible differences in growth curves of internalizing and externalizing problems are investigated. Longitudinal multilevel analyses reveal long-term differences in internalizing and externalizing problems according to family structure. Adolescents and young adults growing up in postdivorce families display more internalizing and externalizing problem behavior than youngsters of intact families. The development of these 2 types of problem behavior does not differ by gender or family structure. That is, the shape of the growth curves of internalizing and externalizing problem behavior is similar for boys and girls and also for youngsters from intact and postdivorce families. Inge VanderValk is a Postdoc Researcher at the Department of Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. She received her Ph.D. in 2004 from Utrecht University. Her major research interests include associations between adolescent adjustment and parental marital quality and parental divorce. Ed Spruijt is an Associate Professor at the University of Utrecht. He received his Ph.D. in 1983 from Utrecht University. His major research interests are the consequences of parental divorce and visitation arrangements on children. Martijn de Goede is an associate Professor at Utrecht University, Department of Methodology and Statistics. He received his Ph.D. in 1988 from Utrecht University. His major research interests are occupational and relational life courses of youngsters. Cora Maas is an Assistent Professor at Utrecht University, Department of Methodology and Statistics. She received her PH.D. in 1992 in Utrecht from Utrecht University. Her major interests are: multilevel analysis (theory and applications). Wim Meeus is full Professor of Adolescent Development at Utrecht University. He received his Ph.D. in 1984 from Utrecht University. His major research interests are personality, identity, and relationships in adolescence.     

关于性骚扰立法的几点思考--兼评《妇女权益保障法》相关条款

本文就中国性骚扰立法提出浅见。首先须准确界定性骚扰的概念,将公众场所性骚扰、女性对男性性骚扰、同性间性骚扰和非受雇性骚扰纳入性骚扰范畴;其次坚持以反性别歧视法为主的立法路径,明确雇主责任;最后应综合运用公法和私法手段,形成反性骚扰的法律体系。     

改革开放以来中国共产党对性别和谐的探索

新中国成立以来,特别是改革开放以来党和国家面对社会中性别矛盾突出的问题,加快了对性别和谐政策的制定和贯彻,也取得了巨大成就:将男女平等确立为基本国策,制定了两个《中国妇女发展纲要》,将妇女发展纳入到国家行动规划,将性别意识纳入决策主流。在此过程中总结出宝贵的经验:坚持马克思主义的指导地位,不断与时俱进,通过坚持政府地位,加强和完善法律条文,建设先进性文化,发挥传媒积极作用等,逐步探索出一条适合中国国情的性别和谐之路。     

报复社会型行为的模仿机理及其阻断

不断发生的报复社会事件对我国社会稳定形成了严重的挑战,其后大量模仿事件的发生说明我国社会结构和控制能力出现了问题。通过对大量报复社会型行为研究发现,导致此类模仿事件大量产生有两方面原因,一是行为人个体的心理障碍;二是外部环境原因,包括表达诉求机制的缺失、媒体的不当传播、行为实施成本低廉、社会认同心理的出现等。阻断反社会行为的模仿,需要建立良好的社会利益分配和社会保障机制,加强对重点人群的管控工作,积极协调改善媒体的传播效应,同时要保护好"易感人群",加强被害预防工作。     

强奸罪的文化学分析

强奸罪作为人类文明史上一个古老的犯罪命题 ,其立法模式是文化所认可的各种态度与价值的缩影。传统的强奸罪立法模式深植于男权制社会之中。 2 0世纪中后期以来 ,域外出现的强奸罪立法新模式反映了人们性观念及价值观的改变 ,是理想主义的结晶。基于现实国情 ,我国在强奸罪立法模式上可走一条现实向理想逐步过渡的渐进路线 :在坚持现行刑法典规定的前提下 ,对特殊个案按强奸罪新模式作出处理 ,以个案判决逐步影响民众的观念 ,最终实观立法的转变。     

增强全社会的社会性别意识，为妇女发展创造良好的社会环境

文章通过对现实生活中性别公正问题的分析,指出社会的性别偏见甚至性别歧视仍然存在,且极有市场.建议要营造良好的政策环境、教育环境和舆论环境,建立一个不仅是法律上男女平等,而且是事实上男女平等的社会,为妇女发展创造良好的社会环境.     

对提高政府行政行为的正价值途径的思考

政府行为是依法行使的一种国家行政权力行为,涉及到广大人民群众的根本利益,需要严格地按照规范的工作程序进行,特别是政府的重大行为、原则行为必须按照一定的程序进行,尤其是要按照法律规定的权限行事,在国家法律许可和保障的条件下运行,这样才能确保政府行为实现调控社会的管理职能。     

论性骚扰的损害赔偿

文章通过对中国性骚扰案件的评析,在借鉴国外经验基础上提出应该完善中国性骚扰损害赔偿制度:除了精神损害赔偿,还应该增加工资和预期利益等补偿,并且将惩罚性赔偿制度纳入职场性骚扰的损害赔偿中,给与受害人充分、合理的保护。     

婚内强制性性行为的文化解析及评价

对在婚姻存续期间发生的强制性性行为的评价,无论是学界还是实务界都存在诸多的争议。既有犯罪化与非犯罪化的思辨,也有截然相反的判例。而近乎通说的“婚内强奸”的称谓本身就是以承认该种强制性性行为犯罪化为前提,这种有罪推定的假定既不符合刑法的谦抑和罪刑法定原则,也使得对婚内强制性性行为的其他评价毫无意义。从客观主义立场出发,以文化的视角对该行为进行解析,进而对其进行道德、违法或犯罪评价,但排除强奸化的评价。