略论江泽民的“三农“思想

中国的国情决定了"三农"问题是中国社会主义现代化建设和今后发展的根本性问题.江泽民同志始终十分重视"三农"问题,他的关于解决"三农"问题的思想是我们党制定新时期"三农"政策的理论基础,对建设中国特色社会主义事业具有重要的指导意义.     

开展中俄农业合作，构建外向型优势农业

黑龙江省与俄罗斯远东地区有3040公里的边境线,发展外向型优势农业前景广阔。东宁县正按照"科学规划、合理布局、迅速启动、分步实施"的原则,努力构建"黑龙江省东南部—北部沿边地区外向型优势农业发展带",形成纵贯中俄边境、产业密集度高、利益联结紧密的特定农业示范区域。     

西部地区农业产业结构调整的战略对策

紧紧抓住西部大开发的历史机遇 ,运用科技进步 ,推动农业产业结构调整 ,大力发展林果业、草产业、精准农业、生物工程、舍饲畜牧业、绿色农业、观光农业、特色农业、订单农业、加工农业等十大农业 ,是西部地区农业实现两个转变 ,向现代农业发展的战略性选择。     

德宏州农业产业化发展问题研究

德宏州具备实施农业产业化的有利条件.推进农业产业化经营,既是德宏州工业化和现代化的必然趋势,也是德宏州实现全面建设小康社会的重要条件.     

对新世纪农业产业化经营的再探析

农业产业化经营是市场农业的基本经营方式。面对我国加入WTO和全面建设小康社会的新阶段 ,农业产业化经营面临诸多如 :制度创新问题、体制问题、土地制度问题、市场问题、投资问题等 ,为此 ,深化农业产业化经营的对策选择是 :农业产业化经营要以市场为龙头 ,充分发挥企业家的骨干作用 ,逐步形成以市场为导向的利益机制 ,转变政府职能 ,改革管理机制和体制     

邓小平农业发展理论新探

邓小平同志一贯重视中国的农业问题,他对我国20多年来农村经济改革的经验进行了科学总结和理论概括,形成了完整的农业发展理论。     

农业规模经营模式选择

实现农业规模经营是农业结构调整的一项重要内容。农业规模经营存在诸多约束条件,要选择符合本地区的农业规模经营模式。     

Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro‐environmental policy

This study of municipal enforcement of agro‐environmental regulations in Denmark provides an empirical understanding of how enforcement affects compliance. A key contribution is sorting out the relative influence of inspectors' different styles of enforcement and choices made by enforcement agencies. The latter are shown to be more important in bringing about compliance than are inspectors' enforcement styles. Municipal agencies are shown to increase compliance through the use of third parties, more frequent inspection, and setting priorities for inspection of major items. The findings about enforcement styles of inspectors suggest it is necessary to get tough up to a point, but beyond that the threat of coercion can be counterproductive. These findings cast doubt on the effectiveness of overly legalistic enforcement styles, particularly for the Danish culture with its strong emphasis on cooperation and consultation in regulation. But the findings also advise us to be cautious about the use of cooperative styles of enforcement in that we find evidence for capture of the enforcement process by agricultural organizations. This leads to a more nuanced view of enforcement rather than the broad generalizations found in the literature concerning legalism and cooperation. © 1999 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. <@:>     

Situating tenure,capital and finance in farmland relations: implications for stewardship and agroecological health in Ontario,Canada

Farmers in Canada are older and more capitalized than ever before. Meanwhile, farmland values continue to rise. These forces together are generating unprecedented shifts in farmland relations, marked by increasing reliance on rental tenure and the rise of hybrid owner–renter consolidating farmers. This paper explores these dynamics in Ontario and asks how they are impacting on-farm agroecological stewardship. To do so, we begin with a review of the land and property relations literature as well as farmland and agricultural change in Ontario. We then briefly review agroecological issues and concepts that are important for linking on-farm agroecological health to aformentioned farmland and agricultural changes. From here, we use survey, interview and soil sample data collected from grain farmers across Ontario to elucidate relatively new shifts in land tenure and use dynamics. We argue that this complex set of forces is interacting to produce an appealing set of conditions for financial investors, while restricting access to farmland for less-capitalized farmers. We then show how these shifts are divesting capital and attention from agroecological health. We conclude with a reflection on how the state has been mediating and contributing to these dynamics, and urgently call for land policy that prioritizes social and ecological principals.     

The global political economy of climate change,agriculture and food systems

The food and agriculture sector is both a major contributor to climate change and especially vulnerable to its worst impacts. This means that much is at stake in what is a complex set of contested political dynamics as new governance agendas are rolled out. On one hand, there is a strong push for ‘climate-smart agriculture’ (CSA) and related initiatives in the area of marine resources such as the idea of the blue economy, as an attempt to bring a range of viewpoints together to address the interrelationship between these ecological and economic systems. On the other hand, critics see these strategies as promotion of more of the same kinds of policies that created stress in the climate–food system in the first place. To unpack these issues, this special forum brings together a collection of papers that highlight three overlapping themes that lie at the centre of these debates, yet which have not been fully acknowledged by those implementing CSA initiatives: the role of power and interests in shaping governance approaches to climate and food systems; the ways in which existing approaches, primarily those promoting open markets and technology, are reinforced in governance initiatives; and the sidelining of questions of inequality.