西部大开发中的生态环境可持续发展问题

本文以研究西部大开发中的生态环境可持续发展为中心,采用实证研究,进一步阐述了如何处理二者之间的关系。通过对生态环境状况恶化及其症结的论述,指出了以生态建设为中心的可持续发展战略在西部大开发中的重要性,并提出了如何实现可持续发展的具体设想。 严重的水土流失、土地荒漠化加剧、水资源短缺、植被破坏、森林草原退化是西部地区面临的主要生态环境问题,工业污染成为城市发展经济的后遗症。这一切问题都有其症结所在:历史上长期的生产力水平低下与生态脆弱互为因果;“过分强调粮食自给”的发展模式导致森林破坏和水土流失;经济建设不遵循生态环境规律,生态建设科技支撑能力薄弱;制度上条块分割,使生态环境保护和建设各项措施难以落实。西部地区作为我国的生态屏障,其生态环境事关整个民族的生存质量和发展空间,也是西部地区发展的制约性因素,生态环境建设成为西部人民生存和发展的关键问题。由此,在西部开发中要坚持生态建设与富民增收的双重原则,实现生态效益和经济效益在大开发中的有机统一。     

文化生态——文化哲学研究的新视野——兼论当代中国文化生态及其培育

"文化生态"对文化的总体特质、价值指向和未来路途等有着不可忽视的影响,但却没有引起文化哲学足够的关注.文化哲学视野中的文化生态研究应致力于对一定社会文化大系统内部各种文化关系的探讨,并以此作为解读文化演进和文化变迁的重要依据.改革开放以来,中国文化生态已经发生了历史性的变革,但仍然相对失衡,培育健康和谐的文化生态将是今后文化建设的主要任务之一.     

侗族大歌赖以产生的生态环境及其嬗变与保护

本文运用生态学理念对侗族大歌赖以产生的环境、嬗变与保护进行了实证的分析与研究。我们认为,侗族大歌的产生和传承与其自然的和人文的生态环境密切相关,生态环境的变化诸如语言的改变、传承的断裂和传承载体的变化以及经济社会的发展,引发大歌的历史嬗变和濒临失传的危险。据此,作者从用生态保护的理念、对大歌进课堂的再认识和定位、培养专业创作人员和大歌名人、构建大歌文化产业机构等方面,提出了对侗族大歌进行保护的思路与视角。     

论我国公共管理体系中政府的几个问题

我国的公共管理是一个由多元主体构成的体系.其中,政府的主导地位与作用是不可或缺的.善于认识和处理好政府与自然生态、社会生态、自我生态的关系,政府的二重属性、领域特质及与科学、民主、依法管理的关系,“过渡型政府”所必然担当的“后统治”、“后管理”与“有限服务”的关系,构建“复合型政府”或“综合型政府”,是公共管理实践工作...     

On Zen and Ecology Health Dimenshon

There are three levels in the Interaction between Zen and ecology. First, Zen and ecology focus on illness caused by ecological problems,Disease pain is the basic point between Zen and ecology. Secondly, although Zen can improve health conditions, but this is just one of the results. The most important of Zen is “prajna”. The real world which “prajna” regard is same with ecology. The two emphasis on“ Ecological cycle”concept.Finally,because the philosophy of Zen focus on liberation, so the heath quality of Zen is better than general health.     

Rangeland Degradation in North China Revisited? A Preliminary Statistical Analysis to Validate Non-Equilibrium Range Ecology

Over the past decades, the concepts of carrying capacity and Clementsian vegetation succession have come under attack from the theory of Non-Equilibrium Range Ecology. The new theory hypothesises that in arid regions with high rainfall variability the ecology is mainly determined by climatic and not biotic factors, such as animal grazing. The argument carried further implies that 'rangeland degradation' or 'desertification' are not caused by overgrazing but are part of a natural process of vegetation decline and growth in response to rainfall, which ruminant numbers merely follow. Few empirical studies involving time-series data have been executed to substantiate Non-Equilibrium Range Ecology. This article, hopes to make a contribution to the current debate with a statistical validation of one of its main postulates: the correlation between ruminant numbers and rainfall. The analysis is conducted with figures from the People's Republic of China: a state in which rangeland policy is an outstanding example of management on the basis of carrying capacities and Clementsian succession theory.     

县域金融生态环境评价指标体系研究

借鉴已有研究成果,结合县域金融生态环境评价指标体系的构建原则,区分了目标层、准则层、指标层三个不同的层次,构建了以经济发展、政府能力、法治信用环境为一级指标,由四十六项具体指标组成的县域金融生态环境评价指标体系,并提出以模糊综合评价法为指导,以头脑风暴法为基础对各项指标赋以权重。     

文化景观遗产:城市化时代的价值重构

文化景观遗产是人类在劳动创造及与自然互动过程中所形成的文化和自然的复合体,其所承载的内容反映了特定年代人们的观念、意识和能力,因而其价值也就具有了天然的唯一性。在文化景观遗产保护问题上,我们必须要面对的首先是文化景观遗产所依托、所蕴含的场地、场所、场景这三个基本构成要素,其次是应该如何将文化景观遗产有效纳入城市文化生态体系,使之成为我们新精神家园的有机构成内容,并真正完成其价值重构的历史使命。     

中国生态补偿机制的缺陷与改革

建立生态补偿机制是深入实施新一轮西部大开发的重要内容。我国生态补偿机制存在着多方面的实践和理论缺陷。这些缺陷导致惠及东部和全国的生态治理相当程度上是在西部单方面付出情况下进行，尤其是西部少数民族地区当地各族农民单方面付出情况下进行。在理论层面，现行生态补偿理论主要局限在生态补偿的必要性、政府税收方面，不足以解决当地农民“失有所得”问题。为此，应该以“补偿还原”为核心和主要改革方向，进行中国生态补偿的机制建设。     

From sustainable development through green growth to sustainable development plus

Abstract

From sustainable development (SD) through green growth to sustainable development plus (SD+)! Does the ‘+’ really matter? This is the question that brings life to this article and the answer is: YES, it does. The ‘+’ makes a huge difference especially for developing countries such as those from Africa that for a long time have not been fully brought on board in shaping global discourses and the preferred future global development agenda. This article argues that the time has come for globally privileged countries of the North to realise that operationalising ‘The Future We Want’ after Rio+20 demands that developing countries be accorded unpolluted space to contribute to providing answers to difficult and elusive questions on the unsustainable ways of the past development paradigms. Among such questions are: When will the issue of resource intensive development and overconsumption be finally answered? Can green growth transition be part of the solution? How will a post 2015 framework best address the needs of developing countries? The conclusion is that SD+ signals a deeper, wider and knowledge-based understanding of global (un) sustainable perspectives that result in global citizens understanding The Future We Do Not Want.