民间文献:妇女史研究资料的价值与利用

民间文献中有关妇女的内容丰富,呈现出多样性、民间性、鲜活性的特点。这些特点决定了它们在妇女史研究中既能弥补正史资料的不足与缺陷,又在一定程度上为研究领域的扩展和深入提供重要的支撑。但目前的妇女史研究中,民间文献资料搜集与运用还相对薄弱。本文即以碑刻、契约、家谱以及其他形式的民间文献资料为内容,讨论了民间文献在妇女史研究中的重要价值。     

马克思的人学理论探微

马克思的人学理论的思想渊源是西方的人学思想,虽然西方的人学思想蕴涵着丰富的内容,但是由于脱离了人的现实性和实践性,决定了他们的人学思想陷入空想。马克思、恩格斯从人的需要出发,探讨了人的本质在于其社会性,确立了实现人的自由的最高价值目标。为我国坚持以人为本的＂科学发展观＂、构建社会主义和谐社会、以及实现人的自由全面发展提供了理论依据。     

可持续发展位:当代国际关系研究的新视角

研究视角的选择对于国际关系理论的构建具有重要的意义.在新的时代背景下,由生态位发展而来的可持续发展位可作为当代国际关系研究的新视角.可持续发展位有其特定的内涵,它与综合国力、国家权力、国家利益和国家的国际地位有着密切联系,但又存在着重大区别.可持续发展位对当代国际关系研究具有十分重要的理论意义和现实意义.     

试论我国行政强制执行权的合理配置

改革开放以来,我国形成了以法院执行为主,以行政机关执行为辅的行政强制执行制度。但由于已有法律对此划分得过于原则和宽泛,在实际执行过程中带来了一些问题。回顾研究了我国行政强制执行的理论和实践,考察分析了国外行政强制执行的状况,在此基础上提出行政强制执行权配置的"公正、效率、协调"的原则,并具体提出了在法院和行政机关之间分配强制执行权的主张和建议。     

上市公司信息披露对个体投资者行为的影响——基于行为金融的实验研究

在假设我国股票市场中的个体投资者存在非理性的前提下,运用实验研究方法,考察上市公司信息披露对个体投资者投资行为的影响程度。从中发现:个体投资者存在着过度自信的心理,对上市公司信息披露的关注和敏感度不高;从上市公司财务和非财务信息披露的影响来看,个体投资者受前者的影响更显著一些,但不存在过度反应,而对后者则反应不足。这表明应进一步完善我国上市公司的信息披露制度,以尽快得到广大个体投资者的认可。     

＂With faces hidden while the walls were tightening＂： Applying international human rights standards to forensic psychology

This paper considers the relationship between forensic psychology and international human rights standards （and about the relationship between mental disability law and such standards in general）, especially in the contexts of the sorts of cases in which forensic psychologists are involved, the special issues in the context of nations with developing economies, and the relevance of international mental health norms. I conclude by focusing on the use of therapeutic jurisprudence as an interpretive tool, and offering suggestions as to how the practice of forensic psychologists can and should best incorporate international human rights standards and principles in their work.     

大学新生心理健康调查透视及应对

通过分析5所高校大学新生的心理健康调查结果,揭示大学新生出现的心理健康问题主要表现在人际关系、生活环境、家庭经济、学习压力、情感问题、就业压力等方面。通过了解大学新生不同群体的心理健康问题,有针对性地做好大学新生心理健康教育工作,促进大学新生的身心健康发展。     

对完善我国廉政法律法规制度体系建设的思考

党的十七届四中全会把反腐倡廉建设放在了更加突出的位置,鲜明地提出推进反腐倡廉制度创新的命题和思路,要求最大限度地减少体制障碍和制度漏洞,完善防治腐败体制机制,提高反腐倡廉制度化、法制化水平。本文结合四中全会关于廉政法律法规制度创新的思路和要求,回顾总结了建国以来廉政法律法规制度建设的成果和经验,分析了当前我国廉政法律法规制度建设当中存在的问题,并就如何完善我国廉政法律法规制度体系建设提出了参考性建议。     

Punishment justifications in rape cases: a community study

Norway is one of the countries with the most progressive criminal justice systems in the Western world. Traditionally, the Norwegian criminal justice system has been mainly based on treatment and deterrence perspectives. While it is believed that criminal justice practices should be in accordance with public attitudes, few studies in Scandinavia have investigated public attitudes towards criminal justice sanctions in a methodologically sound manner. The current study is the first to investigate the attitudes of the Norwegian public towards punishment of rapists. In a Norwegian community sample (N = 475) from 2005, participants found the typical sentencing severity of a convicted rapist too lenient. The participants did report that as a global sentencing orientation, they preferred incapacitation. When presented with a specific rape case, their sentencing judgements were oriented towards both incapacitation and retribution, but their global orientation were not related to their specific judgements. Aggravating circumstances (e.g. violence was used) were found to influence the participants’ judgements more than when no aggravating circumstances were present (e.g. no violence was used). Few gender or educational differences were found, which indicates that these attitudes towards punishment of rapists are quite consistent across demographical groups.     

How Media Exposure Relates to Laypersons’ Understanding of Psychopathy

While conceptualization of psychopathy has evolved, so too has the public's relationship with psychology changed. Concurrently, portrayal of psychopaths has made several shifts, both through nonfiction sources and in popular film and television. Psychopathic villains of the mid‐20th century have made space for a growing cast of protagonist psychopaths. This study examined whether a relationship existed between exposure to fictional psychopaths and how lay individuals conceptualize psychopathy. Specifically, this study explored conceptualization differences based on exposure to antagonist versus protagonist fictional psychopaths. Surveyed community participants supported earlier research suggesting mixed misunderstanding of psychopathy. Additionally, higher exposure to protagonist psychopaths was associated with higher endorsement of flattering distractor traits, reflecting a kind of romanticized psychopathy. These findings have legal, practical, and ethical implications, including the potential for biased jurors, confounded research about psychopathy's labeling effect, and questions about how psychologists should respond on an individual and systemic level.