培育发展农村信息消费,促进农业现代化发展

中共十八大报告提出了走“新四化”同步发展的道路,其面临的根本问题是在快速推进工业化、城镇化和信息化发展的同时,促进农业现代化同步协调发展。该文剖析了中国实现农业现代化过程中面临的主要问题,分析了发展农村信息消费j对农民、农业企业、农业生产方式等的作用,提出了通过培育和发展农村信息消费,可加快实现农业现代化,最后通过借鉴发达国家和先进地区的经验,提出了促进农村信息消费以加快实现中国农业现代化的具体对策建议。     

新型城镇化背景下农业转移人口市民化的法制保障研究

当前,有序推进农业转移人口市民化是提高城镇化质量的核心内容,在我国经济社会发展中具有举足轻重的地位。法律政策对于包括城镇化在内的各种社会发展进程始终具有主导性作用,现行土地、户籍、就业、教育等方面的法律政策中一部分内容存在阻滞农业转移人口市民化的作用,必须消除这些法律政策桎梏,为下一步推进全面深化改革打开空间。     

唐代商品性农业的发展和农产品的商品化

唐代商品性农业发展和农产品的商品化在广义农业的许多方面均有所表现,不仅在粮食作物的种植生产、销售和磨粉、酿酒、榨油等农产品的技术加工业方面,而且在茶叶、甘蔗、桑、麻、棉花、蔬菜、水果、花卉、药材等经济作物的种植生产以及畜牧业、林业、渔业和副业等方面都有这种情况,代表了唐代社会经济发展的一些新的态势和动向。     

Blairite Modernisation and Countryside Policy

When New Labour came to power in 1997, the party's manifesto had little to say about rural policy, beyond a proposal to allow a free vote to ban hunting with dogs and a commitment to establish a right to roam—essentially 'old Labour' and symbolic issues. However, in its early years the Blair government became drawn more heavily into rural policy reform and increasingly came to see rural issues as a territory on which its grand project of national renewal and modernisation could be played out. This article reviews the rise and fall of rural policy under New Labour, and charts how the aftermath of the 2001 foot and mouth disease crisis eventually saw rural issues marginalised within government. It shows how the Blair governments' strange and unexpected excursion into reforming rural and agricultural policy provides a case study of the rise and fall of modernisation more generally.     

从和泰茶业经营模式谈铜仁地区农业产业化经营

农业产业化是贫困地区农村经济发展的重要途径。考察分析铜仁和泰茶业有限公司的成功经营模式,对铜仁地区搞好农业产业化经营,促进经济社会跨越式发展,有几点十分重要的启示。     

Public–Private Partnerships in International Agricultural Research: An Analysis of Constraints

Public–private partnerships are a potentially important means of conducting pro-poor agricultural research in many developing countries. Yet within the international agricultural research sector, there are few examples of successful collaboration that have contributed to food security, poverty reduction or agricultural development. This study hypothesizes that partnerships between public research agencies and private, multinational firms are constrained by fundamentally different incentive structures; prohibitive costs, both direct and indirect; mutually negative perceptions between the sectors; and high levels of competition and risk associated with valuable assets and resources. Based on a survey of key stakeholders and a review of the literature, findings suggest that the primary impediments to partnership are perceptions, competition and risk, while issues of costs and conflicting incentives are secondary. These findings suggest that investment in innovative organizational mechanisms and supportive public policies could facilitate more, and more successful, public–private partnerships in pro-poor agricultural research.     

关于贫困地区培植农业产业化龙头的几点认识

20世纪 90年代中期以来 ,农业产业化不仅在发达地区农村普遍推行 ,而且也逐渐为贫困地区所认识 ,正日益成为贫困地区农村工作的一个热点。在实际中 ,各地都把龙头企业作为农业产业化的关键 ,把培植龙头企业列为政府规划的重点。本文将结合贫困地区的实例 ,对龙头企业的界定和发展途径谈点认识和体会     

毛泽东的农业合作化与邓小平的农业第二个飞跃比较分析

毛泽东的农业合作化与邓小平的农业第二个飞跃都把发展集体经济作为农业的首要问题。但二者在发展的基础条件、推进方式、根本动力、集体经济实现形式以及最终目标等方面存在很大区别,是完全不同的两个理论体系。     

长春市农业产业结构调整的问题与对策

农业产业结构的调整是长期的、动态的战略性调整.虽然长春市在农业产业结构调整方面取得了一些显著的成效,但继续采取切实可行的措施,不断地调整、优化农业产业结构,是长春市推动农村经济发展的重要任务.     

Antitrust, Marketing Cooperatives, and Market Power

Marketing cooperatives are common in agricultural markets. This article explores their price and welfare effects and relates to antitrust legislation in the United States, the European Union, and some of the EU member states-in particular, Sweden. Welfare is higher with a monopoly cooperative than with a profit-maximizing monopoly, if the scope for price discrimination is small and if the world-market price is low relative to the domestic price. As the world-market price rises (or as price discrimination becomes more important), the welfare effect is reversed. The price-discrimination effect suggests that, as a marketing cooperative integrates vertically, welfare may fall. These results carry over to a duopoly with a cooperative firm and a profit-maximizing firm. In such a duopoly, the cooperative behaves more aggressively and obtains a larger market share. Empirical evidence supports these conclusions.