对我国商业秘密保护中竞业禁止问题的新思考

大量商业秘密侵权案件表明,人才流动已成为商业秘密流失的重要途径.另一方面,自主择业又是劳动者依法享有的权利.平衡商业秘密权利人、雇员以及社会公众等各方面的利益,对于促进企业发展以及人力资源的合理分配从而构建和谐社会显然具有重大意义.于2008年1月1日起施行的<中华人民共和国劳动合同法>中一个重要进展是对商业秘密保护中竞业禁止制度做出了较为明确的规定,在对我国当前关于商业秘密保护中竞业禁止问题的立法状态的理性分析的基础上,提出完善我国商业秘密保护中竞业禁止制度的新思考.     

经营者场所安全责任的合理边界

经营者场所安全责任,是指经营者在提供商品或服务时,因为经营场所的安全未能达到保障消费者人身、财产安全的法定要求或者合同约定的标准,导致消费者人身、财产遭受损害,从而应当承担的民事责任。其责任范围包括时间、空间、对象三方面,安全责任随着服务延伸而扩展。受害人与经营者就场所安全责任发生的争议主要是:侵权责任还是合同违约责任,过错责任还是无过错责任,比例赔偿还是全面赔偿,原告举证还是被告举证。经营者承担的场所安全责任应当以防范设施有效、警示明确、管理谨慎周到、制止侵害果敢、实施救助及时、保全证据妥善作为合理边界。     

Homicide and economic conditions: A replication and critique of M. Harvey Brenner's new report to the U.S. Congress

M. Harvey Brenner has produced two influential studies of the social costs of unemployment, economic inequality, and economic growth, both sponsored by the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress. This paper reports the results of an effort to reproduce Brenner's findings for homicide from his more recent (1984) study. Our conclusions are as follows. (1) Although not obvious from his write-up, Brenner's 1984 results differ substantively from his earlier results. (2) We are unable to reproduce his reported findings. (3) There are serious methodological problems with his procedure for choosing a regression specification.     

Calculating and Believing: Ideological Norms in the Cradle of Utility Maximization

An individualist approach to political phenomena is not necessarily an economic approach. We can assume that beliefs and commitments as well as selfishness motivate individuals. Ideology provides a basis for individual choice for policy makers and for citizens and is as much a micro-foundation as narrow “self-interest.” Employing a “least-likely” case approach this paper shows that we can find legitimacy and norm-sensitive behavior in the cradle of utility maximization, the firm. In this paper I will lay out some puzzles found in the general areas of business, politics, and policy-making and show how the particular piece of behavior can be understood within the logic of ideological frameworks and the normative acceptability or legitimacy of actions. The purpose is more an “analytical narrative” than a systematic empirical investigation. It suggests the critical importance of examining the normative as well as the self-interest foundation of behavior. To that end, the empirical context of the discussion is provided by business social responsibility, by business participation in elections, by a snapshot of an ideologically driven political career, and by an antibusiness policy decision. The narrative moves from the generosity of business corporations, to foreign-owned corporations' political activity decisions in the host country, to Mrs. Thatcher and the median voter, and finally to the decision to abolish the slave trade.     

试论非法经营同类营业罪主体的立法完善

非法经营同类营业,是公司、企业有关人员违反竟业禁止义务而实施的非法竟业行为。我国刑法将其主体的存在空间限定为“国有公司、企业”的董事、经理,这种限定突出了保护国有公司、企业利益的目的,但与公司法等有关法律的规定不相衔接,不利于公有制为主体、多种所有制经济的共同发展和非国有经济的刑法保护,有必要予以完善。     

互助保险及其在构建和谐社会中的作用

互助保险是介于社会保险和商业保险之间的一种以互助互济为特征的保险形式,具有其独特的涵义和性质。在当前创建和谐社会的过程中,社会保险、商业保险受各种因素的影响,尚未发挥应有的作用。因此,通过广泛开展这种互助互济的保险形式,将能有效满足弱势群体的保险保障需要,促进整个社会保障体系的健全和完善,为构建和谐社会发挥其应有的作用。     

"人去楼空"的法律思考

“人去楼空”是一形象称谓 ,意指经营者违反法律的规定或合同之约定擅自改变经营场所或者随意中断、终止经营的情况。它严重地侵犯了出租人、供货商 ,尤其是广大消费者的合法权益 ,扰乱了社会主义市场经济秩序 ,危害很大。从性质界定、成因分析、法律对策等方面对“人去楼空”现象进行了全面的分析和深入的探讨。     

家族企业实施委托代理机制的困境和对策

导致家族企业内部委托代理机制效率低下的原因是多方面的 ,除了职业经理人道德水准不高之外 ,还有其它一系列因素。从企业内部而言 ,业主浓厚的集权情结、有限的知识存量、信息分享风险、业主诚信的丧失 ;从外部来说 ,职业经理人市场滞后 ,法制环境欠佳。要使委托代理机制根植于家族企业 ,必须采取综合性措施 ,而非仅仅从单方面提高经理人职业道德。     

单位商业贿赂犯罪刑法适用疑难问题解析

单位商业受贿犯罪无须整体证明单位利用职务上的便利,但须局部证明有关直接责任人员利用了商贸经济活动的运作性、管理性、交易性权力。直接责任人员的商业贿赂行为、意志及由此产生的定罪与量刑,不能脱离所属单位的特征、性质而存在。     

社会信用缺失下的我国家族企业发展

我国家族企业发展与经济市场化趋势相背离,在规模不断扩大的同时,内部化趋势进一步强化,重要因素之一在于社会信用缺失。要消除家族企业与市场环境间的矛盾,主要出路在于建设社会信用体系。