How Can Business Share Responsibility for Disaster Resilience?

This paper contributes to knowledge of disaster resilience policy implementation in Australia and proposes measures to strengthen partnerships between government and the business sector to enhance national disaster resilience capacity. In Australia, business makes a significant contribution to disaster relief and recovery. Even so, there are unexplored opportunities to enhance the role of business in disaster resilience, particularly through partnerships with government. The extent that state, regional and local‐level disaster plans engage business in disaster relief and recovery is described and their relatively less prominent involvement in disaster resilience is discussed. Examples of disaster resilience policies and their capacity to influence business practices to support disaster resilience are introduced with suggestions for how they can be enhanced. Some potential benefits and pitfalls of public–private sector collaboration are explored and it is noted that, in disaster resilience settings, these risks can be ameliorated through appropriate implementation.     

论人工智能生成内容的信息权保护

将人工智能生成内容视为著作权法意义上的作品,不符合著作权法关涉作品的规范教义,不利于个人乃至社会整体知识水平的提升,违背著作权法的价值追求。顺应时代发展规律的信息权应该成为权利,符合权利生成法理标准的信息权可以成为权利。人工智能生成内容本质属于应受法律保护的信息,将人工智能生成内容归入已然获得权利证立的信息权对象范畴,可高效实现关涉信息的多元价值诉求。人工智能所有人通常具有生成价值信息、控制信息传播的动机与能力,且实际享有信息权益、承担信息侵害他人权益的责任,应成为人工智能生成内容的信息权主体。     

网络版权侵权的若干问题研讨

随着网络技术的飞速发展 ,传统版权制度受到了挑战。近年来 ,国内出现了一系列网络版权侵权纠纷案件 ,使得网络版权保护面临的问题日益突出。为了更好地保护网络版权人的合法权益 ,维护市场秩序 ,有必要对网络版权侵权的类型、侵权案件的管辖、侵权纠纷中权利主体和证据效力的认定、侵权责任的归责原则等方面进行研讨。     

论版权的淡化

文章借鉴商标淡化理论,考虑到社会公共利益保护的需要,从利益衡量的角度出发,论述了在一定条件下版权人的权利应该让位于社会公共利益的实现,从而构成作者所谓的版权的淡化.     

图书馆数字化建设与复制权

复制权是著作权人最基本的权利。图书馆的数字化建设,无论是开展数字资源建设,还是提供数字化服务,都离不开复制。复制权也是图书馆数字化建设中涉及到的著作权问题最多的一种权利。因此,需要对图书馆数字化建设做具体分析,明确什么样的复制是合理使用,什么样的复制是侵权。这样,才能保证图书馆数字化建设得以顺利进行。     

Commercial activities and copyright in Australian universities

With government funding for most Australian universities below 60% and falling a major strategic emphasis for universities has been on securing other sources of operating revenue, including commercial opportunities and partnerships. The implication of increasing commercial activities such as non-award and tailored professional programmes, contract research and consultancies within a university environment raises a number of issues in relation to copyright. This paper will discuss whether the educational provisions (including section 200AB introduced in the 2006 amendments) or the fair dealing provisions within the Copyright Act could be applied if copyright material is reproduced as part of a commercial activity undertaken by a university.     

The Trouble with Moral Rights

It is usually argued that moral rights are severely handicapped by their inconsistent entrenchment in common law and civilian legal systems. This article argues that the main trouble with moral rights protection is that the justifications for the existence of these rights are riddled with internal inconsistencies generated by the vagaries of copyright exploitation. Harmonising moral rights protection or using moral rights justifications cumulatively may not resolve the theoretical inconsistencies. Copyright protection must therefore be seriously overhauled if moral rights are to be widely perceived as vehicles for protecting authors' rights.     

浅议加入WTO后我国著作权的保护问题——兼评修订后的著作权法

加入WTO后 ,我国的著作权保护面临着许多实际问题。为此九届全国人大常委会第二十四次会议对《中华人民共和国著作权法》进行了全面修改 ,以适应这一新形势的要求。     

The Outer Limits of Copyright Law – Where Law Meets Philosophy and Culture

This article engages in a cultural critique of copyright law. The point is to explain how and why this body of law is culturally exclusive, notwithstanding the claims made by judges and others that the law is culturally open and inclusive. This involves a discussion of the relationship between philosophy and law, and of how this nexus has been misrepresented by the courts and in recent writings on the subject. Analysis centres on a discussion of Australian case law involving indigenous claims of communal ownership of copyright and the treatment of technology when it comes to attributing authorship.     

论著作权集体管理组织的注意义务

著作权集体管理组织的注意义务的存在基础在于法律设置权利义务的公平性与公正性。著作权集体管理组织在与作者订立集体管理合同时,有义务审查该作者提供的作品的权利归属及作品的法律状态;在与作品使用人订立著作权许可使用合同时,有义务审查该使用者申请使用的作品是否属于著作权集体管理组织的会员作品;在已经授权作品使用人使用作品后,有义务审查作品使用人对作品的使用情况是否符合法律规定及合同约定。在法律中明确规定著作权集体管理组织的注意义务能有效降低法律成本,减少纠纷的发生。