Erzählungen des Kindes‐ und Erwachsenenschutzes: Eine Anwendung und Erweiterung des Narrative Policy Frameworks

The Child and Adult Protection Authorities (KESB) have been the subject of controversial discussion since their establishment in 2013. The reform of the Guardianship Law provided for an institutional shift away from local guardianship authorities to regional specialist authorities. This article uses the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) to examine the history of today’s controversy, simultaneously proposing an analytic strengthening of said framework. Previous NPF studies summarize policy actors into opponents and proponents. As a result, we do not know whether different actors use different narratives. We therefore separate the expert from the MP discourse. The analysis shows that the experts' arguments for a new institutional arrangement and a person‐oriented narrative dominated, which put the fundamental rights of the persons affected by guardianship measures up front. The study contributes to the understanding of the current controversy, in which a person‐oriented narrative seems to be dominant again, directed against the new authorities.     

论虚拟财产及其法律保护

进入21世纪以来,随着现代信息网络技术的迅猛发展,互联网络开始走入并深深地影响着人们的生活,同时,虚拟财产也进入人们的视野。由于人们对虚拟财产的法律属性认识不一,产生了大量法律纠纷,影响了社会秩序,损害了当事人的权益。剖析虚拟财产的属性,选择适当立法模式,为虚拟财产提供及时有效的法律保护,有着较强的实践意义。     

论公共财产权的法律性质——对《宪法》第12条第1款的一种解释

现行《宪法》第12条第1款规定:社会主义的公共财产神圣不可侵犯。公共财产权这一权利有别于一般的财产权和私人财产权,其主体是国家和集体,客体包括一般客体和特殊客体,它的实现需要从积极和消极两个方面推进,对它的保护应从源头抓起,同时需要在整个过程中加以治理。只有真正实现公共财产权,社会主义的公共财产神圣不可侵犯才不至于只是一个宣示。     

技术创新领域的知识产权融资担保

知识产权质押是技术创新的知识产权融资担保方式，但其并不是技术创新知识产权融资担保的唯一担保方式。我国的技术创新知识产权融资担保中，有关知识产权融资担保操作程序和融资担保配套措施的法律有待完善。     

人的样式是我国财产权制度的基础

人权是马克思主义的出发点。人的样式的多样性、复杂性以及个性与社会性的统一，是人的制度与文化的基础；而人的样式本质上是个体性与社会性的对立统一，它决定了我国的产权结构必然是个人所有制与公有制的对立统一。这也是向自然的回归。     

论没收财产刑的立法完善

没收财产刑是我国最为严厉的附加刑,现行刑法对之作了大量的规定.虽然没收财产刑有其优越性所在,但也有其弊端数量太多、范围太滥、不便操作、过于严厉等,应对此加以完善.     

财产权利、个人自由与国家繁荣

财产和财产权是文明社会的标志，衡量一个社会的文明程度就是看财产权在该社会中得到保护的程度。法学、政治学和经济学等学科对财产权都给予相当关注。作为市场经济基础的财产权，事关个人自由和国家繁荣。1978年以来的中国改革，必然逻辑性地催生私有财产权的回归。     

REEVALUATING WHERE WE STAND: A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY OF AMERICA'S FAMILY JUSTICE SYSTEMS

The call for court reform remains critical in the face of the growing complexity of burgeoning family law cases nationwide. Many states have restructured their court systems using the unified family court model, resolving legal, personal, emotional, and social disputes with the aim of improving the well‐being of families and children. Other states utilize the traditional approach, resulting in cases being handled in a fragmented, time‐consuming and expensive manner. In this article, Professor Barbara A. Babb presents the results of her nationwide survey regarding how each state handles family law matters. The survey is a follow‐up to her comprehensive 1998 survey and her 2002 survey update. The results of the recent analysis reveal that a total of thirty‐eight states now have either statewide family courts, family courts in selected areas of the state, or pilot or planned family courts, representing seventy‐five percent of states. The number of states without a specialized or separate system to handle family law matters has decreased from seventeen states in 1998 to thirteen in 2006. These changes are significant when one considers the complexities involved in court reform. The need for court reform remains an urgent one, as family law cases occupy a significant percentage of court dockets across the country. Families and children deserve a court system where justice is effective and efficient and where their legal, personal, emotional, and social needs are resolved in a therapeutic and holistic manner.     

论和谐社会背景下的物权私力救济

和谐社会建设已经成为我国社会发展的时代主题,和谐社会的构建离不开物权保护中的私力救济。在宪政和法治原则的关照下,在物权公力救济占主导地位的情形下,对物权私力救济的内在底蕴、外在表征、成立要件和存在限度及其与和谐社会架构之间的内在关联进行追问和反思,必将有利于促进人与物的和谐,实现人与人的和谐,进而在一定程度上推动我国和谐社会建设的顺利进行。     

论夫妻一方婚前财产于婚后所生利益的归属

夫妻一方婚前财产于婚后所生利益的归属历来较有争议。本文首先将这些利益划分为孳息、投资收益和增值三个种类;然后对国内学者的不同观点进行了总结;在此基础上提出确定其归属的一般规则和补充规则:一般规则是如果婚后利益的产生体现对方协力则作为共同财产,否则仍为个人财产;补充规则是如果一方仅以婚前财产所生利益为唯一收入来源,则将其中一部分视为共同财产;最后提出完善我国婚姻立法的条文设计方案。