科学发展观与人权事业的全面发展

以人为本的科学发展观,提升了中国人权事业全面发展的新境界,深化了中国人权事业全面发展的新内涵,指明了中国人权事业全面发展的新思路.     

让无处不在的眼睛更敏锐——当前新闻舆论监督的问题与对策

新闻舆论监督在当今社会生活中发挥着日益强大的影响力,是现代社会监督体系的一个重要方面,其作用越来越受到党和政府及社会各界的重视。但是,由于我国正处在经济转型期,新闻舆论监督进程中还存在一些不容忽视的问题,新闻要真正发挥舆论监督作用还存在着一定的难度。要让＂无处不在的眼睛＂在构建和谐社会的今天更敏锐,必须科学认识舆论监督的意义,加快新闻立法进程,健全新闻舆论监督的法律体系,同时建立多层次、多渠道的舆论监督网络,强化新闻工作者的素质提升和形象塑造等,进而探寻我国新闻舆论监督的完善路径。     

新中国成立以来中共执政方式的发展与创新

新中国成立60年来,中国共产党对自身的执政方式进行了艰辛的探索与实践,先后经历了党政相对分离的执政方式、政党指挥型执政方式、政党取代型执政方式和政党引导型执政方式,从而实现了党执政方式的不断发展与创新.     

中国直接投资东盟新四国的区位分析与对策研究

东盟新四国由于有着相似的市场特征与发展共性,适合作为细分后的投资整体区位来研究.通过新近的数据和实证资料,分析东盟新四国直接投资环境的利弊因素以及国企业投资过程中存在的一系列问题,进而提出优化并有效扩大中国企业对东盟新四国直接投资的综合对策.     

重庆市毒品犯罪态势分析及对策研究

近年来,重庆市毒品犯罪案件总数有下降趋势,但大要案件突出,犯罪特点及犯罪人员出现一些新的变化。重庆特殊的地缘因素、庞大的毒品消费市场以及打击毒品犯罪的难度较大使禁毒的形势更加严峻。要通过构筑毒品流入流出防线,斩断毒品流通网络,迫使毒品消费市场萎缩,有效遏制重庆市毒品犯罪态势的恶化。     

犯罪现场勘查工作的几点新要求

新刑事诉讼法的颁布 ,对执法的程序要求越来越高 ,特别是庭审方式的改革 ,对现场勘查工作提出了新的要求 ,因此 ,必须改革目前的现场勘查方法 ,提高现场勘查水平 ,以适应新的要求。     

简论当代中国社会转型及其对法治化的影响

当代中国社会处于由传统向现代转型的深刻变革过程中。社会转型是社会在整体意义上与质的意义上的嬗变。社会转型在各种利益与关系的冲突撞击中追求社会朝法治方向发展 ,同时转型时期的社会环境也为法治的发展提供了契机。     

Cost of ruling as a game of tones: The accumulation of bad news and incumbents’ vote loss

An extensive body of research documents how governing parties generally suffer electoral defeats. Varying explanations have been offered, most of which touch upon the liabilities of policy responsibility. Although media coverage is generally acknowledged as one of these liabilities, few empirical studies have examined how news content affect government support. Based on the fact that voters get their information about politics, policies and societal issues from the media, this article studies how the constant stream of negative news influences incumbent support over a 20-year period in Denmark. Modeling a previously untested argument on the cost of ruling, it shows that the accumulation of bad news throughout tenure exerts a substantial effect on government support.     

Russia’s civil service: professional or patrimonial? Executive-level officials in five federal ministries

ABSTRACT

The issue of poor performance of the Russian federal bureaucracy is addressed by linking performance to type of official, through analysis of biographical data on deputy ministers and division (departament) heads in five federal ministries since 2012, supplemented by internet searches on behavior, particularly of a corrupt nature. Education, previous career experience, and recruitment, including its timing relative to superiors and subordinates, are analyzed, in order to determine whether officials behave primarily as members of patrimonial teams, as members of problem-solving organizations, as self-serving individuals, as the instruments of capture by commercial organizations, or as servants of bureaucratic agency interests. The data do not strongly support any one conclusion, but problem-solving officials have the strongest presence.