Over the centuries: a history of Wollstonecraft reception

ABSTRACT

Both Wollstonecraft’s fame and infamy are attributable to her lived experience as the woman author of the only radical republican feminist text published in the pamphlet war of the 1790s. Yet, her radical republican politics were divorced from her gender politics in the early reception. This paper argues that this separation was subsequently sustained in part by interpretive practices that rest on the suppression of the original split. It shows that over the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, both outside and within academia, the dominant interpretive tendency of neglecting Wollstonecraft’s radical republican politics has deradicalized both her historical political thought and her iconic image. This conventional reception has both enabled and limited the resources made available through Wollstonecraft to feminists throughout history.     

西方女权主义思想在中国的变异

西方女权主义思想在 2 0世纪的中国遭遇到尴尬 ,尤其是对“女权主义”这一外来词语形成的种种曲解或误解 ,造成了众多女性学者对于“女权主义者”立场的不认同等 ,而隐于这种现象背后的原因在于异质的中西文化。女权主义与中国特定的文化相遇和碰撞 ,产生了某种程度的变异 ,由原来激进的、女性自主的行动演变为温和的、有男权参与的、凭借社会政治手段实现的解放妇女的运动。“女权主义”与“女性主义”、“妇女解放”与“解放妇女”的差异不应仅仅被视为词语的偏正关系的变化 ,而更有着深刻的内在民族文化心理上的原因。     

女书:我们的终结,抑或我们的开始

女性在女书中以“我们”的身份言说并存在,藉此放逐父权制。书写与被书写同样危险,我们没有聋,可是我们却哑了。文本意图受到了女书本身表述的破坏,女性在使用女书时掺入男性异质,削弱了女书自身构建的权威,在与男性争夺话语权时显得力不从心。放逐最终遭到放逐。颠覆父权制必须动用男性话语的概念,在其文本内寻找颠覆模式。女书的终结是消除二元对立的必然要求,标志着两性对话进入了新的时代。     

BritCrits: Subversion and submission,past, present and future

This article explores some of the intellectual influences which have shaped the development of Critical Legal Studies in Britain and the contexts in which these influences made themselves felt. It then considers which influences might or should steer Critical Legal Studies in the future. In terms of the past, specific attention is given to the influence of Marxism, Freud and Lacan, feminism, Foucault and Derrida, and recent genres of history-writing. As to the future, the question is asked whether Critical Legal Studies will engage constructively with recent developments in the life sciences and the philosophy of science, and, more generally, whether it will be able to surpass its established mooring in the philosophy of history. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

From Sancitity to Screening: Genetic Disabilities, Risk and Rhetorical Strategies in Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Conception Cases

This analysis scrutinises the rhetorical strategies used by judges in wrongful life and wrongful birth actions as evidence for the assertion that the judicial reading of public policy in such cases has undergone a significant shift which is likely to accelerate as genetic knowledge grows and health care resources shrink. The implications of the predicted move towards increased genetic testing of prospective parents are traversed in relation to feminist analyses of the impact of genetics on reproductive technology. These are viewed as forming a nexus with the current social constructions of disability and the contemporary cultural preoccupation with risk, in a context of the increasing commercial importance of genetic information. It is argued that women cannot make free and informed choices about genetic testing and pregnancy unless legal and social mechanisms which protect those choices are in place. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

社会性别的马克思主义诠释

对社会性别的马克思主义诠释是社会性别理论本土化和丰富发展马克思主义妇女理论的需要。本文认为社会性别是社会历史的产物,消除不合理性别差异的最终目的是人的解放,实现这一目标的途径是在发展生产力的基础上进行制度文化的变革。社会性别理论在某种程度上存在忽视生理区别、片面归因于文化、抹杀性别差异的局限,需要从马克思主义立场加以补充和校正。     

女权心理学及其对西方主流心理学的挑战

女权心理学是西方女权主义运动中的一股重要力量。女权心理学试图揭示西方心理学的内容和方法中的男性中心偏见 ,反对扭曲和病态化女性的经验与行为。在女性心理的研究中 ,它既反对夸大性别差异 ,也反对抹杀和取消性别差异。女权心理学质疑西方主流心理学的科学观和方法论 ,认为自然科学的经验实证范式不适合心理学 ,心理学不可能脱离社会文化的影响而进行价值中立的研究     

跨国公司人权责任研究——人权法新发展及中国的应对机制

跨国公司作为私的行为主体，是否应当承担国际人权责任，成为尚无普遍共识的议题。在民族国家并存的国际社会结构体系内，基于人权目的，由跨国公司母国及东道国对跨国公司的人权违反行为实施防范或惩处行动，被设定为最佳模式。在构建政府主导模式的同时，我国应充分培育和发挥民间人权力量，推动跨国公司尊重和保护人权。     

跨国公司人权责任之法哲学考量与实证分析

尊重和保护人权是传统国际法主体应尽的责任。跨国公司作为私的行为主体，是否应当承担国际人权责任或言承担何种性质的国际人权责任，尚无普遍共识。在民族、国家并存的国际社会结构体系内，基于人权目的，由跨国公司母国及东道国对跨国公司的人权违反行为实施防范或惩处行动，被设定为最佳模式。我国应积极参与国际组织制定跨国公司人权责任体系的行动，表达中国立场。在构建政府主导模式的同时，我国应充分培育和发挥民间人权力量，推动跨国公司尊重和保护人权。     

妇女权利研究的思维转换

既有的妇女权利研究模式在理论上存在诸多的问题,这迫使我们不得不进行思维的转换。这种转换具体体现在以下三个方面:首先,从女性伦理视角出发,加入关怀因素,在具体事务中去理解与关心女性,从而走出传统价值本身所具有的二分性因素的对立。其次,从后现代女性主义的研究视角出发,强调和尊重人的差异性和多元性,反对平等与差异的对立,倡导传统法律话语的转变。最后,从更深层次中超越本质性与建构性的二元化对立,走向一条没有男女划分的发展道路。