人力资本理论研究的最新进展及其现实启示

20世纪80年代后期特别是进入90年代以后,西方人力资本理论研究呈现两个方面的发展趋势:一是经济学视角的宏观研究,代表人物主要是罗默尔和卢卡斯;二是管理学视角的微观研究,代表人物有布鲁金和斯图尔特。进入新世纪特别是近年来,我国相对深入的人力资本理论研究和实证分析蓬勃开展起来了。人力资本理论研究及其最新进展给我们的现实启示是颇多的,主要包括:发挥人力资源能力建设在经济社会发展中的“引领”作用,确立“能力本位”的指导思想;人力资源能力建设的核心是要确立人力资本投资的理念,特别是要重视初中等层次人力资本投资在经济社会发展中的特殊作用;人才培养要强化人才主体的个体投资意识,强调投资回报问题;要重视人力资本的价值计量,以价值计量为基础,优化人们的收入分配;人才培养既要重通用能力,更要重专业化能力;各类人才的能力要求是不一样的,人才培养的内容和重点要有所区别等。     

西方公共行政理论演变中的价值取向

厘清西方行政价值的两种基本取向,有利于我们从整体上更好地把握西方公共行政理论的本质,对于完善我国的行政价值体系具有重要借鉴意义。     

存车收费合同之法律界定

存车收费的法律性质是属于保管合同还是车位租赁合同在我国目前的立法上没有明确的规定。但随着社会经济的发展和私车拥有率的提高,这一问题的重要性日益突出。对这一法律关系的认定直接关系到司法实践中当事人责任和权利义务的划分。本文从这一法律关系的性质、特征、当事人的真实意思和约定的习惯等方面入手进行分析,并结合理论和司法实践中对此存在的争议。旗帜鲜明的提出了自己的观点和看法：“存车收费应定性为保管合同。”以期对司法实践中因这一问题的不确定所带来的混乱有所裨益。     

中国财政法治化创新的法哲学解析

以财政法治化为制度目标 ,根据政府对经济运行的控管程度 ,中国财政制度理论类型可分为“计划类型”、“管理类型”、“服务类型”三类。由于政府在财政理论中的主线作用 ,中国财政法治化创新将引发“社会公共需要的制度化满足”、“权力制衡秩序的完善”、“有限政府理念的确立”、“国家责任机制的启动”、“弱势群体利益的制度化保障”、“区域财政资源不济的公平性协调”等法哲学问题。财政法治化创新体现了“权利本位”的法律精神 ,公共财政制度内涵应是对“以人为本”价值的制度化确认。     

论现代国际关系理论与国际法研究的三次联结及其影响

自现代国际关系理论产生以来,与国际法研究的联结已有三次,均对国际法理论与实践的发展产生很大影响。一战后国际法的繁荣与理想主义对其的重视紧密相关。而在冷战时期现实主义占据国际关系理论与实践的主流的情势下,国际关系理论与国际法研究一度疏远,直到20世纪80年代国际机制理论的兴起才重新拾起这种联结纽带,并为国际法晚近的发展构建了合理性基础。在全球化迅猛发展的背景下兴起的建构主义实现了两个学科的第三次联结,并对国际法的理论与实践产生积极影响。     

Bargaining for justice: A means to resolve competing justice claims

In many types of social situations, individuals defend their claims to a portion of the rewards by arguing that they are just. Although a great deal of research demonstrates that individuals differ in their distribution preferences and thus their beliefs about what is fair, the literature curiously omits consideration of the consequences of these differences, especially the conflict they may engender. This paper first reviews the few attempts to address such justice conflict. The limitations of these approaches suggest concerns to be addressed in an alternative framework. The paper presents a theoretical discussion of this alternative that integrates assumptions about distribution preferences, justice beliefs, conditions fostering the emergence of justice conflict, and elements of negotiation processes as a basic framework for predictions about the bargaining strategies individuals may employ to resolve competing justice claims.     

Fairnes issues and job satisfaction among korean employees: The significance of status value and procedural justice in work orientation

This study investigates how justice or fairness issues such as procedural justice, distributive justice, and status equity affect job satisfaction among Korean employees. Incorporating cultural values and social norms salient in Korea, the study hypothesizes that perceptions of procedural justice enhance more job satisfaction than perceptions of distributive justice among Korean employees. Another hypothesis, based on Korean employees' aspiration for higher occupational status, predicts that perceptions of status equity, i.e., occupational prestige of their current jobs relative to their human capital, also increase job satisfaction more than perceptions of distributive justice. These two hypotheses were tested with a sample of 501 full-time employees in Korea. Supporting the hypotheses, the results indicated that (i) perceptions of procedural justice produce more job satisfaction than do perceptions of distributive justice; and (ii) perceptions of status equity are the most important factor predicting job satisfaction among the three fairness issues. Cross-cultural implications of these findings are discussed in more detail.The author thanks Professor Hyunho Seok and the Korean Social Science Council (KSSC) for their 1990 national survey data sets.     

论民商法价值取向的异同及其对我国民商立法的影响

民法和商法作为调整市场经济关系的重要法律制度,既有密切联系又有一定区别。其区分依据除了要考虑法律的调整对象之外,立法价值取向的差异也是一个非常重要的因素。民法的最高价值取向是公平,立法上采取的是公平优先原则;而商法的最高价值取向则是效益,立法上采取的是效益优先原则。正确认识民法和商法在价值取向上的不同,无论对于理论研究还是司法实践都具有非常重要的意义。     

建构主义理论在商务英语教学中运用和尝试

商务英语课程是一门结合了经济和英语两门学科的综合性课程,运用建构主义教学模式能够很好地发挥教师在教学中的引导和辅助作用,树立以“学生为中心”的教学理念,使学生能够主动学习,真正实现教学目的。笔者以《商务英语综合教程》中《市场营销》一章为例,阐述了运用建构主义教学模式设计、实施和检查教学的过程,并提出了运用该模式对教师的新要求。     

The Influence of Advisers and Decision Strategies on Foreign Policy Choices: President Clinton's Decision to Use Force in Kosovo

In the following paper, I analyze the influence of advisers and domestic political factors on President Clinton's decision to use force against Slobodan Milosevic and the Serbs in Kosovo in March 1999. I present an analysis and examination of President Clinton's decision-making process, using press reports, personal speeches, etc. In other words, I attempt to trace the process by which Clinton came to the decision to use force in Yugoslavia. Specifically, using the poliheuristic theory, I argue that President Clinton's decision was influenced by noncompensatory domestic political calculations and the strong influence of his Secretary of State, Madeleine K. Albright. Examining how advisers interact with one another, their status in the advisory group, and the manner in which presidents solicit information from advisers will further our understanding of how, when, and under what conditions national security-level decision makers make decisions.