学风建设是党校建设的根本

学风建设是党的作风建设的重要内容 ,学风从实质上讲是对待马克思主义的根本态度问题。在学风建设上 ,最容易犯的错误就是教条主义和主观主义 ,表现在理论上是脱离实际 ,思想保守僵化 ,不思进取。要坚持马克思主义的学风 ,必须坚持实事求是的思想路线 ,坚持理论联系实际的优良作风 ,与时俱进 ,开拓创新 ,逐步在党校形成认真学习、民主讨论、积极探索、求真务实的良好学风。     

经济分析理论对涉税犯罪案件侦查之导引

经济理论中的数理分析理论运用到对涉税犯罪案件的侦查中来,可用成本公式“收入-成本= 利润”对涉税犯罪案件的作案手法、证据搜集和线索作分析、确认,从而为经济犯罪侦查人员提供一种新的侦查方法,为涉税犯罪案件侦查创造一种新的思路。     

邓小平法思想的哲学基础

马克思主义哲学是邓小平法思想、法实践形成的理论基础;或者说,邓小平法思想、法实践是对辩证唯物主义和历史唯物主义的立场、观点和方法予以奉行和遵从的产物。整体性与系统性的统一、原则性与灵活性的统一,形象性与深刻性的统一以及重实效的实践性等诸多方面,构成了邓小平现实主义思维的基本方式,也是邓小平法思想的哲学基础的体现。     

新经济政策与列宁社会发展理论

务实和创新是列宁社会发展理论的精髓。它在新经济政策中得到了充分的体现。务实创新精神的贯彻,主要表现在列宁对落后国家发展基点、发展道路、发展主体、发展规律及发展动力等问题的深刻认识中。新经济政策在列宁社会发展理论中占据着重要的地位。     

Advance notice as a means of reducing relative deprivation

Considerable research has documented that global perceptions of proceduralv fairness are associated with reductions in relative deprivation (RD). Less research has examined the specific process elements that lead individuals to perceive procedural fairness. In view of this, several researchers have suggested that providing advance notice concerning a negative decision increases perceived justice and thereby lowers levels of RD. Unfortunately, the evidence for this causal relationship is currently limited and is based upon a small number of correlation and role-playing studies. Thus, the present paper reports on two experimental studies that investigate the causal relationship between advance notice and RD. Findings in Study 1 showed that advance notice impacted the cognitive aspects of RD but not the affective or behavioral aspects. However, some methodological limitations were identified. These were corrected and a second experiment was conducted. This time advance notice lowered both the cognitive and affective aspects of RD but still did not impact the behavioral measure. Results are discussed in terms of Tyler's (1987) group value model.     

The intellectual adolescence of organizational justice: You've come a long way,maybe

To highlight the advances and limitations in the study of organizational justice as reflected by the articles in this issue, the field is characterized as being in its intellectual adolescence. Following this analogy, some signs of scientific maturity are noted. Among these are (a) increased attention to the connections between organizational justice and various organizational processes, (b) expanded efforts toward conceptual refinement, and (c) greater reliance on research conducted in natural settings. At the same time, the adolescent state of the field is also marked by its intellectual awkwardness and immaturity. Indications of this include (a) the absence of guiding theory, (b) an underdeveloped research agenda, and (c) an overreliance on the use of ad hoc measurements. Based on these limitations, suggestions are made for ways of nurturing the field's development. The article concludes with an optimistic vision of tomorrow's field of organizational justice.     

论《水浒传》梁山聚义的起因、性质和结局

《水浒传》中梁山英雄们进行的是一次自发的对上层统治集团的暴力反抗活动，不是一场有预先准备，精心组织的农民起义，他们被“逼上梁山”，从个体来看，大多并不是由于朝廷的压迫，而是由于自身的原因或为梁山集团所逼，但是从群体的角度来看，这么多人被逼上梁山，仍然反映了深刻的社会危机，从这一角度来看，《水浒传》仍然表达了“官逼民反”的思想，只是这“民”主要是流民阶层，正是由于其流民集团的性质，导致其最后走上失败之路，因此，梁山招安就具有必然性。     

邓小平的政策创新思想

邓小平的政策创新思想是邓小平理论的重要组成部分,其基本内容包括政策创新的现实基础、政策创新的条件因素、政策创新的价值取向,三者相互联系、相互贯通。正是因为政策的创新,建设有中国特色社会主义事业才取得了巨大的成就。     

Workplace justice and employee worth

Distributive and procedural justice gain new meaning in light of other distinctions about how organizations value employees (the employees' “worth”). Fair compensation gives employees worth as achieved status: how the employee is like some employees (similarly rewarded) and not like others (dissimilarly rewarded). But employees also want to be treated uniquely as individuals and in other ways to be treated like all other employees, both reflecting worth as ascribed status. Such worth need not involve the distribution of outcomes; it can be gained if procedures function as ends in themselves. Different types of worth thus become the source of different criteria for justice. Based on a paper entitled “Justice as Worth,” which was prepared for the Third International Conference on Social Justice research (held in the Netherlands during July 1991).     

合作作品含义探析

我国著作权立法对合作作品的定义没有做出正面、明确的规定,导致学说和实践对合作作品的认定存在很大的分歧。应该坚持制度创新,将合作作品认定为“由数位作者付出独创性劳动、并且各自的创作意图和合理期望均指向该部以最终形式表现出来的、同一部完整的共同作品。”