毛泽东对抗日根据地社会矛盾调处的理论贡献与现实意义

抗日战争时期,毛泽东创造性地提出民族斗争和阶级斗争一致性理论,为全党正确把握统一战线中独立与自主的关系提供了理论上的指导。依据这一理论,陕甘宁边区综合运用行政、政策、法律等手段,建立了一套较为完整的利益调节机制,为党解决抗日根据地社会矛盾提供了成功经验。     

试论中国特色社会主义理论体系的科学定位

中国特色社会主义理论体系,是包括邓小平理论、“三个代表”重要思想以及科学发展观等重大战略思想在内的科学理论体系,是马克思主义中国化最新成果,是党最可宝贵的政治和精神财富,是全国各族人民团结奋斗的共同思想基础。在当代中国,坚持中国特色社会主义理论体系,就是真正坚持马克恩主义。     

公正：中共执政的价值追求

中共执政的历史经验表明,公正是中共执政的价值取向和核心追求。当前中共执政的公正性主要体现为保证经济、社会的发展符合正义的要求,发展民主,完善国家制度,整合社会。未来中共执政应主要从执政方略、执政体制和执政方式等关键环节着手,以保证分配公正、制度公正、社会公正的实现。     

日据时期旅行文学论述：身份认同与现代性

日据时期旅行文学研究在台湾方兴未艾。台湾文论界通过对旅行日本、欧美、中国大陆的不同游记的论述,探讨日据时期台湾人身份认同的暧昧两难。台湾社会特殊的历史际遇造成其现代性具有多种不同的表现形态。     

中国内地与香港针对妇女和儿童性暴力的理论及实务研究

本文对中国内地和香港的性暴力有关情况进行了回顾研究。通过讨论社会对性暴力的认知说明了法律与社会支持机制及文化观念对受害者的报告和求助行为的影响,总结和评估了现有的干预及服务现状,进而对华人社会今后预防和制止性暴力提出了对策建议:(1)推进法制改革;(2)制定与完善反性暴力政策;(3)发展专业化和专门化的服务;(4)培训专业人员;(5)加强研究。     

政治哲学视域中的性别正义

女性主义对公民资格理论传统的批判在凸现传统公民资格理论中女性之缺席的同时,却由于潜在的性别本质化分析而陷入普遍主义正义伦理的两难,关怀伦理成为女性主义摆脱正义伦理两难处境的另类思考。与以关怀为基础的路径相一致,差异性立场、身份政治转而成为女性主义表达其性别正义诉求的武器。但是如果妇女并非一种统一的性别象征,如何能够提出妇女的政治主张?因此,建构一种基于宽容、对话、理解、友爱、团结基础之上的包容不同身份差异(包括性别差异)的公民身份和公民制度成为继身份政治之后女性主义进一步考虑的重点。     

西方马克思主义政治文化理论探析

从历时态上看,西方马克思主义政治文化理论分为早期、中生代、后现代三个发展阶段,每个阶段都表现出了鲜明的理论特征,并且各个阶段之间又呈现出了逻辑上的“贯通”与“断裂”。从共时态上看,西方马克思主义政治文化理论主要包括哲学、政治学、社会学、文化学四种学理向度,深入研究该理论对构建中国化马克思主义政治文化理论具有重要启发意义。     

中国企业发展战略的文化思考

迎接经济全球化的挑战,适应知识经济发展的社会,加大企业改革的力度,都需要加强企业化建设。企业化作为管理理论、管理思想和管理方式,对网络经济和确定以人为本的现代意识,对形成和谐管理的方式,都具有十分重要的作用。实施企业化管理,建设企业化,应该将企业家化的形成、优良传统的继承、讲求个异化特征放在重要位置加以重视。     

The Complexity of Social Outcomes from Cooperative,Competitive, and Individualistic Reward Systems

Previous research on cooperative and competitive reward systems has investigated the relation between extreme cooperative and competitive conditions, along with an intermediate noninterdependent neutral condition, to numerous outcome variables. This study added two additional conditions to these three usual conditions, between the neutral midpoint and the cooperative or competitive extremes, to see if these intermediate conditions might be distinctive in the outcomes they produced. The study used 240 participants, divided into groups of three that played a board game under these five different reward conditions. Participants' attitudes toward self, others, and task were then assessed and analyzed along with objective measures of performance, measures of self-esteem, state and trait anxiety, and results coded from an autobiographical report in game-defined roles. Results indicated that the intermediate cooperative condition was distinctively different from the extreme cooperative condition in predicted ways, and that the intermediate competitive condition was distinctively different from the extreme competitive condition, but in unpredicted ways. The research also demonstrated that an individualistic condition, which had previously been thought to produce neither a cooperative nor competitive social orientation, in fact produced both, raising questions as to whether reward interdependence, as researchers have defined it, is really the cause of cooperation and competition.     

Procedural Justice,Outcome Favorability and Emotion

This study investigated the effects of procedural justice on discrete emotional responses. Based upon the cognitive appraisal model of emotion, it was argued that the experience of procedural justice (or injustice) allows individuals to derive meaning from favorable and unfavorable allocation decisions. Thus, procedural justice works with outcome favorability to produce a variety of emotional states. These ideas were tested in a laboratory experiment. As predicted, two happiness-related emotions (happiness and joy) and a sadness-related emotion (disappointment) showed only a main effect for outcome favorability. Two anger-related emotions (anger and frustration) were highest when an unfavorable outcome occurred because of an unfair procedure. Higher levels of guilt and anxiety were reported when an unfair procedure resulted in a favorable outcome. Contrary to predictions, a third happiness-related emotion (pride) showed only a main effect for outcome favorability.