中国法治进程中的法律史学（1978—2008）

在1978—2008年的30年中国法治进程中,法律史学发挥了重要作用。它从此前的薄弱基础出发,借改革开放之春风,观照历史服务现实,成为中国法治30年进程初期的显学,为法制建设提供了及时的思想资源与理论支持;随后,它鉴往观今,深入总结历史经验,继续助推法治进程。同时,它传承学术、推陈出新,提升品质、深化研究,使法律史学科得以迅速发展。展望未来,我们有理由相信,经过30年的努力和累积,中国的法律史学将有更加辉煌的前景。     

建国以来中国共产党“正确处理人民内部矛盾理论”的探索、传承与创新完善

人民内部矛盾理论是毛泽东哲学思想研究的重要内容。以邓小平、江泽民、胡锦涛为代表的中央领导集体,在改革开放的新的历史条件下,创造性地丰富和发展了毛泽东关于人民内部矛盾的学说,使党关于正确处理人民内部矛盾的理论和实践达到了新的境界和新的水平。     

马克思恩格斯创立唯物史观的早期思想轨迹

19世纪中叶,马克思恩格斯创立了马克思主义哲学这一真正的科学世界观,马克思称之为“新唯物主义”。这是以实践为基础的彻底的唯物主义世界观。马克思恩格斯将唯物主义的原则彻底地贯彻到历史领域,创立了历史唯物主义即唯物史观,其思想闪耀在马克思恩格斯创立唯物史观早期的很多著作之中,这些著述清晰地展示了唯物史观形成的思想轨迹,为马克思恩格斯唯物史观发展研究提供了完整的线索。     

Authors’ Rights As An Instrument Of Control: An Overview Of The Ideas Of Authorship And Authors’ Rights In Socialist Yugoslavia,And How These Ideas Did Not Change To Reflect The Ideals Of The Socialist Revolution

The purpose of this paper is to show, using the example of socialist Yugoslavia, how and why authors’ rights laws were applied in a socialist regime relying on the same rhetoric of ownership and individualism that marked their use in the capitalist West. In this way, Yugoslav laws have served us as an excuse to examine the connection between rights guaranteed by the legal apparatus and a type of control over creative processes that these rights make possible. Since it is a fact that both single-party socialism and pluralist capitalism have employed the same concept of authors’ rights and authorship, it is our claim that the two systems have been and are equally interested in limiting creative freedom by means of property derived from authors’ rights. To the extent to which Yugoslav legislative, political, cultural, and ideological practice borrowed from the Soviet variety of socialism, we will consider examples from that tradition as well, treating it as the strictest incarnation of Marxism in Europe.

In Search of the Responsible Subject: History, Philosophy and Social Sciences in Criminal Law Theory

This paper examines the way in which English criminal law's conception of responsibility has changed since the eighteenth century, and explores the relationship between changes in legal framework, changes in processes of criminalisation and punishment, and broader social, political and economic changes. It argues that the development of ideas of individual responsibility for crime are responses to problems of co-ordination and legitimation faced by systems of criminal law, and that these problems can be expected to change according to the environment in which the system operates, with important factors including the distribution of political interests and economic power; the prevailing cultural and intellectual environment; the organisation and status of relevant professional groups and the vigour of alternative means of social ordering. Substantively, the paper explores the hypothesis that criminal responsibility has shifted from a conception founded in ideas of character to a capacity-based conception over the relevant period. Methodologically, the aim is to historicise the structure as well as the content of criminal law within a socio-theoretic framework, constructing a dialogue between criminal law theory of a doctrinal and philosophical temper and socio-historical studies of criminal justice.     

论我国历史上对性交易的法律管制

我国法律对性交易的打击虽非常严厉,但性交易却屡禁不止,并愈演愈烈.可见,我国现行的严禁主义存在问题.纵观我国历史大多数时期,性交易是合法的,并且性交易合法时期往往是社会环境比较宽松的时期,也往往是历史上的“盛世”之时.而性交易非法时期也往往是法律环境比较苛刻、社会控制比较严厉的时期.这样的时期里对性交易的管制往往就是严刑峻法,通过这样的管制也往往造成统治者不愿意看到的结果,并且最终都会放开对性交易的管制.     

通向权利之路：汉语“民律”至“民法”的转化

对于民法性质的界定,学界已达成共识.而关于"民法"语源之探讨,虽有所涉及,但仍显不足.本文即较为详尽地梳理了汉语"民法"在近代的缘起,尤其指出了"民律"至"民法"转化的过程及蕴意.     

The historical understanding of female premodern possessions. Problematizing some gender assumptions in the historiography on Teresa de Ávila and Jeanne des Anges

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses how to approach the history of female possessions today. By analyzing some recent contributions applied to two well-known historical figures: Teresa de Ávila (1515–1582) and Jeanne des Anges (1602–1665), I will problematize some of the ongoing history of female possessions. I intend a reflection on two of the current conceptual frameworks that feature the way history explains the subjective experience of these premodern possessed individuals. I focus on two kinds of interpretation: one I call the ‘neurotic’ interpretation, and the other the ‘subversive’ interpretation. Both constructions underpin explanations of women’s divine and demonic possessions, involving historiographical gender prejudices and ahistorical assumptions.     

近五年中国近代妇女史研究综述

近年来妇女史研究取得了可喜的成绩,尤其是体现在有关中国近代妇女史研究方面。五年来,近代妇女史的研究领域不断扩展,在妇女运动和妇女解放思想、妇女教育、妇女职业、妇女生活、妇女人物等方面出现许多颇有见地的论文。但同时仍然存在着一些问题和不足,本文在最后对妇女史的研究作了展望。     

中国共产党与20世纪中国学术研究论纲

中国共产党学术史是中共文化史研究的一个薄弱环节,党史学应加强对中国共产党学术史的研究。