中共“二大”是党的创建任务完成的界碑

中国共产党的创建经历了一个过程。党在创立一年后召开的＂一大＂,对创建中的一些工作没有完成,至＂二大＂,才在理论政治纲领之外制订出指导当前革命奋斗的反帝反军阀政纲和独立完备的党章,作出加入共产国际成为其支部的决策。＂二大＂是党的创建任务完成的界碑。就党的建设论,中共＂二大＂具有使党定型（既以俄共为榜样,又具有中国特点）的意义,其作用胜过＂一大＂。     

“划一”与“创新”的制度困境及其消解以组织理论的视角审视现代西方社会制度的变革

制度创新有其必然性。西方技术理性的片面化发展,使社会政治制度也陷于标准化的技术理性控制之下,最终表现为制度创新与技术理性标准化的冲突,并导致组织冲突的形成与发展。而组织冲突的消解将最终依赖于制度创新,实现制度创新则应该以所有制关系变革为前提。     

旅游精准扶贫对民族村落农户生计影响的比较——基于云贵民族村落的调查数据

发展旅游产业是我国新时期民族村落精准扶贫的重要抓手。在旅游精准扶贫背景下,有必要关注民族村落农户的可持续生计问题。文章选取云贵两种不同旅游扶贫模式的民族村落,对村民进行入户访谈和问卷调查,在DFID可持续生计框架下构建农户生计资本评价指标体系,对比分析其旅游精准扶贫对农户生计的影响。结果表明:不同旅游扶贫模式的村落精准施策不同;不同旅游扶贫模式农户的生计策略选择不同;不同旅游扶贫模式对贫困户的吸纳能力不同。总体上,民族村落农户的生计资本仍然有限,旅游参与型农户的生计资本相对较好,在精准帮扶影响下,除社会资本外,传统务农型农户多种生计资本欠缺。据此提出了其生计资本的提升对策。     

CEPA协议若干法律问题的现实思考

CEPA协议的建立,使内地和港澳地区贸易产生了重大影响。对CEPA产生的意义、法律性质、以及协议内容的研究,有助于CEPA的全面实施。通过法理分析明确了不同税收制度下,世贸组织平等成员方在该协议中的法律地位以及其实施中存在的若干问题,对这些问题的探讨将有助于CEPA的实施和发展。     

程序性辩护之初步研究

程序性辩护是辩护方行使诉权的一种重要方式,其直接目的是促使法庭宣告警察、检察官或法官的程序性违法行为无效,从而使“官方违法者”遭受某种程度的惩罚和制裁,使被侵害的权利获得司法救济。我国应按照诉权与裁判权相互制衡的理论,重新构建程序性辩护制度。当然,当前我国程序性辩护制度的重构还面临很多现实困境和体制上的障碍。     

属地化与新领域:社区工会的组织建设和工作走向

改革开放的深化、市场经济体制的确立和社会转型，导致城市管理重心下移、大量非公有制经济和社会新兴组织出现以及农民工向城市的不断涌入。为维护“两新”组织从业人员和广大农民工的合法权益，传统“单位体制”下的工会组织体系已无法适应其需要，以区域为依托的社区工会应运而生。社区工会工作对填补“两新”组织工建“盲区”具有重要意义。     

“一田两主”的地权结构分析及其改造利用

中国历史上存在的“一田两主”习惯,在地权结构上体现出了二元结构的本质特征,所有权(田底权)和占有权(田面权)并列,各自成为永久性的独立物权。这种地权结构在中国历史上起到了缓解土地稀缺压力、实现“耕者有其田”的作用,其制度资源对于当代中国土地法制的完善仍具借鉴价值。     

对消防官兵伤亡保险制度的思考

军人伤亡保险制度的实施,实现了消防官兵个人保险从无到有的历史性突破。本文主要探讨了此项制度存在的不完善之处,尤其是就军人地方职工在赔偿金额上的不一致,提出了解决上述问题的对策和建议。     

Class forces,transition and the Arab uprisings: a comparison of Tunisia,Egypt and Syria

This article intervenes into an ongoing debate on authoritarian regimes in the Arab world following the uprisings of 2011, in particular addressing the perceived failure of those uprisings to bring about “transition” to liberal democratic models. Drawing upon the method of comparative historical sociology used in seminal analyses of democratization and dictatorship in Europe, Asia and the Americas, the article seeks to explain the varying trajectories of the Arab Uprising states in terms of several structural factors, namely the balance of class forces, the relative autonomy of the state and the geo-political context. The article provides an empirical comparison of the cases of Egypt, Tunisia and Syria as points on a continuum of outcomes following the Arab uprising. The article mounts a critique of the absence of class analysis in mainstream transition theory and hypothesises instead an important role for workers’ movements in bringing about even basic elements of liberal democracy. The empirical comparison is shown to support this hypothesis, demonstrating that in Tunisia, the state where the worker's movement was strongest a constitutional settlement has been reached while Syria, the state with the weakest and least independent workers’ movement has descended into counter-revolution and civil war: the case of Egypt lying between these two poles.     

What the #@!* are they Fighting About?!?: Reflections on Fairness,Identity, Social Capital,and Peacemaking in Family Conflicts

Peacemaking is particularly challenging in family conflicts. Deeply held feelings about identity, fair treatment, moral issues, and protecting social capital often cause people in conflict to make self‐defeating decisions. There are, however, techniques that enable mediators, Collaborative Practice professionals, and other peacemakers to overcome the settlement barriers created by these strongly held views. These techniques include those pioneered by psychotherapists using the Internal Family Systems model, which enables parties to see that their strongly held views comprise only part of the constellation of feelings that they have about the conflict.

Key Points for the Family Court Community:
• Parents who feel that their role as father or mother is in danger often find it difficult to focus on the children's best interests.
• The “rule of reciprocity” causes people who feel wronged to exact even harsher punishment on those who harmed them.
• The concept of “social capital” explains why people care so passionately about whether they are treated fairly and about their reputation for fairness.
• The Internal Family Systems model helps peacemakers to understand how to work with the parties’ ambivalence about settlement versus courtroom vindication.