论作为知识分子写作方式的晚清散文话语建构

梁启超、严复、王韬等晚清的思想者散文家,以散文的方式参与其时代话语的建构.他们的写作凸现着作为公共知识分子写作所通常具有的模式特征.时代的命定、社会身份的规定和个人特殊的心路历程等因素,决定了他们的散文--晚清主流散文,是以时代主题的表达为要务的.这一类散文有着思想的偏至和审美的弱化等特点.     

当代文学不应忽视的“话语”--前苏联文学对中国当代文学的影响

目前我国文学的创作、阅读和批评表面上受西方现当代文学创作、阅读和批评的话语影响很大,但实际上前苏联文学创作、阅读和批评的话语对我国当代文学的深层次的正面和负影响仍存在,而且这种影响很大,还会对未来的中国文学的发展产生深远的影垧.     

公安新闻宣传中的“警方立场”

公安新闻宣传应坚持“警方立场”，以正确引导舆论和维护警方权益。公安机关新闻报道的“警方立场”，首先是对于报道的话语权的坚持，其次是从维护社会稳定、维护公共安全、服务服从公安工作大局的角度和高度考虑问题，分析形势，解说案例。最后是维护警察权威和警察形象，妥善应对警察形象危机。     

话语分析与中共党史研究

话语分析方法不仅为中共党史研究提供了一种新的观察分析问题的视角，有利于拓宽研究的广度与深度，还可以促使研究者对已有研究成果进行反思。     

TEM—8听力讲座的语篇类型和篇章模式思考

语篇类型和篇章模式是篇章语言学的重要范畴。语篇根据不同的交际功能和目的可以分为不同的类型,语篇类型制约着篇章模式和篇章结构。通过对专业英语八级考试中听力讲座部分的试题材料的语篇类型和篇章模式的剖析,提出了学术讲座在篇章层面的应试策略。     

法治话语、法律议论的公众型构过程与背景——以社会诉讼为载体

将民主讨论的过程及其效果置于特定语境之中,并引入到“社会诉讼”的分析手段中解读,可以发现法律议论的型构过程是复线并动态互构的,理想逻辑与社会伦理的讨论场景下的博弈效果呈现非均质的状态,并以对话方式走向沟通与共识。     

Designing for equitable civic engagement: Participatory design and discourse in contested spaces

A common theme of research on participatory democracy and citizen engagement centres on the need for empirical studies that conduct a deep exploration of the nuances and complexities of these processes. This article offers a distinct response to this need through an examination of two ethnographic case studies of a participatory budgeting process in a multilingual, highly diverse community in which Spanish-speaking Latino immigrants were involved. By analyzing participants discourse from the case studies, the findings highlight the risks and rewards of reframing participatory processes as design decisions rather than static procedures.     

知识产权国际博弈与中国话语的价值取向

美国在知识产权全球治理中呈现出一味强化权利保护的价值倾向。受其影响,知识产权保护的国际规则呈现不断强化之势。但是,美国在国内法中存在对知识产权强化保护的平衡机制,有别于其对外片面输出强化保护规则。一味强化保护的知识产权制度会走向偏颇。我国在知识产权国际博弈和对话中需要提出自己的话语和话语体系,其前提是明确本国话语的价值取向。相比历史、文化取向而言,话语构造的价值取向路径具有优越性。在国际博弈中,我国宜秉持并提倡知识产权法的二元价值取向。二元价值取向契合知识产权法基本原理,体现了世界共同价值,其核心作用在于纠偏,我国应坚持和发扬这一价值取向。     

警务英语语篇的经验功能分析

系统功能语言学强调语篇分析的实用性,其框架可用以分析各类英文语篇。以系统功能语言学中的经验功能理论为依据,分析警务英语语料中的样本语篇可以看出,警务英语的经验功能具有及物性,系统严谨客观、指向目标明确、实体属性清晰规范等特征。     

The political importance of labelling: terrorism and Turkey's discourse on the PKK

Labelling the ‘other’ is one of the most relevant aspects in an armed conflict context. Summarising what the opponent is in one single expression is a strong rhetorical tool in any belligerent discourse. The use of the ‘terrorist’ label assumes a particularly powerful role in such a construction. Employing Ole Wæver's layered discursive structure, this article aims to study the discursive practices and political consequences associated with the use of such labels. The political implications of using the ‘terrorist’ label in regards to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Turkish politics will be analysed as an illustrative case study. The period under analysis extends from April 2007 to January 2008, corresponding to the escalation of a security discourse that led to the (brief) Turkish military incursion in northern Iraq in the winter of 2007–2008. The political exposure and intense usage of the ‘terrorist’ label in this period makes it particularly ripe for understanding the political discursive context that shapes Turkey's policies towards this protracted conflict. The focus on this period also sheds light on the political reasons underlying the intractability of this conflict.