加强和创新社会管理——以贵州仲裁工作为视角

创新社会管理的重要内容之一就是有效化解矛盾,而仲裁作为一种带有民间性质的民商事纠纷解决机制,能够公平合理、及时有效地化解社会矛盾,它的中立性、民间性、便捷性等特点都能在社会管理中加以运用和充分发挥;仲裁工作的不断推进和仲裁调解的广泛适用也是贯彻落实科学发展观、创新社会管理的一种体现。     

浅谈统一战线在加强和创新社会管理中的作用

从统一战线对加强和创新社会管理的重要意义入手,分析社会管理思想的理论基础和思想内涵,研究统一战线议政建言的渠道优势、人才荟萃的智力优势、协调关系的功能优势和联系广泛的资源优势,探索总结统一战线服务社会管理的经验和规律,为加强和创新社会管理发挥作用。     

对新颁布《公安机关人民警察职业道德规范》的解读与思考

2011年9月，公安部修订印发了《公安机关人民警察职业道德规范》（以下简称新《规范》）。新《规范》是在《公民道德建设实施纲要》的有力指导和公安队伍建设发展的与时俱进双重背景下对胡锦涛总书记“七一”讲话精神的贯彻。新《规范》体现了从表述形式到表述实质，从逻辑层次到可操作性，从时代性到原则性等一系列的特色，是对我国警察职业道德的丰富和发展。为充分发挥新《规范》的指导作用，我们要加强解读、深入阐释，重视建设、纳入机制，加强修养、不断提高。     

正确理解群众路线与社会主义核心价值体系的关系

当前,在中国特色社会主义事业建设中,要提高我国的综合实力,就必须深入开展社会主义核心价值体系的学习和教育,并将群众路线贯彻其中。二者在本质上都是服务人民、联系群众,并且以实现社会主义价值理念为核心;群众路线在社会主义核心价值体系的学习教育和推广过程中得以丰富和发展;践行群众路线与社会主义核心价值体系的建设都是长期的过程,是曲折中前进的过程。     

对公安派出所档案管理创新的思考

在整个社会呼唤管理创新的背景下,公安派出所档案管理同样需要创新,这可以提升公安派出所档案管理的层次和水平,对加强公安工作具有重要意义。公安派出所档案管理创新的途径包括管理理念、管理手段、管理方法、管理制度等方面。     

统一战线服务社会管理的思考

加强和创新社会管理是党中央从党和国家事业发展全局出发作出的重大战略决策。统一战线与社会管理有着紧密的内在联系,在加强和创新社会管理中担负着义不容辞的责任。     

An Analysis on the Path of Floating Population Service and Management from the Perspective of Social Integration——A Case Study of Yuyao

The rapid increase of migrant population provides sufficient labor resources to the economic and social development. At the same time, it brings the social management with a new topic. Zhejiang Yuyao city conducted an analysis on the path of service management of the floating population from the perspective of social integration, and formed some basic experience. These experiences can be summarized as: the construction of system security system, improve public services, strengthen the positive publicity, and establish the multiple social organizations. The experience of Yuyao and some institutional innovation not only has the enlightenment significance to the service management of the floating population, also produces beneficial enlightenment on the building of a harmonious society: take the specific work, adhere to the principle of "justice" concept, promote the construction management system, and strengthen the multiple governance subjects cooperation. It is the way to construct active governments.     

应急管理能力:多层次结构与发展路径

应急管理能力是应急管理主体为履行应急管理职能、实现应急管理使命而应具备的知识、资源和技能的总和,包括在国家、应急管理部门和应急管理职业人三个层次上的45种能力。在国家层面上,应急管理能力可视为在重大危机状态下的国家治理能力,包括13项关键指征。在应急管理部门层面上,需要发展的核心能力有20种,分布在日常的风险治理、应急准备和突发事件发生后的应急响应多个阶段。应急管理人应当掌握三类知识体系、三类科学素养和六类领导能力。在推进应急管理体系和能力现代化的过程中,我国需要在多个层次上提升应急管理能力。     

Towards a democracy-centred ethics

Abstract

The core idea of this paper is that we can use the differences between democratic and undemocratic governments to illuminate ethical problems. Democratic values, rights and institutions lie between the most abstract considerations of ethics and meta-ethics and the most particularised decisions, outcomes and contexts. Hence, this paper argues, we can use the differences between democratic and undemocratic governments, as we best understand them, to structure our theoretical investigations, to test and organise our intuitions and ideas, and to explain and justify our philosophical conclusions. Specifically, as we will see, a democracy-centred approach to ethics can help us to distinguish liberal and democratic approaches to political morality in ways that reflect the varieties of democratic theory, and the importance of distinguishing democratic from undemocratic forms of liberalism.     

The most plausible pro-coercion view: requiring informed agreement while penalizing non-participation in research

In ‘(Why) should we require consent to research?’ Alan Wertheimer probes whether it is legitimate for the government to ‘coerce’ people into participating in biomedical research, including interventional biomedical research. In debating the rules that ought to govern participation in interventional biomedical research, we should distinguish two separate moral claims. First, interventional research should proceed only when the subject has given her informed agreement. Second, it is legitimate for the state to set a requirement that people participate in interventional biomedical research, and to penalize or punish those who refuse to participate. The most plausible ‘pro-coercion’ view accepts both of these claims. Though I stop short of endorsing this view, it captures important ‘pro-coercion’ and ‘anti-coercion’ intuitions.