广东文化产业发展的基本条件分析

发展文化产业是广东全面贯彻落实科学发展观的一项战略抉择。区域产业发展视角下的广东文化产业,具备了若干基本条件,其中文化存量是基础,人才是创新源,环境是保障,政策支持是关键,资本是增值码,技术是助推器。研究总结这些基本条件,对各地发展文化产业决策至关重要。     

关于民营经济发展的制度思考

民营经济对于转型期中国经济的迅速发展发挥着示范和推动作用,不仅在经济增长方式、增长量上体现出来,而且从产权界定、制度创新、交易费用的节约、信息交换的对称、体制运行的一致均衡化等制度因素上发展、完善着中国经济的市场化运作。一个制度向另一个制度转轨的完成,或新的制度替代旧的制度,往往是以新制度规则的确定为标志。建立和巩固民营经济发展的制度基础,并且通过不断的制度创新为其进一步提供良好的整体社会环境和制度安排,对于我国最终实现向市场经济新体制的平衡过渡具有重要意义。     

中国特色的城市化：历史变迁、影响因素及道路选择

提高城市化水平是提升中国经济竞争力的基础，也是实现经济增长的关键。该文首先简要论述了中国城市发展的历史变迁，然后分析了影响城市化进程的几个关键因素：交通运输条件的改善、工业化水平的提高、农业的充分发展和资源布局，最后初步探索了中国特色的城市化道路选择：发展城市要以资源为依托。     

斯大林关于中国革命和社会发展的若干重要思想

斯大林在正确地认识中国革命特点的同时,反对关于中国革命问题的“左”倾思想,即反对关于中国革命发展速度上的“左”倾思想,反对关于中国建立苏维埃问题上的“左”倾思想,反对关于否定共产党员参加国民党必要性的“左”倾思想。他还就中国社会的改造、进步与发展提出了一些重要认识,如认为中国未来的政权是工农民主专政,建立这个政权有利于中国社会向社会主义社会过渡等等。     

影响美沙酮维持治疗效果的相关因素分析

目的:探讨影响美沙酮维持治疗时间及效果的相关因素。方法:研究对象为329名在我院美沙酮维持门诊治疗的海洛因依赖者。根据其在维持治疗门诊中服药时间的长短分为4组。Ⅰ组为服药时间不足3个月退出治疗者124人;Ⅱ组为服药时间超过3个月但不足6个月治疗者52人;Ⅲ组为服药时间超过6个月,但不足1a治疗者76人;Ⅳ组为服药时间超过1a治疗者77人。比较4组海洛因依赖者间的社会人口学特征、药物依赖及治疗剂量等影响美沙酮维持治疗等因素的差别。结果:Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组、Ⅳ组与Ⅰ组相比较,文化程度、职业、婚姻、社会支持系统差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);Ⅱ组、Ⅳ组与Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组年龄相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组、Ⅳ组与Ⅰ组比较,初吸年龄、吸毒时间、吸毒频率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);吸毒方式(单纯注射)、多药物滥用的Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组、Ⅳ组与Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组比较,有非常显著性差异(P<0.05或P<0.01)。首次吸毒原因各组间无差异(P>0.05),既往脱毒次数Ⅲ组、Ⅳ组与Ⅰ组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。服用美沙酮剂量与维持治疗时间呈高度正相关(P<0.01),药物剂量、治疗期间服药不稳定的Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组比较,P<0.05;Ⅰ组与Ⅲ组、Ⅳ组比较,P<0.01,差异均有统计学意义。结论:年轻的单身、无业、文化程度低、无家人支持、多药物滥用和维持剂量不足是影响美沙酮维持治疗依从性的危险因素。临床上对影响维持治疗的危险因素进行甄别,并采取相应的干预措施,能有效提高美沙酮维持治疗效果。     

旅游文化与山西旅游发展

文化是旅游发展的灵魂,只有把旅游与文化紧密结合起来,旅游产品才更具生命力。山西是旅游资源大省,旅游资源丰富,但山西的旅游业发展滞后,存在很多问题,主要表现在没有充分理解传统文化与现代文化的关系;整体形象设计不佳且未形成品牌。为了真正做好从旅游资源到旅游产品的开发工作,必须深层次地挖掘旅游资源的文化内涵;加强旅游环境建设,加大促销力度;重视历史、社会文化、民族文化的配套利用;搞好自然景观与文化的结合;贯彻旅游文化开发方针,正确处理现存的旅游文化。     

论科学发展观与中国和平发展

中国政府在国际社会一直高举和平、发展、合作的旗帜,强调要走和平发展的道路。科学发展观坚持了我国一贯的外交思想,坚持走和平发展道路,并揭示了中国和平发展的内在规律。     

Youth Development Outcomes of the Camp Experience: Evidence for Multidimensional Growth

Three thousand, three hundred and ninety-five families, whose child attended one of 80 different day or resident summer camps for at least one week, completed customized questionnaires that measured growth from precamp to postcamp in four domains: Positive Identity, Social Skills, Physical & Thinking Skills, and Positive Values & Spirituality. Parents, children, and camp staff reported significant positive change in these four domains; more than would be expected by maturation alone. Most gains were maintained or showed additional growth six months later. Few of the camp's structural elements correlated with growth, nor did striking gender, age, or ethnicity differences emerge. The study highlights the particular strengths of camp as an educational institution and social movement and suggests that different variations of summer camp can provide potent developmental experiences. Christopher A. Thurber is full-time faculty at Phillips Exeter Academy in Exeter, New Hampshire. He received his PhD in clinical psychology from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1997. His major research interests include homesickness, youth camping, and developmental psychopathology. Margery M. Scanlin is the Executive Officer for Research at the American Camp Association in Martinsville, Indiana. She received her EdD from Temple University in Philadelphia, PA, in 1982. Her major research interests include youth development outcomes, program improvement in youth organizations, and organizational aspects of effective camps. Leslie Scheuler Whitaker is a Senior Associate with Philliber Research Associates in St. Louis, Missouri. She received her PhD in social science research from Washington University in St. Louis in 2000. Her primary research areas include youth development, arts education, and program evaluation. Karla A. Henderson is a professor in the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism at North Carolina State University. She received her PhD in education from the University of Minnesota in 1979 and is currently a member of the American Camp Association Board of Directors. Her research interests include leisure behavior theory, camping and outdoor education, and gender and diversity issues.     

A Rationale and Method for Examining Reasons for Linkages Among Adolescent Risk Behaviors

A large volume of research has investigated interrelations among adolescent risk behaviors. Although several theoretical accounts have been proposed, researchers have not directly examined hypotheses for why risk behaviors are linked. In the present paper, a distinction is drawn between predictive factors that explain variance in risk behaviors and “linkage factors” which may provide an explanation for why risk behaviors are interrelated. The relevance of linkage factors to risk behavior research, theory, and practice is described. Further, a simple to use and easy to interpret analytic technique for exploring linkage-related issues is illustrated. Using this technique, hypotheses regarding the role of predictors in explaining linkages among risk behaviors can be tested directly. The proposed line of inquiry will provide valuable input for intervention efforts and theoretically relevant information concerning linkages among adolescent risk behaviors. Research Associate at the Brock Research Institute for Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. He received his M.A. in Clinical Psychology from the University of North Dakota. His major research interests are adolescent risk behavior involvement and youth activity involvement as a context for positive development. Professor in the Department of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. She received her Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology from the University of Waterloo. Her major research interests include adolescent risk taking and resilience, including academic underachievement and media/technology influences on lifestyle choices and learning. Assistant Professor in the Department of Child and Youth Studies at Brock University, Ontario, Canada. She received her Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology from Brock University. Her major research interests are adolescent risk-behavior involvement, particularly related to gambling, and risk and resilience.     

西安城市发展带动农村发展战略问题探析

近年来,西安农村经济社会虽有了较大改善,但城乡发展之间的差距仍是一个不可回避的突出问题。要实施城市带动农村发展战略,必须从统筹城乡发展和城乡互动式良性协调发展上去考虑,按照城乡联动的社会系统工程规划,积极探索城市对农村建设的多种带动方式,以产业为纽带,实现城乡经济共同发展。