我国高职法律类实训课程及教材建设探讨

通过论述高职法律教育法律职业技能培养的重要性,并采用比较研究的方式阐述了美国法律职业教育中诊所法律教育的特色,指出了我国高职法律职业人才培养之实训课程设置和教材建设存在的问题,说明在我国迫切需要加强对高职高专法律职业技能的实训课程设置和教材建设,对如何完善我国法律类高职高专实训课程设置、教材建设和职业技能培养提出了对策...     

诗性正义的实现——从刑法学方法论角度探讨

文学作品与刑法学研究的逻辑起点和适用终端均为社会中的人,二者所要面对的问题具有同源性,均为社会制度与人类意志、行为之间无穷尽的矛盾和冲突。面对多样态的矛盾和冲突,刑法以抽象性原则、强制性规范予以调整,而文学却以多元的视角、敏锐的触觉深刻再现了矛盾和冲突的萌芽、发展和激化,着力于探索其形成过程背后深刻的社会背景和历史根源——二者于方法论层面存在者隐性融合和交叉。文学可以将刑事古典学派、规范学派和社会学派的观点有机融合,拓展刑法学研究视野,将刑法学研究进一步推向深层次、广维度。     

中国法治需要迈进方法论时代

依法治国建设社会主义法治国家是我国宪法确定的治国方略,因此对社会主义法治理念的定位,必须坚持法治这一最高原则,在社会转型基本完成以后,我们应该进入法治时代。法治时代是一个讲法律理性和逻辑方法的时代。法治时代的法治理念承载不了太多的内容,我们应该在坚持宪法和法律至上的原则下,熟练掌握法律思维、法律方法、追求社会公平正义,使人人成为法治的缔造者。     

Against agency: a positional critique

Abstract

This paper uses the changing historical and theoretical frames within which management pay and investor claims are considered to provide a critique of the functionalist approach of agency and to develop an alternative, positional explanation of rewards. The first part of the paper draws on the contrast between the pre-1940 critique of the rentier and the post-1980 discursive construction of the shareholder to raise important contemporary questions about position and reward. The second part develops the idea of positional rewards to challenge agency assumptions by arguing that both giant firm managers and the less visible, though larger, group of intermediaries use their position to skim value. In contrast, the experience of position is more mixed for shareholders, who are generally passive value surfers. The final section of the paper argues that a renewed emphasis on position will enable a problem shift from value creation to value capture.     

论弗里德曼法律文化概念的方法论困境

弗里德曼＂法律文化＂概念的提出为研究法律文化的学者打开了一个视域上的新窗口,但此概念也招致了不同层面上的质疑与批判。而这些质疑与批判从根本上看是对弗里德曼＂法律文化＂这一概念所面临的方法论困境的呈现。一方面,旨在考察诸如观念、态度、价值模式等因素在形塑法律制度上的功用时,作为对象化的＂法律文化＂概念只是一种＂理想类型＂,其在科学性与可操作性上不尽使人满意;另一方面,作为实证化研究方法的＂法律文化＂概念又面临价值性功用上的危机,其在满足法社会科学＂用法律改良社会＂的理想方面以及解释多元性法律文化方面显得不尽如人意。     

The Concept, Connotations and Theoretical Frame of Urban Systems Engineering

Based on the concept of urban development, definition of urban systems engineering （USE） was put forward as a methodology for dealing with problems in the process of optimal evolution of urban whole, which is under the guidance of combination of urban thoughts and system approaches. Then the connotations of USE were elaborated, making the viewpoint of space time as a research clue, city and development as two research themes, urban system, urban logic and urban institution as three research dimensions, and stages, rules, strategies and regulation of development as four research problems. Finally by making Wuli-Shili-Renli systems methodology as stand, the theoretical frame of USE was built.     

当政治遇上历史:比较历史分析方法(CHA)介绍

当代西方比较政治研究由于过分迷信大样本计量统计和形式模型而忽视了许多人类社会生活中的实质性重要问题。作为一种有着深厚学术传统的研究范式,比较历史分析是部分西方学者对这一方法论危机的重要回应。相对而言,比较历史分析的研究特别致力于为大规模社会结果提供有历史深度的社会科学因果解释。它们不仅关注宏大的历史问题,而且试图为这些问题提供因果性解释;不仅运用案例间的比较确定历史问题的因果效应,同时重视案例内的分析探寻背后的因果机制;不仅热衷于追寻经济社会结果的长历史原因,同时强调历史时序的重要性。尽管国内政治学界一向擅长历史的研究,但由于缺乏规范的方法意识而鲜有比较历史分析的佳作。借助比较历史分析方法,中国学者不仅可以对本土政治问题开展跨国性的比较,同时可以整合不同研究方法的长处,繁荣中国的比较政治研究。     

当代科学方法论的特质

科技史证明许多伟大的科技成就都取决于方法创新和思维革命。从原子论、整体论、归纳演绎论、分析综合论、直觉论、否证论、一直到各种非理性主义,人类的思维和方法经历了一系列的飞跃与革命。方法创新和思维革命打破了科技活动中那些僵死陈旧的研究传统,推动着科学技术的不断进步与繁荣。今天,人类要想继续推动科学技术突飞猛进,就需要在认识论和方法论上特别关注普遍流行的各种非理性方法和后现代思维。其中,特别需要抬高直觉创造,提升科幻神话,倡扬发散式思维,普及科学虚构和赛博虚构,以提升人的发明创造能力。     

鸡肝微粒体细胞色素P450酶系检测方法的建立

为建立鸡肝微粒体细胞色素P450(CYP450)酶系活性的测定方法,应用超速离心法提取了12只60日龄依莎公鸡的肝微粒体,采用Bradford法测定肝微粒体蛋白含量,紫外分光光度法测定CYP450酶系活性。结果显示,肝微粒体蛋白含量为11.32 mg/g±1.43 mg/g,CYP450含量为0.71 nmol/mg±0.08 nmol/mg,NADPH细-胞色素C还原酶活性为3.01 nmol/(min.mg)±0.26 nmol/(min.mg),AND活性为2.36 nmol/(min.mg)±0.18 nmol/(min.mg),ERND活性为1.21 nmol/(min.mg)±0.11 nmol/(min.mg),AH活性为0.25 nmol/(min.mg)±0.03nmol/(min.mg)。结果表明,建立的鸡肝微粒体CYP450酶系的检测方法灵敏可靠,重复性较好。     

When legal rights are not a reality: do individuals know their rights and how can we tell?

Public knowledge of rights has been the subject of a number of empirical enquiries over the last decade. In England and Wales, knowledge of rights and its relationship with an individual's capacity to ‘self-help’ and ‘self-represent’ when faced with a civil justice problem has become the subject of renewed attention following changes to legal aid which, from March 2013, will see the availability of legal advice and representation dramatically reduced. Previous studies focusing on public knowledge of rights in this (and other) jurisdictions have illustrated a lack of knowledge amongst the general population and more specifically, a widespread tendency of individuals to assume that the law aligns with their own moral, ethical or social attitudes. However, many of these studies have also suffered from methodological shortcomings. In attempting to address some of these shortcomings this study uses an open-ended format to ask individuals with one or one or more civil or social justice problems to describe their rights/legal position. We find that whilst an open-ended question approach to exploring knowledge of rights yields insight not acquired by other formats, its utility is constrained by difficulty reconciling articulation and actual knowledge of rights. We discuss the implications of these findings as they relate to the development of future research in the field of family and social welfare law, Public Legal Education (PLE) and access to justice post-March 2013.