非国家工作人员能否构成贪污罪主体的共犯--以特殊身份资格为视角

贪污罪的主体是特殊主体,即国家工作人员.对非国家工作人员利用国家工作人员的职务便利共同秘密窃取公共财物的犯罪意图和行为的反映和评价,正确地对贪污罪进行定罪量刑,建构特殊身份在犯罪主体中的时代价值,有助于我们对共犯理论的更进一层次的理解.     

建立适应社会主义市场经济发展的道德体系

市场经济与道德存在着矛盾与对立,但二者之间也存在彼此容纳、彼此依赖、彼此统一的属性。发展社会主义市场经济,不仅要建立相应的法律体系,而且要建立与之相适应的思想道德体系。     

论职务侵占案件中国家工作人员共同犯罪的定性

职务侵占案件中国家工作人员共同犯罪的类型比较复杂，其中国家工作人员与单位工作人员相互勾结，各自利用职务便利将单位财物占为己有的，其定性最具争议。对于该情形，仍然应当依照身份者的实行行为决定共同身份犯的性质这一原则定为职务侵占罪，而不能分别定罪、以主犯定罪或定贪污罪。     

论政府官员的道德自律

在社会转型时期．官员的道德自律是落实以德治国方略的关键所在。官员的道德自律主要体现在党性自律、敬业自律、行为自律和清廉自律等方面．目的在于行政行为的公正性和自觉性，从而提高行政水平和行政质量、官员的道德自律是社会主义市场经济建设不可缺少的保证，是关系到党和国家兴旺发达、事业成败的大问题。     

我国网络文明建设面临的挑战及对策

计算机互联网的延生,改变了人们的生产和生活方式,也在思想文化领域产生了重大而深远的影响。同时,信息网络的发展,也带来了一些网络社会问题,使网络文明面临严峻的挑战。因此,规范网民文明上网,增强网民的网络道德意识,建设网络文明,理应成为我国公民道德建设的一项重要内容。     

伦理实体:道德教化的社会环境支持

人们在讨论道德教化问题时,一般都认为只要制定一套合理的道德原则和道德规范,教育人们遵守执行,就能提高人们的道德水平。而实际上,道德教化是人的内在心灵的整体生长,所以需要社会的伦理环境的支持、营养。因此使人们的生活共同体成为伦理实体,对道德教化来说是绝对必需的。     

Adivasiness as Caste Expression and Land Rights Claim-Making in Central-Eastern India

ABSTRACT

The adivasi population represents a special case in India’s new land wars. Strong individual and community rights to agricultural and forest lands have been enacted for this group based on notions of adivasi identities as primeval, but without linking these to economic and political influence. This article interrogates the adivasi land question seen through a caste lens. It does so via case studies in two states to understand the ways in which adivasi identity can be mobilised for its instrumental value and used to demand land rights. In Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court’s Samatha Judgement has prevented virtually all private mining activities. In Jharkhand, however, similar legislation is seen to be trumped by the national Coal Bearing Areas Act, as well as by former and current land acquisition acts that allow industrial land claims to take precedence over identity-based ones. Available evidence indicates the challenges involved in bringing support for land rights that are premised on a supposedly unchanging adivasi identity when these rights go against dominant interests. This circumstance serves to highlight the possibilities present in caste analysis to understand the plight of adivasis, despite their usually distinct treatment in scholarly analyses.     

Facebook: An Emerging Arena for Politics of Self-Determination in northern Cyprus?

ABSTRACT

The present article aims to expand scholarship on the political role of social media by focusing on the case of Facebook and the self-determination claims of Turkish Cypriots vis-à-vis Turkey. Drawing upon a virtual ethnography of relevant Facebook sites and groups, this article scrutinises whether social media offer an innovative public platform for the politics of self-determination or on-line claims are in reality formed and negotiated in the same manner as the offline ones. The article concludes that Turkish Cypriots’ Facebook activism may very well be for strengthening their community, shielding their distinct characteristics from mainland Turkey and raising their self-esteem, rather than indicating demands for complete autonomy in the traditional political sense of the word and/or statehood.     

The role of moral disengagement in the execution process

The present study tested the proposition that disengagement of moral self-sanctions enables prison personnel to carry out the death penalty. Three subgroups of personnel in penitentiaries located in three Southern states were assessed in terms of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement. The personnel included the execution teams that carry out the executions; the support teams that provide solace and emotional support to the families of the victims and the condemned inmate; and prison guards who have no involvement in the execution process. The executioners exhibited the highest level of moral, social, and economic justifications, disavowal of personal responsibility, and dehumanization. The support teams that provide the more humane services disavowed moral disengagement, as did the noninvolved guards but to a lesser degree than the support teams.     

天人合一思想的当代诠释学意义

近年来 ,许多学者都注意到天人合一这一中国古代哲学思想蕴含着深刻的生态意义 ,但是 ,几乎都将其解释为天人“同”一而不是天人“合”一或天人“和”一。这种差异是巨大的 ,前者所追求的是自然与人的混沌未分 ,而后者则强调自然与人是分离并矛盾的 ,正因为其矛盾而构成了相互不可或缺的差异协同的互补性整体。