树立依法治国理念依法实施侦查行为

依法治国是社会主义法治的核心内容,树立依法治国的理念,就是在全社会和全体公民,特别是执法者中养成自觉尊重法律、维护法律权威、严格依法办事的思想意识.在刑事程序法领域贯彻依法治国理念,就是坚持刑事程序法定原则.在侦查实践中,违背刑事程序法定原则任意实施侦查行为是一个不容忽视的问题,不仅事关一个国家的法治进程,而且对当事人、侦查人员、证据材料和案件事实均可能造成不利影响,因此有必要采取有效措施予以遏制.     

超高效液相色谱法（UPLC）同时筛选检测吗啡等7种常见毒品

目的建立快速筛选检测中毒者血液、尿液中吗啡、甲基苯丙胺、苯丙胺、麻黄碱、3，4-亚甲基双氧甲基苯丙胺（MDMA）、3，4-亚甲基双氧苯丙胺（MDA）、氯胺酮并定量分析的方法；方法采用超高效液相色谱（UP—LC）-二极管阵列检测器（PAD）；结果峰面积和质量浓度的线性关系良好，分离效果好、速度快、灵敏度提高；结论该方法与传统的HPLC相比能够更好满足实际办案中吗啡、甲基苯丙胺、苯丙胺、麻黄碱、MDMA、MDA、氯胺酮等中毒者血液、尿液的筛选检测并定量分析。     

责任政府初探

责任政府已经成为我国政治体制和行政体制改革的一个基本取向。树立责任政府的理念,努力构建责任政府,对于发展中的中国来说,具有重要的现实意义。本文从责任政府的内涵、责任形式及建立责任政府的原则入手,探讨责任政府的一些基本理论问题。     

Strange bedfellows: Federal systems and performance management

This paper offers the first link between models of the measurement and management of performance and the dimensions of governance arrangements in federal systems. Four ideal type approaches to governance in federal systems are correlated against four ideal types of measuring and managing performance. The paper develops a model that will support empirical research examining reform trajectories where evolving systems of federalism require evolving systems to manage performance in joint arrangements between levels of government.     

Numbers in regulatory intermediation: Exploring the role of performance measurement between legitimacy and compliance

Much regulatory intermediation has come to entail forms of calculation and performance measurement. In this paper we analyze the role of performance measurement in regulatory intermediation in a transnational multistakeholder setting where intermediation lacks an official mandate. We do this through a study of the Access to Medicine Index, which ranks pharmaceutical companies in terms of their access to medicine policies and practices in developing countries. We conceptualize multistakeholder intermediaries as “second order rulemakers” reconciling diverse and often competing implicit and explicit rules across the governance field. We then detail various intermediation roles of performance measurement between attaining input and output legitimacy and enticing compliance among targets. Our case demonstrates how the selective formalization of measurement processes and the related ability to move back and forth from the role of intermediary to that of “ad hoc rulemaker” are important conditions for achieving and maintaining legitimacy. Furthermore, it shows that for multistakeholder intermediaries that rely on performance measurement, compliance by targets depends on the uptake of performance information by powerful constituencies. This illustrates how addressing legitimacy concerns and enticing compliance through performance measurement should be examined as co‐emerging processes.     

Pedagogy of regulation: Strategies and instruments to supervise learning from adverse events

Diverse scholars have argued that standards and performance measurements are “instruments of control” that have a profound influence on the day‐to‐day lives of individuals and organizations, causing constitutive effects. Regulatory bodies increasingly use standards to oversee and monitor the regulated. This paper discusses the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate's use of both standards and a performance measurement system introduced to monitor how Dutch hospitals investigate and learn from serious adverse events. Rather than focusing on how standards affect regulated practices and organizations, our study examines how the use of these instruments affects the standard maker, that is, the Inspectorate. We explore how the Inspectorate's work practices, standards, and coupled performance measurement system influence its regulatory pedagogy, reviewing practices, and decisionmaking. We conclude that standards and performance measurement systems are not by definition “instruments of control” as their constitutive effects are (under)determined by the relationships in which they are enacted.     

英、美、澳地方政府绩效评估指标比较及启示

在分析了英国、美国、澳大利亚几个国家对地方政府进行评估而采用的指标体系和框架之后,通过比较他们的共同点与不同之处,提出了对中国地方政府绩效评估有价值的启示,以更加完善的评估指标体系来引导地方政府真正为了人民群众公共利益而提升责任性和绩效管理水平。     

异体评估:我国政府绩效评估的路径选择及理论建构

我国政府绩效评估工作在经历了十年的快速发展以后,最近有陷入评估困境的趋势。同体评估是困局之源,其解决需要在理论层面有所突破。从评估对象界定切入,对政府绩效评估的性质进行分析,提出及解释了"管理评估"和"治理评估"两个范式,并尝试提出了"异体评估"概念,在此基础上提出构建以人大为主导的政府绩效评估主体结构的理论框架。基于人大的异体评估路径切合我国政府绩效评估的内涵及其肇兴的体制改革诉求,有望建立起适合中国实际的政府绩效评估动力机制,进一步释放评估活力。     

共同正犯与身份关系问题探析

共同正犯的定罪和量刑与犯罪人的身份关系密切。无身份者虽然不能够实行真正身份犯的整个实行行为,但可以分担该犯罪的部分实行行为,因此,无身份者可以与有身份者就某些犯罪成立真正身份犯的共同正犯。探析共同正犯与犯罪人的身份关系问题,对于正确贯彻我国刑法有效打击犯罪和尊重保障人权的理念,以及指导司法实践具有重要意义。